/AI4h ago

Gary Marcus argues the eventual winners of the AI transition will rely on neurosymbolic systems

This responds to Carlos E. Perez's AI dot-com boom analogy.

--0--
Original post
Carlos E. Perez@IntuitMachine#1596inAI

@GaryMarcus Just like the internet, with its boom-and-bust cycles, we'll have winners and losers. But the winners will be unimaginably huge, just as today's internet companies could not have been imagined back in 2000.

Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

Three Predictions:

1. Some form of AI, probably neurosymbolic in nature, will come that is far more economical and data- and energy-efficient than LLMs, and it will make an absolute fortune.

2. LLMs, on the other hand, will never be all that profitable (aside from the chip companies selling shovels in the gold rush).

3. Today’s gigantic bets are premature, and most won’t pay off.

4:30 AM · Jun 4, 2026 · 815 Views
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
-
Views
-
Comments
-
Reposts
-
Bookmarks
Expand data
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most ActivityTimeline
VIEWS479LIKES4REPLIES2
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

@IntuitMachine huge and neurosymbolic is what i am saying.

Carlos E. Perez@IntuitMachine

@GaryMarcus Just like the internet, with its boom-and-bust cycles, we'll have winners and losers. But the winners will be unimaginably huge, just as today's internet companies could not have been imagined back in 2000.

2hViews 479Likes 4Bookmarks 0
Gary Marcus argues the eventual winners of the AI transition will rely on neurosymbolic systems · Digg