Appeals court upholds Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk
POLITICO reports the 2–1 decision backed the Pentagon's concerns about restrictions built into Claude. Anthropic has said it bars use of its products for autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance.
TLDR
POLITICO reports that the D.C. Circuit's September 25, 2026, ruling allows the Pentagon to blacklist Anthropic from all its contracts. The majority found that restrictions built into Claude supported the department's supply chain risk designation.
In opinion excerpts published by Reason, the majority said the exclusion followed Anthropic's refusal to relax contractual bans on using Claude for lethal autonomous warfare or domestic surveillance. It rejected the company's statutory and constitutional challenges. On the First Amendment claim, it said the exclusion concerned Anthropic's refusal to accept a contract term, not its advocacy for AI regulation.
Dissenting Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson argued that the supply chain law did not cover a contractor's open enforcement of restrictions on how its product could be used.
Combined views
—
First seen 11h ago
Appeals court upholds Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk
POLITICO reports the 2–1 decision backed the Pentagon's concerns about restrictions built into Claude. Anthropic has said it bars use of its products for autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance.
TLDR
POLITICO reports that the D.C. Circuit's September 25, 2026, ruling allows the Pentagon to blacklist Anthropic from all its contracts. The majority found that restrictions built into Claude supported the department's supply chain risk designation.
In opinion excerpts published by Reason, the majority said the exclusion followed Anthropic's refusal to relax contractual bans on using Claude for lethal autonomous warfare or domestic surveillance. It rejected the company's statutory and constitutional challenges. On the First Amendment claim, it said the exclusion concerned Anthropic's refusal to accept a contract term, not its advocacy for AI regulation.
Dissenting Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson argued that the supply chain law did not cover a contractor's open enforcement of restrictions on how its product could be used.