nuopus does this thing where it leads with disagreement and then tries to retroactively justify it, which leads to internally inconsistent non sequiturs like this. whatever anti sycophancy stuff they did is just, not at all calibrated on this iteration
i cant believe im saying this but it was better when the default disposition in this kind of situation was hedging/fencesitting instead of treating you adversarially by default (and then not even noticing that wtf it's doing is contradictory)
nuopus does this thing where it leads with disagreement and then tries to retroactively justify it, which leads to internally inconsistent non sequiturs like this. whatever anti sycophancy stuff they did is just, not at all calibrated on this iteration
nuopus does this thing where it leads with disagreement and then tries to retroactively justify it, which leads to internally inconsistent non sequiturs like this. whatever anti sycophancy stuff they did is just, not at all calibrated on this iteration
Many users criticized Claude's shift toward argumentative responses as misaligned and overconfident due to safety priorities, preferring earlier hedging approaches.