that belongs in a museum

The Early Reactions And Reviews Of 'Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny' Are All Over The Place

The Early Reactions And Reviews Of 'Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny' Are All Over The Place
Premiering at the Cannes Film Festival, some people tweeted out buzz about the upcoming sequel, and some publications ran official reviews. No one can agree on its quality, however.
· 20.2k reads ·
· ·

After three classic films in the '80s (let's avoid the problematic elements of "Temple of Doom"), the Walt Disney Company dipped back into the honey pot for 2008's "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull." Nobody liked it and it everyone agrees it's the worst one — and that it was unnecessary to make a fourth film in the series.

So here we are again, in 2023, with a fifth and final(?) Indy movie starring Harrison Ford. "The Dial of Destiny" is the first film not directed by Steven Spielberg, this time it's being helmed by director James Mangold ("Ford v Ferrari," "Logan" and others).

The tweets coming out from the film's world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival were very mixed. Did Harrison Ford really have to make yet another installment motion picture, or was he better off taking an extended holiday?


Early buzz


Reviews

The premise

The artifact in question is Archimedes' Dial, a mathematical tool believed capable of opening fissures in time. Nazi scientist Jürger Voller — a too-obvious Mads Mikkelsen, playing a Wernher von Braun type who's easily the most boring villain Indy has ever had to face — certainly believes in the device's power, and when the story picks up in 1969, he's still desperate to find the missing piece that might allow the jumpstart to fulfill its mysterious purpose. Indy, meanwhile, has no such motivation. His marriage to Marion Ravenwood in shambles and his son out of the picture (feel free to breathe a sigh of relief), Indy is trudging towards retirement as a professor at Hunter College, and the "get off my lawn" vibes have never been stronger. Nor has his relevance ever been in greater doubt; his students used to blink love notes at him with their eyelids, and now they sleep through class.

[IndieWire]

"Dial of Destiny" is the first installment in the swashbuckling archaeology franchise since Indiana Jones ventured to the "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" in 2008 and, given Indy's and Harrison Ford's ages, surely the last. "Crystal Skull" was generally regarded as an attempt to drive the old-school comic-book aesthetic of the Indiana Jones concept into the new world of action spectaculars. The lackluster result got the thumbs-down from critics and a lot of fans. It lacked that appealing aroma of cheap seats at the Saturday matinee.

[Deadline]


TL;DR

Nobody with a brain in their heads will compare "Dial of Destiny" favorably to the first three films.

[The Irish Times]

Indiana Jones still has a certain old-school class.

[The Guardian]

It ultimately feels like a counterfeit of priceless treasure: the shape and the gleam of it might be superficially convincing for a bit, but the shabbier craftsmanship gets all the more glaring the longer you look.

[Daily Telegraph]

If you join him for the ride, it feels like a fitting goodbye to cinema's favourite grave-robber.

[Empire]


Watch the trailer:

Comments

  1. Jordan Chandler 11 months ago

    I am not going to bother they lost me at Kingdom of the Crystal skull. Plus how did the SKull get taken? When they bring it back all the traps are set, nobody has been there for hundreds of years...someone snuck in, sawed the head off the alien without it doing anything and reset all the traps? SUre.


Cut Through The Chaos With Digg Edition

Sign up for Digg's daily morning newsletter to get the most interesting stories. Sent every morning.