19 Comments
- richstyles, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13It loads way quicker than the original too! lol
- alex.bosworth, on 10/12/2007, -1/+14From a netscape developer lol
- jasnmb, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8"1.) This list is based off of users with recent activity. It may not contain users who haven't done anything in a long time."
So it's actually BETTER than Digg's top user list was. :D - mckoss, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Information wants to be free.
- cfinke, on 10/12/2007, -3/+9;-)
- OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4[quote]So it's actually BETTER than Digg's top user list was[/quote]
It doesn't list # of comments. It'd also be great if it listed the average comment ratings. - runbmd, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6I digg this because I'm on it. I'm such a narcissist.
- HMTKSteve, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2It did hit the front page... Perhaps when it gets buried by staff it loses the time stamp for front page promotion?
- sicc, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2yay for the top diggers list!
Also, seems it's been buried already, maybe by the digg staff?
It has 104 diggs but no front page yet. = - jasnmb, on 10/12/2007, -2/+41.) I feel like it's missing some users. Yesterday I was #110, but now this says I'm #99. I've only had 1 story hit the front page in the last 24 hours and I wouldn't think that it would cause me to jump up 11 spots, but maybe I'm wrong.
2.) I smell a Cease and Desist letter coming - OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2It doesn't include inactive people. That's why you're ranked higher.
- shinynew, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Digging this so people will stop bitching.
- cfinke, on 10/12/2007, -2/+31.) This list is based off of users with recent activity. It may not contain users who haven't done anything in a long time.
2.) I wouldn't be surprised. We'll see. - seanthebond, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I think its a little inaccurate though. Its says I'm 78, but Digg says I'm 84.
- nullmind, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Does it not violate the digg terms of service? Does it respect robots.txt? Neither of which I care about, and I never cared about how much time anyone spent on digg (the content is more important)
- ldavid, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Yeh...I certainly can't see it existing for very long...
- PointGuard, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Do you think Digg will send out a Seize and deciese letter? (I can't spell...im 12)
- mrfreeziexp, on 10/12/2007, -9/+6This will be gone faster then you can say "cease and desist."
Here's the list:
1 digitalgopher
2 AlbertPacino
3 CLIFFosakaJAPAN
4 p9s50W5k4GUD2c6
5 aaaz
6 gwjc
8 MrBabyMan
9 bonlebon
10 chrisek
11 BloodJunkie
12 webtech
13 Aidenag
14 dirtyfratboy
15 koregaonpark
16 snipehack
17 zaibatsu
18 msaleem
19 webtickle
20 3monkeys
21 wayjer
22 curtissthompson
23 capn_caveman
24 parislemon
25 tommytrc
26 Gregd
27 johndi
28 TheAttacks
29 fatmike
30 tlmac59
31 IvanB
32 charbarred
33 zepequeno
34 OBKenobi
35 kevinrose
36 tomboy501
37 1gunit
38 DigiDave
39 schestowitz
40 JibberJabber
41 cambrown99
42 hemphill81
43 mklopez
44 giantAppleCore
45 Alexius
46 tysonhy
47 ndm007
48 drum_bum
49 Ostermayer
50 elebrio
51 fudgebrown
52 iFelix
53 sicc
54 sahaskatta
55 Brajeshwar
56 Geekforlife
57 savingadvice
58 attila
59 UCBearcats
60 ncaa76
61 starexplorer
62 srobbin
63 scottwills
64 slowspin
65 MrCalifornia
66 chad78
67 digger_twit
68 motang
69 mynickel
70 deviceguru
71 thedove
72 radicaldementia
73 jrepin
74 Tiabin
75 jobeats
76 EAMUS1CATULI
77 jefflundberg
78 seanthebond
79 skored
80 bluesaze
81 Aggressor
82 BoneyB
83 titlesaysitall
84 DiggityDugged
85 NJShadow
86 danhuard
87 dtang
88 runbmd
89 rodtrent
90 Avijit
91 jlegum
92 andru
93 ZaNkY
94 BigKitty
95 ozguralaz
96 antdude
97 iSlayer
98 stuntdubl
99 jasnmb
100 scoreboard27


What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved