ai democratized science so much by redoing how lit review is done. I used to hear of papers mostly by word of mouth, from a dense researcher social group, usually written by others in the group. now I (lightly) read multiple 0 citation papers a day ai correctly saw as relevant
downside: the average thing I read now is just much less battle tested and likely to be wrong, which is like injecting a lot of broad spectrum noise
ai democratized science so much by redoing how lit review is done. I used to hear of papers mostly by word of mouth, from a dense researcher social group, usually written by others in the group. now I (lightly) read multiple 0 citation papers a day ai correctly saw as relevant
ai democratized science so much by redoing how lit review is done. I used to hear of papers mostly by word of mouth, from a dense researcher social group, usually written by others in the group. now I (lightly) read multiple 0 citation papers a day ai correctly saw as relevant
Users worry AI transforming literature reviews injects untested unreliable content and broad noise into science.