What is Digg?217 Comments
- jron, on 10/11/2007, -9/+63shocked this one isn't on the list:
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidentsÉto attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. David Rockefeller, Memoirs, Random House, 2002, p. 405 - jsd8cc, on 10/11/2007, -3/+30Cup Noodles is owned by the Nissin Food Products company, which was founded by Momofuku Ando (also known as "Mr. Noodle"). Mr. Ando was deeply involved with the Japanese government post-WWII, receiving medals for his perfection of the process to produce instant noodles. With cooperation from the US government, Nissin began to sell the nefarious Cup Noodles in the US in 1971. Cup Noodles are well known for having copious amounts of MSG, which is used by the NWO as a psychotropic anodyne in order to control the masses.
Get a clue, man. - dukeeeey, on 10/15/2007, -6/+31Bush seniors new world order speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo - kaelyiesta, on 10/15/2007, -5/+27The easiest way to show that one rule(empire/government/order/whatever) can be bad is by asking this simple question: Who gets to be the ruler?
Put another way, uniting people under one rule is another way of saying that you now control them. It's all a matter of control and who is doing it. The larger the group of people being ruled, the more different view points must be stifled. I'm sure most countries would hate (as they already do) being told what to do by the US if we somehow came to rule over the whole world. I'd be just as hostile if the US became subject to islamic law for instance.
Localized power was one of the things the US constitution tried to uphold for this very reason. People should be free to live how they wish in so far as they do not harm other people. Trying to make everyone conform to one set of rules is just begging for revolt. - redrock34, on 10/15/2007, -7/+27I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorists, and frankly I think some of them are down right nuts. But I don't find it that hard to believe that there are some people beyond our reach that wants to grow their power. Think about it, what are most Americans worrying about these days, Paris Hilton going to jail? I wish more people would pay more attention to politics so that those with an agenda can't ruin this country
- MindTrigger, on 10/15/2007, -4/+21Yeah, we are a bunch of crazies. Just how the hell do you think the US Constitution, and all it's protections are going to apply to a North American Union (Canda, Mexico, US), or One World Government? The answer is, THEY WON'T. A new governing body will be formed that will override the individual countries. Any combining of governing systems will to result in the US having LESS freedom, not more.
We are in the midst of a damned "conspiracy" right now. Do ANY of you know the correct answer as to why we are in Iraq? Have you picked your favorite reason from the list of BS BushCo has spewed since 9/11? If people could have been on Digg in 2001-2002 telling you morons how wrong it would be to go into Iraq, you would have spouted the same uninformed opinions, shouting them down and calling them crazies.
Do you realize how minute the chances are of you being killed by a terrorist in the United States? Even if you count 9/11 the numbers are so ridiculously small that it makes me laugh. We have WIDE OPEN borders, people. The oceans, Mexico, Canada...are they protected? Yet we should be worried about taking a water bottle on an airplane? There is no logical reason for the controls, the spying on our own people, the patriot act, GITMO, etc. It's all *****. Do you think Obama or Clinton are going to fix things, or will they uphold the status quo?
Give me a reason to trust ANYTHING those people in DC are doing now, as they hold OUR wallets open for themselves, their cronies, big business, friends and family while taking our rights away slowly but surely. You are the frogs. The water is heating up. - redrock34, on 11/01/2007, -5/+21Cup o' Noodles
- DutchGuilder, on 10/20/2007, -2/+16Here is some more fuel for the conspiracy fire. Google the "Council on Foreign Relations" (CFR). Essentially the CFR = New World Order = Federal Reserve. The CFR meetings are held in secret with 1,400 members on both sides of political fence, including the Rockefellers, Rudy G, Hillary C, George B, Obama B, Dick C, mainstream media anchors, CEOs, etc. Now here is the conspiracy part: listen to what Aaron Russo says about the CFR and 9/11: http://hubpages.com/hub/Astonishing_Interview_with_Aaron_Russo_who_met_with_Nick_Rockefeller
- worldinmyeyes, on 10/15/2007, -0/+14Can't see the evil, huh nblsavage? Let me ask you...if these people - in order to achieve their NWO - have to rely on secrecy, subterfuge, media control, political and economic control, and a dumbed down population....what makes you think they have *our* best interests in mind? Can you answer that please?
P.S. - Hitler also wanted a new world order. - physphd, on 10/11/2007, -2/+16That's a good one. I buried this story, though, because the few "quotes" that I looked up were not accurate. For example, wer're told that Bill Clinton said,
"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans."
When in fact the entire quote (note that ellipsis marks are absent so you don't know that words have been removed) is, "We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans to legitimately own handguns and rifles—it's something I strongly support—we can't be so fixated on that that we are unable to think about the reality of life that millions of Americans face on streets that are unsafe, under conditions that no other nation—no other nations—has permitted to exist." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America:_From_Freedom_to_Fascism
So the alleged "quote" is selectively truncated to provide almost the entire opposite meaning of the full quote. - spyd3rweb, on 10/15/2007, -2/+16The problem is humans are diverse and have different beliefs, and can choose their own way of life. also concentrating too much power in one area is an invitation for disaster.
- nblsavage, on 10/11/2007, -5/+18Oh sure..you expect me to believe that?
- honkeybot5k, on 10/15/2007, -1/+13I think a global government would only be able to truly manifest in the wake of a huge global disaster which results in a significant reduction in the population.
It's interesting to allow your mind to envision this sort of world. Would there be some who live in city-states? Huge urban centers with cameras at every corner, and the security of available food, housing, and health care at a cost of personal freedom. Would there be others who reject this lifestyle in favor of living off-grid in small, sustainable rural communities? Would there be any land in this country not sized by the government and / or wealthy private citizens?
It's a fun thought experiment. And no one here can say with total authority that there isn't an idealogical agenda being pursued by a small group of very wealthy and powerful people. (Project for the New American Century, anyone? Iraq?)
I don't know that it's as insidious as some of the theories suggested by the Alex Jones of the world, but it certainly does behoove us to remain watchful for any group of people that attempts to overstep the boundaries set by the respective laws of their country.
Perhaps we should take a closer look at the Trans-Texas corridor and ask ourselves, do we really want to make it so easy for another country to come right up through Texas and access middle-America? Though I feel silly for thinking about this, I just cant get the image of hundreds of tanks rolling up that toll road into America.
If you're interested, take a look around for more info. Here's quick link, please forgive that it's an infowars video. These are American farmers and ranchers who are talking about the new corridor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlumHzseiYw - Gerz1219, on 10/15/2007, -3/+13You act as though that's not a huge problem that would cost millions of lives. Would you accept a Chinese president issuing orders from Beijing? Do you think Muslims would accept a Canadian president? There will be a peaceful one-world government when all people decide they like each other and are willing to work out their differences without slaughter. Which, of course, will be never. A one-world government can only mean a horrible tyrannical state from which there is no escape.
- novask, on 10/11/2007, -2/+12May you live in interesting times.
- worldinmyeyes, on 11/01/2007, -4/+14So the global elite have caused wars and killed millions for profit, made sure that drugs and terrorism flourish, work with the Mafia, overthrown governments, controlled the media, dumbed down the school system, installed and supported repressive regimes...and some pinheads on digg think it's a good idea to give control of the entire world to these people? I shake my head at the sheer ignorance of these people. Meanwhile, the globalists smile.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -5/+14I like the beef ones the best.
- worldinmyeyes, on 10/15/2007, -1/+10For decades it was, "There is NO PLAN to have a New World Order."
Now, for many, it is, "Yeah, there is a New World Order plan, but it will be a good thing."
Later on they will realize they are all idiots for not heeding the warnings, and believing the global elites and the media they control. - inactive, on 10/15/2007, -5/+14The history of the world is indeed replete with conspiracies - which are simply groups of people who want to gain something getting together and helping each other out behind closed doors. No secret societies needed - just criminally minded *****. Having said that, these crooks would love to sideline honest investigators and interested public by making them look like crazy ***** loons. This website would be inordinately useful in achieving the latter, because quoting any of this stuff will make you sound crazy. Better to learn a bit about modern history & economics. That's all you need to establish that there are groups of people who are making profit & gaining power behind the scenes. Cut out the loony religious mumbo-jumbo, too, while you're at it.
- BlacklabelSAR, on 11/01/2007, -0/+8Imagine if by learning the truth of the NWO, you start to preceive reality more correctly. And then that schizophrenic preacher on the downtown street corner, his words start to sound different now. Since you are now able to see and hear clearly, his words no longer sound crazy. Now you realize that he is trying to warn us about what is happening. Now he makes perfect sense....
- rainergamer, on 10/15/2007, -0/+8A United Earth is nothing more than the same thing villains have tried for thousands of years: world domination.
Just because they changed their tactics from burninating the countryside to wrecking global politics doesn't make it any less despicable. Wisen up. - knobtwiddler, on 10/15/2007, -0/+8 no competition, massive bureaucracy, total enslavement.
- MindTrigger, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9The fact is, this 'age of information" is a useless *****. There is so much misinformation to counter any real information, that no one knows what to think anymore. They get their news bites, blurbs, and comments from their favorite hot air spewers on cable news. The percentage of informed people on Digg may be a bit higher than the national average, but the vast majority here don't bother. What I don't get is how people can comment on some of these subjects without feeling ashamed at having never lifted a finger to learn more about it first.
- SpectralSounds, on 10/11/2007, -3/+11Soylent Green
- trippinlikegod, on 10/15/2007, -12/+20Open your eyes man..
- vanza001, on 10/15/2007, -2/+10The only problem with a United Earth is that the people who would be 'voted' (read: chosen ahead of time) to rule would be the same type of people who now rule Washington and who have dragged us into a war on false pretenses. I am for less federal government. No large governments of any kind. We should be as our constitution intended; States united. States should have sovereignty and the federal government should have as much power as the UN does now.
- birch25, on 10/15/2007, -4/+12i think the gun control quotes were to show they don't want us to be able to defend ourselves.
that said, NWO nuts drive me crazy. i swear they have images of big underground bunkers (around huge, circular tables naturally) where the world's richest people and "true" rulers of the world get together and discuss what evil things to do to us next. - kevin_qnn, on 10/11/2007, -3/+11Optimism doesn't matter. The reality is that all governments are capable of becoming corrupt, evil, etc. You can't just hope for the best when it comes to government.
- Hortnon, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9No, that's a female conspiracy to get us all to spend money on them.
- jspegele, on 10/11/2007, -2/+10salt
- theblueprint, on 10/15/2007, -1/+9Dude, the tables are octagonal... uh...um...I mean...There's no such thing as bunkers. Forget I just said that.
- knotty, on 11/01/2007, -0/+7Always a good time for a Hicks quote:
“You know only a handful of people actually run the country, it’s provable... After you’re elected you are ushered into this smoke-filled room with the twelve industrialist capitalist scum-***** that got you elected, a screen comes down and you are shown a film of the Kennedy assassination from an angle you’ve never seen before, looking suspiciously off the grassy knoll. The lights come up and they [say] to the new President, ‘Any questions?’”
Bill Hicks R.I.P. - foopirata, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9Nah that's an insidious Chinese "cup" (get the pun? eh? do you?) to rob us of our precious body fluids.
- inactive, on 10/15/2007, -4/+11because the people manipulating world events towards a one-world government lie about it and are behind some of the worst things in the past few centuries, see world war 2, war on terror, taking freedoms etc.
governments go bad 100% of the time - jeffiek, on 10/15/2007, -11/+18It's possible, although difficult, to escape China, Russia, Cuba....
Some people even escape the USA.
Pray tell, how will you escape a "United Earth"? - 2012, on 10/15/2007, -0/+7There are a total of 11 pages printed out. I made it too page 6 and my mind was going down. I am amazed at the time frame in these statements (some as early as 1844) and I was saddened by the remarks by Bill Clinton.
"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans..." "And so alot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities"--President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
Then this one:
"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.."--
Bill Clinton USA Today--3-11-93, page 2a
I am wasn't watching MTV that day and I certainly missed the article in the magazine. I wonder what else I have been missing along the way?
It seems that the "New World Order" is alright as long as the order is going your way. So I see that this "New World Order" is no different than any other "order" we have had in the history of mankind. It is simply a new spin on how to control the masses by the will of a few. The rules for the masses do not apply to the few and that is how they have always won. It is wrong and we all know it. But we as the "masses" will not work together peacefully enough nor long enough to stop it. - omyard, on 10/25/2007, -2/+9nWo sucks!
Wolfpack 4-Life! - Darel99, on 10/15/2007, -0/+7As a former banker the president of Wachovia National Bank stated in one of our meetings that
Our bank was involved in the "New Finical World Order" apparently I wasn't supposed to ask him to clarify his position with the near loss of my job since I asked him to clearly his position I was told I was being disrespectful. I then worked night and day to develop my own online company and left three months later. Till this day Ken Thomspon is still the president of Wachovia Bank.
A few weeks after I left the bank I found a old book written by Albert Pike. I can only tell you those who support the New World Order are crazy. They are dangerous and they think they should rule your life and they are putting into place a method to control commerce, banking, food, etc., Why? Control your life!
If you study our nation it's easy to conclude the dangerous implications of the United Nations and the elite who support large companies.
We are at risk and you must tell your family and friends about this issue.
In my estimate the ruling elite may include 3000-4500 world wide. Will you allow such a small number of people control you? Will you let the Real ID Act become a law or will you contact your state rep and raise holy hell until it's defeated? What will you do? - themacx, on 10/15/2007, -0/+6so I'm nuts.... well rather that then a NWO slave.
- Miche1987, on 10/11/2007, -4/+10What are those noodles REALLY made of?
- SpaceMonkeyZero, on 10/25/2007, -18/+24Is there ANYTHING that isn't a conspiracy?
- ISIfunded911, on 10/15/2007, -0/+6The media control billions of minds.
The school system does too.
Who controls the schools and the media? The capitalist oligarchy.
See John Taylor Gatto - Underground History of American Education, and Noam Chomsky and McLuhan about the media. - worldinmyeyes, on 10/11/2007, -3/+8Amazing how many people are in the dark, and ignorant about what's to come. They will be the morons who welcome in the New World Order (that Hitler wanted to achieve) and gladly take their microchip for promises of "security," "prosperity," and "no more wars." They will not be able to say they haven't been warned. Wake up sheep.
- vanza001, on 10/15/2007, -3/+8true story... I've thought this for years but no one will listen to my 'crazy talk'.
- planktonx, on 10/15/2007, -1/+6They are now in control, at least on most key government positions. Nobody gets a high ranking government post, even the presidency, without their blessing.
- miriclaire, on 10/15/2007, -0/+5The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991.
THINK< man! - artemus, on 10/15/2007, -1/+6What you just quoted is actually WORSE than the ellipsis. Bill Clinton is actually asking for the abolishment of the Second Amendment, a right which according to the Constitution "Shall NOT be infringed". In other words, Bill is saying that the right to bear arms is less important than the right to be safe! Funny, i never read THAT in the constitution.
- worldinmyeyes, on 10/15/2007, -2/+7Anyone heard of absolute power corrupting, absolutely? To read this thread, these ninnies supporting a NWO are born to be sheeple, serving their masters.
- MindTrigger, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6yeah, and what about the current world and it's leaders/controllers makes you think nanotechnology will be used for good?
- hfactor, on 10/15/2007, -1/+6If "localized power" works for the US, why shouldn´t it work for a united world? There doesn´t need to be one set of rules for all.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 214 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is