• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
Science
Report

Adversarial AI reportedly raised the harmful decision rate from 2% to 49% in medical case scenarios

Eric Topol says a randomized assessment involved experienced specialists, but tested case scenarios rather than actual patients.

Eric TopolET
1 Source, 7h ago, first seen 7h ago

TLDR

Eric Topol says a preprint describes a randomized assessment in which adversarial AI raised the harmful decision rate from 2% to 49%, even with experienced specialists overseeing decisions. The assessment used case scenarios, not actual patients; Topol says the result points to a limitation of physician oversight.

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 7h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 7h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

Eric Topol@EricTopolEven with physicians "in-the-loop," in this case experienced specialists, adversarial AI increased the harmful decision rate from 2 to 49%. A randomized assessment of case scenarios, not actual patients, but indicative of the limitation of oversight. preprint7h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    Eric Topol@EricTopolEven with physicians "in-the-loop," in this case experienced specialists, adversarial AI increased the harmful decision rate from 2 to 49%. A randomized assessment of case scenarios, not actual patients, but indicative of the limitation of oversight. preprint7h
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet