Stony Brook's Tuhin Chakrabarty voiced support for the framework
xuan (ɕɥɛn / sh-yen)#745
This year, the NeurIPS 2026 Position Paper Track made the decision to require that all papers be substantially human-written, with AI used for only copy-editing or similar peripheral changes to the main text!
For more details, please check our blogpost: https://blog.neurips.cc/2026/06/02/ai-generated-papers-in-the-neurips-2026-position-paper-track/
The NeurIPS position paper track was flooded with submissions that substantially used AI. More than other tracks, and despite a requirement otherwise.
I appreciate the chairs' strong action. People are not entitled to reviewers' time, AI makes it exceptionally easy to waste it.
This year, the NeurIPS 2026 Position Paper Track made the decision to require that all papers be substantially human-written, with AI used for only copy-editing or similar peripheral changes to the main text!
For more details, please check our blogpost: https://blog.neurips.cc/2026/06/02/ai-generated-papers-in-the-neurips-2026-position-paper-track/
Stony Brook's Tuhin Chakrabarty voiced support for the framework
xuan (ɕɥɛn / sh-yen)#745This year, the NeurIPS 2026 Position Paper Track made the decision to require that all papers be substantially human-written, with AI used for only copy-editing or similar peripheral changes to the main text!
For more details, please check our blogpost: https://blog.neurips.cc/2026/06/02/ai-generated-papers-in-the-neurips-2026-position-paper-track/
Positive users praise NeurIPS mandating human-written papers for its 2026 position track to curb AI slop and show rigor, while negative users call out perceived hypocrisy among researchers protecting their own work.
