What is Digg?198 Comments
- inactive, on 08/28/2008, -2/+142what is web 3.0?
a buzzword with no real meaning.
it's not like everyone's going to get a dialog saying
"a new version of web is available (3.0) would you like to upgrade?"
it's just going to be a gradual adoption of new technology, like css and svg was…
add some new code, and it's suddenly a new version of the internet! please. - RogerStrong, on 05/09/2008, -1/+120Web 3.0 is the next means-whatever-you-want-it-to-mean buzzword used to attract investors.
- Planets, on 05/09/2008, -3/+108Buried for using the sensationalist, cliche "revolution" title.
- ubernoggin, on 05/09/2008, -1/+97I'm already using Web 4.0, so I don't see what the big deal is.
- bsander, on 05/09/2008, -0/+46Web 4.0 = Profit!
- psevium, on 05/09/2008, -1/+43Who else is hoping the term dies a fiery death soon?
- travis6690, on 05/09/2008, -3/+40Will Web 3.0 have holographic porn?
- centinall, on 05/09/2008, -2/+39No need to be so anti-semantic.
- agisten, on 05/09/2008, -6/+39More like web 0.3 .... Long way to go to real web revolution...
- yellowfish04, on 05/09/2008, -0/+26thanks, you just saved me 8 minutes
- meman2, on 05/09/2008, -4/+25Dugg in hopes that the Web 2.0 term will get replaced by anything, anything at all, even if it's Web 3.0
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -2/+23So basically, more web apps and ***** social networking services. *****.
- bnbr, on 05/09/2008, -0/+20Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Web 3.0
Web 3.1
Web For Workgroups 3.1
Web NT 3.1
Web For Workgroups 3.11
Web NT 3.5
Web NT 3.51
Web 95
Web NT 4.0
Web 98
Web 98 SE
Web 2000
Web Me
Web XP
Web Vista
Web 7 - venicerocco, on 05/09/2008, -1/+21Is this like color TV?
- MaxP3, on 05/09/2008, -8/+28"Web 3.0 is frequently referred to as an environment consisting of intelligent web-based semantic applications..."
- newstart, on 05/09/2008, -2/+21No thank you. I am still waiting for Web 2.0, Service Pack 2
- datagod, on 05/09/2008, -1/+20Web 3.0 will add bump maps to your web pages, and 8.1 channel surround sound to your mouse clicks.
- GBRob08, on 05/09/2008, -0/+18Web 3.0 = Skynet
- jer2eydevil88, on 05/09/2008, -1/+18Oooowh they have The Internet on computers now!
- fkr3, on 05/09/2008, -1/+16Web 2.0 is just a word idiots say to each other while they pat each other on the back and congratulate each other on their supreme awesomeness for including some big, bloated but popular javascript library across their awesome, life-changing application that takes your to do list, adds collaberation features on the remote chance that *anyone* gives a flying ***** what you're doing today, and spits out a link you can click on on your cellphone to view your list rendered as a jpg converted to a pdf outputted as html.
The list of attributes these retards have decided "define" web 2.0 are all stupid and pre-date their precious buzzword by a decade or more. It's not design elements, it's not "new technologies" like "ajax" or "php", it's not users submitting ***** or "social networking" aka "add friend" and "message friend" buttons.
Web 2.0 *was* the evolution of business models post-bubble, now it's just a marketing buzzword that approximately means "yet another way to do some crap you never needed to do before". - patthew, on 05/09/2008, -1/+15Web 3.0 is corners so round our monitors will turn in on themselves into a black hole so dense not one cent of venture capital will be able to escape.
- inactive, on 05/09/2008, -3/+16It's about reducing the noise
- Shogi, on 05/09/2008, -2/+13At least it ain't BREAKING!!!!
- doshindude, on 05/09/2008, -0/+9I got the leaked Web 5.0b1.
- MacSuxWindozSux, on 05/09/2008, -0/+9It's just another sales pitch. It doesn't mean anything specific.
- YamiJim, on 05/09/2008, -3/+12i am debating making more accounts to dig you up more, i am so ***** sick of this god damn market hype *****. the web is the web, they only version difference you could EVER logically make was the jump from ascci BBSs to graphical browsers and untill i'm jaking into some sort or brain scaning 3d broswer or some sort, then no web 3.0 does not exist.
- known, on 05/09/2008, -0/+9Web 1.0 = synchronous communication on web.
Web 2.0 = asynchronous communication on web.
Web 3.0 = ?. - aMammoth, on 05/09/2008, -2/+10Ah, I hate stupid terms like 2.0 3.0. Where's my web 2.1? Are we just going to go right to 3.0? I think I might copyright web 4.0, then become a millionare!!
- nkm82, on 05/09/2008, -0/+8Torrent plz!
- TheLD, on 05/09/2008, -1/+9Buried as plagiarism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2 - hellathatguy, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7system already went online august 4th, 1997
- Aensland, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7BREAKING: Web 3.0, the upcoming revolution.
There, fixed. - ElbertF, on 05/09/2008, -0/+7Then it's no longer noise is it?
- Southcoast247, on 05/09/2008, -1/+7Web versions aren't the declaration of a certain visual style. Glassy just happens to be whats trendy, but there are plenty of Web 2.0 sites that aren't glassy and reflective. Web versions are based on the dominant use and development of certain technologies and web softwares. For example, Myspace and Digg are Web 2.0 websites because of their networking and information sharing capabilities. I'm sure there will be glass and reflection in Web 3.0 as well, since this is a Post-Modern design era and people just slosh asthetics together.
- johanm, on 05/09/2008, -1/+7actual working semantic web will take a while. and when it works i sure f*cking hope it wont be called web 3.0
- digitaldan87, on 05/09/2008, -1/+6-- halographic rick roll.
- profcornbread, on 05/09/2008, -0/+6I couldn't agree more. As a web designer I am so sick of "whatever" 2.0. Stop it. Shut up.
- broysox, on 05/09/2008, -0/+5sweet copy and paste job from wikipedia
- mijelh, on 05/09/2008, -2/+7"right now everything is god dam 2d"
Fortunately - mudgie, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5Web 2.0 has no clear definition, so tacking 3.0 on the end doesn't mean *****. User interaction has always been apart of the Internet, there's just more technology behind it now. I don't call my car a Vehicle 4.5 Alpha 3 Rendition 1C because it has electric windows and a GPS.
Blog and podcast are also stupid terms. Who's the ***** who keeps making these pseudo-words popular? - YamiJim, on 05/09/2008, -3/+7WEB3.0 IS PEOPLE!!!!!
- lincolnluxor, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4SEED!!!
- MrTito, on 05/09/2008, -1/+5WTF is Shpinn? Hmm, all the article links go to Sphinn.com... "Internet Marketing News & Discussion Forums".
Oh, spam. Buried as such. - drakethegreat, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4Buzz words, *****, buzz words, and you get the picture. This article is a crapload of BS where they ask people who have been successful what they think the future will entail and nobody has a clue. Why don't we let the future occur and stop pretending like we can predict it...
- fuhlavaflave, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4"Did someone just open a vault and then close it?"
"No, I just double-clicked." - ByteGuerilla, on 05/09/2008, -0/+4Indeed.
I had to write a paper on the Semantic Web recently. The crux of the criticism is well-argued in this article by Clay Shirky: http://www.shirky.com/writings/semantic_syllogism. ... - sint4x, on 05/09/2008, -0/+3Web 3.0 = more asynchronous communication on web.
- Hangly, on 05/09/2008, -3/+6A buzzword and a marketing gimmick.
- noahgelman, on 05/09/2008, -1/+4To be honest, that would probably work
-
Show 51 - 100 of 197 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is