116 Comments
- inactive, on 11/17/2008, -15/+132***** Hate by Numbers.
- lxrhee, on 11/17/2008, -4/+82I go to Stewart and Colbert for my pun-filled news, thank you very much.
- quidpro, on 11/17/2008, -9/+81Was that going to be another hate by numbers? I saw the words somewhere on the screen and then prevented whatever it was from loading with a swift kick to the back button.
- IanG73, on 11/17/2008, -10/+77One episode left.
I'm looking forward to it, because hopefully it'll be the last "Hate by Numbers" episode that ever hits the internet. This ***** isn't funny, it's boring, and his voice makes me want to punch him in the throat. - ani625, on 11/17/2008, -8/+48"CNN doesn't want Gladstone to go on sabbatical either"
Apparently, the rest of the world does. - jnorris441, on 11/17/2008, -11/+50I really ***** hate the guy in these videos
- PhoenixReborn, on 11/17/2008, -5/+37Buried for Hate By Numbers.
- sorenchr, on 11/17/2008, -3/+28This guy is actually more annoying than what he is reporting
- HappyScrappy, on 11/17/2008, -4/+28First time I saw this guy and one thing struck me. This just isn't funny.
Any humor there actually is (and there's very little) is from the original stories he is splicing in. This Hate By Numbers story is the video equivalent of blogspam. He doesn't add any content himself, just takes credit for others' work. - zhallock, on 11/17/2008, -4/+25At least they have that intro screen to give you a chance to kill it, which of course is what I did as well. They should change the name from "Hate by Numbers" to "Suck"
- Gr00ver, on 11/17/2008, -2/+22As do we all.. as do we all.
- mmcgrath, on 11/17/2008, -3/+21Buried for douchbaggary.
- stevenbrown, on 11/17/2008, -3/+18Insert obligatory comment about Gladstone being a douche bag
- SuperTonic, on 11/17/2008, -6/+20I'm sorry cracked, I love ya, but "hate" is just awful.
- reyoo30309, on 11/17/2008, -3/+17I hate when reporters use puns. I'm not sure who they are trying to impress by labeling every story that has to do with Pandas as "Pandamonium." Enough already, we get it!
- derekmas10, on 11/17/2008, -1/+13kept waiting for funny.
FAIL - borez, on 11/17/2008, -5/+16How does this ***** ever get to the front page? Oh well at least he's nearly fixed the sound problems, it's gone from sounding like it was recorded in a large toilet to sounding like it was recorded in a small pantry, not bad, but no cigar as yet.
- ani625, on 11/17/2008, -2/+12@Gladstone
I am no troll, I just think your show is no good, and so do many other diggers.
Sure there are fans, and hence your bragging rights.
The link just shows why the person gives you unconditional support.
Lets not turn this into a bitter argument. -With thx - oboredone, on 11/17/2008, -2/+12I kinda thought they already did that on election day with that retarded Will.I.Am hologram. . .
- mlvassallo, on 11/17/2008, -0/+10Why must you people dig Gladstone? You are just encouraging him...
- hammerpants, on 11/17/2008, -2/+11It's actually kind of sad that Gladstone (or a troll pretending to be him) is in here arguing with people leaving him negative feedback. I left a negative comment already, but, if you're reading this, it's best to take criticism with a little grace. Arguing with people on internet forums reinforces any notions of you being a...well, a douche.
- hammerpants, on 11/17/2008, -1/+10They do. It's called Hate by Numbers.
- stevenbrown, on 11/17/2008, -0/+9Don't click it its one of those lame sites you have to give to 30 friends to see the pictures.
- Chicken, on 11/17/2008, -1/+10Someone should make a series that makes fun of hate by numbers.
- hammerpants, on 11/17/2008, -0/+8I won't watch a video with that Gladstone guy in it. He's never ever funny or insightful.
- davidwasman, on 11/17/2008, -1/+9HBN should be officially killed for bad delivery of puns and a douchebag for a host.
- peruvianidol, on 11/17/2008, -0/+8Buried for 2:30 of my life I'll never get back.
- agsinger, on 11/17/2008, -1/+8that would be "you're" not "your"
- Davers, on 11/17/2008, -0/+7Interesting how Gladstone knows that everyone hates his videos, but he still posts them. I mean seriously, every comment talking about what an idiot he is gets a ton of diggs, and any comment from Gladstone at all gets negative diggs.
- inactive, on 11/17/2008, -0/+7Did anyone else click away the instant he started talking?
B-O-R-I-N-G! - Altair27, on 11/17/2008, -2/+9I really hate Gladstone because he takes stories that could easily be made fun of in a hilarious way and then presents them in the stupidest, least amusing way possible.
I mean I hate the guy for ruining things that could be hilarious, because he basically picks good material and ***** on it. It's like watching the daily show with all the good humor removed. - inactive, on 11/17/2008, -4/+11Not gonna watch it, hate by numbers is so bad. This guy is not funny considering he has a script in front of him.
- inactive, on 11/17/2008, -4/+11CNN is not journalism, it's entertainment.
- sx66gns, on 11/17/2008, -4/+11And I HATE this ***** dude.
- Deeh, on 11/17/2008, -2/+8Hate by numbers sucks ass, I don't know who diggs this stuff.
- MasterGrief, on 11/17/2008, -1/+7Hey, it's nice to see Gladstone actually say something on this issue! I have nothing against you man, but I'm gonna have to agree with the minority here. Not really a fan. You're not doing anything to me, though, so I'm certainly not gonna try and stop you.
- inactive, on 11/17/2008, -0/+6***** you *****.
- crweaks23, on 11/17/2008, -1/+6Acting special about 600 - 2000 diggs? ...really??
In the last 24 hours, more diggs have been given to a picture of a pie ("accurate pie chart"), an Onion article about God clarifying his stance on murder, and an article about a robber getting his ass beat after tryin to steal a laptop. Now, don't get me wrong, it's an accomplishment to make it on digg consistently, but mrbabyman can get a picture of a grapefruit on digg on a daily basis without much effort... so tossing it out there like it's some daunting task makes you sound a little... pathetic, although that may be too harsh a word.
As for your partner lounsey here, I don't really get her. It may be true that "haters" are more vocal, but I'd argue that most people don't like the videos, but don't care enough to comment either way. I watched this video and a couple of the others, and I think they're all poorly done. Maybe you just have a minority of vocal supporters, when in reality the majority of people are unimpressed, but are too indifferent to even bother giving their opinion. You won't get better if you believe something is good when it isn't.
Or maybe I'm wrong? I dont really care. In fact, I didnt digg or bury this article, have never commented before about it on either cracked or on here, and probably won't ever again... just like the majority of people who've seen it. I guess that's the point. - Davers, on 11/17/2008, -0/+5I clicked away as soon as I saw the title screen.
- Annon, on 11/17/2008, -1/+6This is ***** awful. Second time I've been duped into clicking a hate by numbers link. Please include "gladstone" or "hate by numbers" in the titles of stories so they don't get promoted to the front page.
- MasterGrief, on 11/17/2008, -1/+5He said "apparently"....
- inactive, on 11/17/2008, -0/+4Now you don't have to send it to 30 people:
http://w2.hidemyass.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2thdG ...
NSFW - ClevelandBrown, on 11/17/2008, -0/+4***** thing sucks.
- WSPanic201, on 11/17/2008, -1/+5they killed journalism a looonnggg time ago
- brown705, on 11/17/2008, -0/+4Agreed.
- mrdude4290, on 11/17/2008, -5/+9Hate by Numbers officially kills two minutes and thirty seconds of my life
- annhltr, on 11/18/2008, -0/+3Gladstone and his minions raid Hate-By-Numbers Post
http://digg.com/people/Gladstone_and_his_minions_r ... - Markb3489, on 11/17/2008, -0/+3i don't even know how to watching
- MasterBeowulf, on 11/17/2008, -0/+3cindy lauper
/facepalm - synthaxx, on 11/17/2008, -5/+8That was punny.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 118 discussions



What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved