digg

Join DiggAbout

Digg Townhall Tonight!
Tune into the live Digg townhall tonight at 5:00pm PST/8:00pm EST.

For Everything Else There Is Mastercard [pic]

dansmc.com — Priceless...

show profanity settings
expand all
  • sotopheavy, on 10/11/2007, -125/+8This is funny, but seriously...Fry's doesn't take Mastercard... In fact if there is a single card a business does not take It is usually Mastercard... but hey "For everything else There is Mastercard.
    • thatsmyaibo, on 10/11/2007, -0/+49When you're old enough to apply for a credit card, you'll know there is hardly a place that doesn't take Visa or MC.
      • minigig, on 10/11/2007, -2/+11I Used a MasterCard at Fry's yesterday
        • zerhynn, on 10/11/2007, -3/+6Most places don't take Discover or American Express;

          Visa is accepted EVERYWHERE. Mastercard is virtually everywhere visa is with a few minor exceptions.
          • ahknight, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Visa and MasterCard's terms and rates are essentially identical, so if you agree to one through your card processor, you might as well take the other. However, AmEx and Discover rape the merchant with higher fees and restrictions, so only places that do high volume tend to take either one.
        • TheOther1, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2except allofmp3.com ;)
    • modpancake, on 10/16/2007, -2/+162002... in MY Digg? I don't think so.
      • reyalp, on 10/16/2007, -0/+3Centipedes? In MY vagina? It may be more common than you think.
    • tnoy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+14Mastercard is the only credit card that I have right now, and I've never found a place that does not accept it--minus the little cafe near my work that does not accept any kinds of credit/debit. If you think Fry's doesnt accept Mastercard then you must've never shopped there.
    • tnoy, on 10/11/2007, -14/+1Mastercard is the only credit card that I have right now, and I've never found a place that does not accept it--minus the little cafe near my work that does not accept any kinds of credit/debit. If you think Fry's doesnt accept Mastercard then you must've never shopped there.
    • indorock, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8you obviously live in norh america, because everywhere outside of there it's the exact opposite. MC s the de facto CC in Europe and Asia in any case. My Visa doesn't get as much playtime.

      but seriously, what an OT comment. We're talking about people who hate America. Terrorists? Discuss.
    • risktaker3, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2I just bought something from Fry's with a mastercard. That is the first card that I got and the one I use most often. I have yet to find a place that would not accept it.
    • shadus, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Everywhere that takes Visa takes Mastercard in my experience, a lot of places don't take Discover or American express, but even those places are dwindling.
  • AegisGFX, on 10/18/2007, -77/+939So everyone who dislikes America is a terrorist?
    • devou33, on 10/11/2007, -15/+159If thats what the media told him, then 'yes'.
    • carpespasm, on 10/11/2007, -19/+114that was my first thought too.
    • burgerboy06, on 10/11/2007, -165/+29A terrorist is a radical who employs terror as a political weapon. Buring a flag as such is instilling fear, thus creating terror. Sure, he could just be making a statement to his own people. But why would this be recorded if he did not want America to see it...terrorist.
      • hove, on 10/11/2007, -11/+144Your scared of people burning cloth? You must ***** yourself at a BBQ.
        • burgerboy06, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1its a symbol, jesus you people take things superficially.
        • burgerboy06, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1its a symbol, jesus you people take things superficially.
      • faskill, on 10/11/2007, -1/+45I'm not scared by him burning a flag. No terror involved. I am not pleased with him burning a flag either. Especially since the flag is my own.
        And uh, just so you know, Americans have burned flags as well. They weren't doing it to be "terrorists". They were doing it to make a point.
      • loves2spooge, on 10/11/2007, -4/+29So Bush along with most political leaders and news agencies are terrorists...
      • KlayBorg, on 10/11/2007, -1/+34Wow, they really have brainwashed you, haven't they?
        Its called a protest, people have always burnt flags at them, if that scares you, well that's just sad.
      • bluepepper, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Soon you'll be "terrorized" by people disagreeing with your views. Thus it'll be OK to deport them, torture them, or dispose of them.
      • Myonosken, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1In that case, all of America are a group of terrorists. They burnt so many ***** Union Jacks in the war.
      • Delphium226, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Your argument does not compute. You are thick.
    • sotopheavy, on 10/11/2007, -11/+101You just used a fallacious argument technique known as the Cheney. It's ok it has been happening a lot lately.
      • hellokittyownsu, on 10/11/2007, -1/+25I beg to differ, the Cheney defense is 00 buckshot to the face.
      • sotopheavy, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1That's the facial. It was popular in pornography before the VP began to use it.
    • Scoresheet, on 10/11/2007, -41/+6I think there's a difference between disliking America and Burning a Flag in front of a baying mob.
      • JCSaint, on 10/11/2007, -3/+25It's a form of protest.
      • trippinlikegod, on 10/11/2007, -2/+27Some of the most patriotic people in this country have burned that flag.
        • threemagic, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2that flag has been burned before.. wow.. that flag is my hero!
      • calbff, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1And an even bigger one when setting yourself on fire while burning a flag.
      • evilgeorgew, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1err...yeah...and there is a difference between disliking Jim Crow laws and marching on Washington for civil rights, disliking the Vietnam war and burning your draft card, disliking Chinese oppression and standing in front of a tank, disliking _____ (fill in the blank with an injustice) and _____(fill in blank with favorite method of public protest).
    • mrsblonde, on 10/11/2007, -60/+2haha take a look at the crowd and point out one person that "doesn't" look like a terrorist
    • spudnic, on 10/11/2007, -3/+53Not only that, but apparently he caught fire 'because' of this, implying some kind of divine intervention.
      • Reedan, on 10/11/2007, -14/+3/cue religion argument
        • jmp478, on 10/11/2007, -3/+15That's like your fourth /cue something joke... Cut it out.
        • jmp478, on 10/11/2007, -2/+14That's at least your 4th /cue something joke. Cut it out.
          • aaronm67, on 10/11/2007, -0/+19That's like your second "That's at least your 4th/cue something joke."
            Cut it out.
          • andre321, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1:)
    • gmprunner, on 10/11/2007, -27/+5There's a difference between disliking America and publicly burning an American flag in the middle of a mob.
      • mnrosebud, on 10/11/2007, -4/+15The difference is one is taking the time to protest where everyone else is just whining, right?
        BTW that's not really a mob, just concerned citizens. Aren't you concerned?
      • TheTaoOfBill, on 10/11/2007, -0/+24Burning an American flag does not make you a terrorist.
        • techmaster, on 10/11/2007, -19/+7But burning one in the middle of a bunch of unshaven brown people wearing ninja outfits does.
          • donnyburnside, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3That made me laugh in a sick kinda way. Cue digg down.
    • EXreaction, on 10/11/2007, -4/+9I think this is the first ever reply by AegisGFX that was actually dug up...

      Congrats.
      • Firehed, on 10/11/2007, -2/+18You guys pay attention to usernames? Jeez, glad to see there isn't any prejudice here.
        • Myonosken, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4You just recognise the few retards that hang around who always get -300+ diggs.
    • over9, on 10/11/2007, -2/+18I guess this makes all these people here terrorists as well.
      http://www.theodora.com/flags/new8/flag_burning_1.html
      Oh look, someone from Washington is burning a flag in a mob.
      • J4k3, on 10/11/2007, -4/+1Yeah, they are. Burning a flag is a federal offense, and scumbags like that should be prosecuted. Plus, if you're American, you should have a little more respect for your country. I don't give a ***** if you like the president or not, where I come from you'd beaten to death if you were caught burning our flag.
        • slingshot79, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3That would be the south, right?
        • elmetald00d, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Funny you should mention, J4k3. Burning the American Flag is 100% legal as long as you own the flag you burn. Check the law before you make assumptions, in other countries it might be crazy to do but here, it's legal.
    • lolcat77, on 10/11/2007, -12/+7Did anyone else see Jesus in the flames?
    • rholloway, on 10/11/2007, -4/+7Yes, anyone who doesn't like America is a terrorist. Including you. Now smile big, I'm shooting video of you now from a black helicopter.
      PS: That whole tinfoil hat thing? Doesn't work.
    • discourse, on 10/11/2007, -17/+3THE NEW COMMENT SYSTEM SUCKS
      • fxspec06, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1It's actually not as bad as it used to be. But buried as wrong topic.
      • Monk22, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1because your stupid, click the button labeled expand tree or whatnot
    • Asianwaste, on 10/11/2007, -7/+3no, just any Muslim who doesn't like America.
    • rotarychainsaw, on 10/11/2007, -0/+20No, everyone with a beard is a terrorist.
      • hshadow914, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1or a hippie, but i dont know which one is worse...
      • sshanafe, on 10/11/2007, -0/+16Santa Claus. You Bastard.
    • moonlessrat, on 10/11/2007, -2/+12If disliking America qualifies you as a terrorist then I am screwed......along with most of the rest of the world! ......sure American people are nice enough, but your foreign policy and government are a very unfunny joke.
      • cartman005, on 10/11/2007, -15/+2I say, if you dislike America, GET OUT. No one is making you live here. You may not agree with certain decisions our leaders are making but thats what is so great about America is that we CAN disagree. If you'd rather live in a pile of sand, be my guest.
        • totiM, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8Apparently we can't disagree without hearing 'GET OUT' from people who don't bother to digest, or even listen to, the argument. He makes a clear distinction that he -disagrees- with the foreign policy and government. Oh yeah, and he's from Sweden. =]
        • djm101, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3..because the rest of the world is a pile of sand, right.
          I guess you were referring to the Middle East, in which case, you're still wrong - as you would know if you'd travelled anywhere outside of the box you live in.
        • slingshot79, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1yes, maybe you can. but would it make a difference? and may I remind you of the post a few days ago how the bush administration takes care of protestors. being put in jail for wearing a t-shirt with an anti-bush statement.
      • Endemoniada, on 10/11/2007, -1/+11So America is great because you're allowed to disagree with eachother without getting flamed? And at the same time, anyone who DOESN'T agree should get out of the country? Huh? What?

        Buried for... sheer stupidity.
    • thedragon4453, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0I hope not, because a rapidly increasing amount of Americans must be joining al qaeda as we speak if that is the case.
    • cryemoxkidcry, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Well, yeah, haven't you read the Partriot Act?
    • evilgeorgew, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1The US government has worked hard to plant the idea that if you are of middle-eastern descent then you are a terrorist. It makes it politically much easier to drop bombs on middle eastern countries. The government did the same thing when they were exterminating the Native American populations. It was also done to anyone of Asian descent during WW II. Fascism sucks.
  • chopenik, on 10/18/2007, -34/+233You're either with us or you're with the terrorists. Now.... I consider Bush and Cheney the biggest terrorists (if you actually look at the true definition of the word) out there. What does that make me?
    • ayeroxor, on 10/11/2007, -2/+34Guantanamo-bait?
    • 808blogger, on 10/11/2007, -26/+5an idiot who believes in "moral equivalence" arguments. you obviously believe in multiple truths
    • Scully1981, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8I'm neither with you or against you. I don't know you so I'm neutral. Are people who couldn't give a ***** about you terrorists too?
    • texaspeaks, on 10/11/2007, -17/+2A digeral.

      "Digerals aren't interested in intelligent debate. They'd rather insult those with whom they disagree by comparing them with the most evil and ignorant people in history, thus exposing their own evil and ignorance."
      • fluoro, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7Sorry to interject, but I have to point out that you just insulted him (who, I presume, you disagree with) rather than engaging in any intelligent debate. Does that qualify you as a digeral as well?
    • tehpwnrate, on 10/11/2007, -19/+5"I consider Bush and Cheney the biggest terrorists (if you actually look at the true definition of the word) out there. What does that make me?"
      An idiot, or perhaps an ignoramus.
    • Sexton65, on 10/11/2007, -13/+2Uneducated?
    • BuckyDent, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4ct
    • mky5439, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3Only Sith deal in absolutes.
  • whatthefu, on 10/11/2007, -44/+428That terrorist thing killed the joke. Buried.
    • MarkCiccone, on 10/11/2007, -4/+41Seriously. Burning a flag makes me a terrorist? The Constitution seems to disagree..
    • mentalsticks, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0What 'joke'? A guy being on fire?
      To me that's about as funny as a drowning puppy, no matter if he's protesting against the US or not.
    • sotopheavy, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I think despite the terrorist comment the complete and utter backFIRE is why this is funny. The title should have been "Guy gets Pwned by old glory"
  • cowcowmoomoo1, on 10/18/2007, -24/+219Buried for being as old as the internet
    • andrewa, on 10/11/2007, -16/+4Dugg down for being another pointless comment about being old. I know you will see this comment almost immediately as you are pressing refresh on your browser every 5 seconds to monitor all stories that hit Digg....
    • bongo, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9i couldn't decide to bury it as 'lame' or 'duplicate'. I wish I could bury it for both reasons.
    • drafhk, on 10/11/2007, -0/+6My goodness. I think this was on Funnyjunk when I was in 5th grade.
  • SurrealDream, on 10/11/2007, -26/+80Aside from the unnecessary terrorist comment, that's hilarious >_<
    All together now...PWNED!
    • greenblob, on 10/11/2007, -0/+6Yes, this picture doesn't work well for a Mastercard commercial, but just add a big fat "PWN'D" to the picture and it'd be an excellent addition to the PWN'D gallery along with the picture of a girl getting bitten in the chest.
    • Kranklin, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1Yeah.. hate to hurt those terrorists feelings or be politically incorrect
      /sarcasm

      Not saying that guy is a terrorists, but you need to lighten up.
  • wildfire, on 10/11/2007, -9/+3As Gallagher would say, "I didn't come here to burn..."
  • tilleyrw, on 10/11/2007, -21/+3There's not a mention of MasterCard at all.

    Submitter is sleeping with GW Bush and doing Speedballs off the floor.
    • Light0, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4Check the bottom, buddy...
    • mtheoryx83, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5Wow. And these people are breeding. RTFA *****.
  • bluedemon31, on 10/11/2007, -19/+8***** hilarious!!!!!!!!!
  • JonnyTrombone, on 10/11/2007, -16/+10(Picture of tan man with beard) + (generic anti-semitic statement) = win
    • dclowd9901, on 10/11/2007, -3/+6There was nothing in the text that mentioned Jews or Judaism. How is it anti-semitic?
      • D4r7h3v1l, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8Moslems are also Semitic people.
        • worldofsmut, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2That's nice, however completely irrelevant to the term antisemitism, which has only ever referred to Jews.
          Look up the history of the term.
      • JonnyTrombone, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3anti-semitic doesn't mean just Jews. The term is used to mean any of the Semitic religions, including Judaism, Islam, Samaritanism, etc.
        • ctrlv, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2actually before you inform people what "the term" means, i suggest looking it up in any dictionary
        • worldofsmut, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2That is absolutely false.
          The term antisemitism has only ever referred to hatred of Jews.
          It is a recent argument that "antisemitism" also refers to Arabs or Muslims, and therefore Arab antisemitism cannot possibly exist (even though Muslims frequently call for a genocide of the Jews). Essentially, it's easier for Muslims to reinvent history and terminology, to combat antisemitism, than it is to stop teaching their kids how to hate Jews.

          Hell, even Wikipedia gets it right:
          German political agitator Wilhelm Marr coined the related German word Antisemitismus in his book "The Way to Victory of Germanicism over Judaism" in 1879. Marr used the phrase to mean hatred of Jews or Judenhass, and he used the new word antisemitism to make hatred of the Jews seem rational and sanctioned by scientific knowledge.
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism

          Please stop spreading such arrant disinformation.
          • fluoro, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1The real history of the term dates back before there were Muslims or Christians to lay claim to part of the term, as "semites" were mostly Jews. It dates back to King Ahab, who used the term against the Prophet Elijah for opposing him. When Elijah opposed him, King Ahab claimed that he was opposing Israel and all Jews. For that reason, the term isn't strictly limited to being against Jews. It is very frequently used to talk about opposition against the state of Israel.

            That said, I happen to see no issue with using the term in a way that is implied by the word itself rather than a strict historical context. It makes perfect sense to use it against anyone of Semitic descent, including Arabs. Just because we've been conditioned to a certain definition that doesn't make sense doesn't mean we should stick with it. We should use it in a sensible way. But that's just my opinion.. if you'd rather use it strictly how it's popularly used, I understand that as well. But just be aware that this definition can apply to those who disagree with Israel, and as such there many anti-Semites out there who have nothing against Jews as a people but strongly disagree with the policies of Israel.
  • xike, on 10/18/2007, -6/+319Buried for inaccurate: gas isn't $2.
    • ayeroxor, on 10/11/2007, -2/+18True. Like the bumper stickers say, "When Bush Took Office, Gas Was $1.46"
      • Monk22, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1because GW himself has a big price lever he sets the gas price with everyday. it doesnt have anything to do with opec.
    • bdbr, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4It was, way back when this page was created.
    • gunslinger37, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1i find it hard to believe that the lighter cost more than the gas lol
  • cardyology, on 10/11/2007, -28/+6Patriotic *****. Dugg.,
  • roflcawpter, on 10/11/2007, -17/+33***** old as hell. buried.
  • Poweroft, on 10/11/2007, -17/+56Burning a U.S. flag doesn't make you a terrorist. But it is funny.
    • evilbob333, on 10/11/2007, -5/+5In Soviet America, flag burn you.
      • gunslinger37, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2that was about | | this close to being a good joke
    • mandarin, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Well it doesnt exactly provide you a good profile in the eyes of the western world either...
  • purrp, on 10/11/2007, -10/+70Going through the American school system and writing a sentence like "Catching yourself on fire because you are a terrorist" ---> priceless.

    Yeah, digg me down. Not my fault I'm allergic to stupidity.

    Funny picture though.
  • JusticeAK, on 10/11/2007, -12/+129burning a flag is not a act of terror
    • ayeroxor, on 10/11/2007, -1/+30Careful. The same people who think it is now think you're committing treason.
    • JCSaint, on 10/11/2007, -3/+24I buried your comment by accident. Why can't I unbury comments?
      • Reedan, on 10/11/2007, -2/+42Because at the end of the day it doesn't really matter.
        • ruddy, on 10/11/2007, -7/+6either way your voting for a giant douche or a turd sandwhich
          • twisterrust, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2lol, dont know why ppl are digging you down, nice South Park Ref
        • holygram, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4If I could digg your comment a million times, I wouldn't.


          :/
        • gd1z, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2That was the best comment I've read all day.
    • TheRingmaster, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3Its probably more of a humorous thing than the person who wrote that actually having the belief that flag burning = terrorism
    • Endeavorer, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I thought it was terrifying...
    • hitmonval, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0In fact, it's a protected form of speech.
    • Armitage2k, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1bet that guy doesn't really care to be around fire anymore....
  • Unclickable, on 10/11/2007, -10/+4here is another failed attempt http://yuxt.com/videos/122325
  • MatchStick, on 10/11/2007, -15/+5we don't need no water, let that ***** burn!!!
  • The0, on 10/11/2007, -7/+116Wow, Mastercard parodies make the front page? Thats pathetic.

    Whats next? "AMAZING: Y2K WILL KILL US ALL"
    • kosmoX, on 10/11/2007, -0/+13Psst....is it safe to come out yet?
    • ruley, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2Breaking: Amazing Y2K will KILL US ALL. no-name French Politician blames Bush
    • SirBryce, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1You forgot the "TOP 10 THINGS YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT [WITH PICS!]"
  • ayeroxor, on 10/11/2007, -1/+40Submitter must not have had email since late 2001.
    • Kabrabnzada, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Whatever dude. If enough people have not seen it, and they enjoy it. I do not see the harm in submitting it.
  • Aric69, on 10/11/2007, -3/+7old
  • nevesis, on 10/11/2007, -4/+37hahaha, read the hosting site's main page: http://dansmc.com

    especially read his incoherent "WHY WE FIGHT" rant.

    excerpt: "Think on this. In the USA we just don't kill each other like so many other countries love to do. How many people has Europe lost to war in the last century ? The US is composed of many different states. I live in Idaho, and I just can't remember the last time we slipped over the boarder into our neighbor, Washington state, to rape, plunder and pillage. Perhaps it's time for others to listen to us."
    • nevesis, on 10/11/2007, -0/+29hahah, he offers computer security tips too! (http://www.dansmc.com/computer_security.htm)

      "Windows 98 has, they tell me, something over 65,000 ports. That's not a typo... 65,000 of those little beggars, and any one of them can let someone into your computer."

      "Well, the evil empire (MS) has tried to get into my computer and there are a lot of others."

      "I NEVER install ANY operating system updates from MicroSoft. Nada, nothing. Now check this out. I have never had any real problems with viruses, spyware, whatever."
      • reddy4it, on 10/11/2007, -0/+23this is way funnier than the picture!!!!

        good work nevesis... this is more worthy of digg's front page than the lame picture.
    • CircleFusion, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3"The people that say we shouldn't have gone into Iraq are the same ones who gave into Hitler."

      What the...???
    • hitmonval, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1HAHAHAHA- He's a redneck for sure.
    • Matthew720, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Actually, the grammatical mistakes the author on the linked page makes are popular among Hebrew speaking Israelis. "Think on this", for example, translates verbatim to Hebrew. In Hebrew, "on" and "about" are the same.

      What's amusing is that he keeps saying "us" and referring to himself as an American.

      If you're going to promulgate propaganda and masquerade as an American, at least get your grammar right.
  • supermajic, on 10/11/2007, -4/+8Someone relink this without the mastercard reference and claims the guy is a terrorist. Buried.
  • Jugalator, on 10/11/2007, -19/+2Uncle Sam pwns another one. ;-)
    • JCSaint, on 10/11/2007, -1/+8Yeah, because we totoally pwned Vietnam and Iraq. And North Korea and Iran are just begging to do what we ask.
  • scrolltom, on 10/11/2007, -12/+21Why do people find this funny? The guy will most likely suffer from serious burns, and may even die from it. Burning the American flag in protest does not make him a terrorist. Would you prefer that he burn up something else instead?
    • sabach, on 10/11/2007, -17/+3No, himself will do fine.
    • reddy4it, on 10/11/2007, -3/+11could not agree with you more.
    • philipl411, on 10/11/2007, -11/+2Yes its funny! I love it every time I see it. Never gets old to see the loser going up in flames. What a waste of the flag. his life? no waste at all
    • ruddy, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2well if you wake up cant think of anything better to do than to burn an american flag, im not complaining.
    • chestercoop, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0I'd prefer him to burn a joint, and chill the ***** out.
    • hitmonval, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0Your sn is scroltom... are you serious?
    • joemommasfat, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1What don't you get?

      It's funny because he made himself look foolish while attempting to insult someone else.

      It's called irony.
  • Kyderdog, on 10/11/2007, -7/+15At least it wasn't an American flag. Seems to be a few star short.
    Maybe they are just burning the southern states and Texas
  • joshmoney, on 10/11/2007, -5/+0They should have read this first

    http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Ready-to-Burn_20Flag#1015699720
  • namelessuno, on 10/11/2007, -10/+3Federal flags need to be burned as they symbolize the antithesis of liberty and such.
  • BlackStar77, on 10/11/2007, -1/+16$2.50? That's one pricey lighter.
  • ithasacarb, on 10/11/2007, -17/+2If you have George Bush then no you are not a terrorist..If you hate the USA just cause it is the USA, then yes in my eyes you are terrorist scum. Hopefully whatever god you believe in throws you down the right hole when it's all over.
    • reddy4it, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4So you're fairly safe if you don't believe in god....

      phew thank god for that :)
      • ithasacarb, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2Ha funny but that's not what I meant by that. I have not read the Qaraun but I don't believe that Allah would want his people to murder in his name.
        • rnwen2750, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2And Jesus would?
        • Monk22, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1maybe but he sure didnt say anything like this

          [9:14] You shall fight them, for GOD will punish them at your hands, humiliate them, grant you victory over them, and cool the chests of the believers.
          -koran
        • KlayBorg, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1And the Bible says this:
          Duteronomy 13 6-9::

          13:6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
          13:7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; 13:8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
          13:9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
          13:10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die;
        • Monk22, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1and i win becuase i just proved that religion is rediculous and only good for a mean of control over large groups of people.
    • mlostracco, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4The God that Muslims believe in is the exact same God that Jews and Christians believe in. The same one from the exact same dusty books.
  • ibone, on 10/11/2007, -5/+16Why are you a terrorist if you express yourself by burning a flag? I dont see any guns or bombs in that photo.
    • pintomp3, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6guns and bombs are not required to be labeled a terrorist these days. any form of dissent is considered terrorism now. just being brown with a beard will suffice also.
      • balaurul, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1u haven't seen bombs but 9/11 happened
        what do u think it means to burn someone's official symbols? friendship ????
  • sodascape, on 10/11/2007, -6/+21Buried... cause it's *****' stupid.
    • ithasacarb, on 10/11/2007, -5/+3Also buried cause it's ***** stupid.
  • Warptera, on 10/11/2007, -0/+14That's not even the American flag... That one only has eleven of the stripes and about 30 of the stars. : /
    • Spuy767, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1not to mention that half those stars appear to be those wacky jew stars.
  • 808blogger, on 10/11/2007, -14/+3the guy is more than likely a terrorist. What do you call this guy? a happy muslim practicing the religion of peace....
    this guy would blow any of us Americans up in a second if he had the chance. look at the situation in that picture clearly you PC fools
  • JCSaint, on 10/11/2007, -1/+9Just a thought on flag burning. As an American, I would never burn a flag in protest except for one reason: to protest an amendment against flag burning. I don't agree with it, but it's much worse to stifle a valid form of protest.
  • islingt0ner, on 10/11/2007, -10/+5Old Glory biting back.
  • Threlly, on 10/11/2007, -3/+26Patriot - "My Daddy died for that flag..."
    Bill Hicks - "Thats funny...I bought mine...and...its made in Vietnam...waddya know !"
    • Endemoniada, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1If I could, I'd digg you double. Bill Hicks is a genius.
  • Pritchard, on 10/11/2007, -6/+24Flag burners aren't terrorists, *****.
  • OswaldKenobi, on 10/11/2007, -5/+4should read "zealot fundamentalist."
  • Lumiras, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5Holy *****...this is seriously at least the second "...priceless" picture that has made the front page this week. Those things were funny 10 years ago, goddamnit, they're not funny now!
  • dantseytlin, on 10/11/2007, -8/+2hahaha that is priceless. If they had that happen in every episode of 24 I would watch
  • treeromeo, on 10/11/2007, -7/+2Wow, that's old. I first saw that when I was like 14.
  • daydozer, on 10/11/2007, -6/+3Ah, damnit. Why are the digg/bury so farking close.... How does one UNDIGG a comment? Weak sauce. I just promoted spam...
  • Tapewormz, on 10/11/2007, -6/+11Funny, but inacurate. Not everyone who burns a flag is a terrorist.
  • nikhilnidhi, on 10/11/2007, -0/+10This must be old as hell because I can't even remember the last time gas was $2.
  • tacklebox, on 10/11/2007, -18/+3Terrorist/muslim, same POS.
    • m0tbaillie, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3My mom's a Muslim (Turkish) and has a Ph.D. in English Literature and was probably more well-read by the time she was 20 - in a second language - than you will ever be. You saying she's a terrorist too, *****?
  • over9, on 10/11/2007, -3/+5More flag burning pictures to put things into perspective
    http://www.theodora.com/flags/new8/flag_burning_1.html

    It's not only limited to the Middle East. Everyone from Russia to USA are doing it.
  • elsJake, on 10/11/2007, -3/+20Burning down a flag in protest is NOT terrorism.
    • one2gamble, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2but what exactly is one protesting by burning a flag.

      Seems like a crappy form of protest, especially when you suffer third degree burns as a result.
      • balaurul, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1you should know that burning the flag means you declare war to that country
        well ... thx God some ppl realy use diplomacy and not only lighters
        • SilentRamble42, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2So I have the power to declare war? Liechtenstein better watch itself.
        • Delphium226, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1According to which state/federal/international law? Do you have a link backing up your assertion or shall we assume you don't really know what you are talking about?
  • TheDHC, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0you all still pimpin this link? this came out a few months after 9/11
    buried for old
  • gibson424, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5if i had magical jedi powers, i would remove the word "terrorist" from the English language. seeing that word thrown around so carelessly is embarrassing.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 131 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.