digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Story and Screenshots about Digg.cn clone

wangr.com — Sorry if I shouldn't submit direct links to sites, but there wasn't a story available about it yet, so here I've wrote one! I went to the whole site and made screens to show you the copy of digg.com

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Testify.Alex, on 10/12/2007, -8/+80Lets see if they send a cease and desist to these guys like they did to digggames.com
    • Rub3X, on 10/12/2007, -3/+151China doesn't follow world copyright laws.
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -10/+13Well it does, but you have 18 months time to copyright your stuff around the world, if you don't do it within that time, somebody else can do it for any country.
    • Rub3X, on 10/12/2007, -6/+60What I meant was it's not enforced. The laws exist there of course but nobody enforces them.
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -33/+4if they're beeing sued it is, like FOXTown from switzerland and FOXtown in Shanghai, they got a settlement though, i don't exactly know what the settlement was.
      In the end, I don't think digg can do anything about the design or whatsoever, cuz it's the web, everybody copies everyone.
      You're right though, if digg wouldn't make a move they can't enforce it.
      But I do believe if you copy an idea, you could at least add some of your own flavour into it.
    • fudged71, on 10/12/2007, -31/+6haha... reading that opening paragraph gave me dajavu
    • dsendecki, on 10/12/2007, -9/+35Is that sort of like Déjà vu?
    • Rezzy, on 10/12/2007, -24/+4China doesn't NEED to follow copyright laws
    • BrokenBeta, on 10/12/2007, -22/+6http://www.duggmirror.com/tech_news/Story_and_Screenshots_about_Digg_cn_clone/
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -6/+62Why are Chinese obsessed with copying everything directly? Was it so difficult to come up with a different name and a slightly different interface like Netscape did?
    • Archeologist, on 10/12/2007, -10/+97If you think about it, digg is a democratic site. China is communist. You can almost smell the irony.
    • i440, on 10/12/2007, -19/+45好!
    • GuyHitByTruck, on 10/12/2007, -6/+47"In the end, I don't think digg can do anything about the design or whatsoever, cuz it's the web, everybody copies everyone."

      Try telling that to the RIAA.
    • skyhighrockets, on 10/12/2007, -5/+12All you really need to know from that site/blog is this.

      "www.digg.cn at first glance is just a copy of the name and the toolbar right?
      Well no, go to http://www.digg.cn/news.php or click any of the top right links to navigate through the whole site, it’s exactly the same, the system, the name, the design, the submission form, the comments, the login, everything is a 100% copy from digg.com"

      With a proper picture:
      http://img347.imageshack.us/img347/7664/wwwcndiggcom20060903mh0.jpg
    • Dested, on 10/12/2007, -17/+1To soon dude... to soon...
    • TNHitokiri, on 10/12/2007, -1/+26i honestly wouldnt have had a problem with this, but then i saw (c) 2004-2006

      now thats a bitch move to make
    • Nothlit, on 10/12/2007, -2/+9There is a huge difference between trademark and copyright. Please stop confusing the two.
    • CharlesDarwin, on 10/12/2007, -8/+17I would have chosen a better looking site to copy...
    • falcon707, on 10/12/2007, -9/+4"Why are Chinese obsessed with copying everything directly? Was it so difficult to come up with a different name and a slightly different interface like Netscape did?"

      Exibit A: Netscape (it sucks)
    • themastersb, on 10/12/2007, -10/+3I smell a lawsuit unless Diggs creators have something to do with this.
    • vezquex, on 10/12/2007, -11/+2LOL, another digg clone. http://www.technorati.com/tags/digg
    • kozie, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2@OBKenobi
      "different interface like Netscape did?"

      I read "like Netscape digg?"

      They would have paid them off and continued to use the name, that would have been better... It is probably what's going to happen anyway... (hope not!)
    • titlesaysitall, on 10/12/2007, -11/+2从Digg.cn, 与您性交美国人!!
    • rex3, on 10/12/2007, -17/+4and amerians dont copy directly, like "The Office" and other entertainment shows, like all the names of the citys... this is so hypoctrically, americans are full of them selves. there all in a bubble...
    • BradFive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Actually, the US version of the Office is made by the makers of the UK version. Not exactly copying.
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1Um... did anyone notice their Favicon? It's a skinny, yellow-colored version of the Digg guy.
  • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+20well that was more or less my thought here too, I mean this is actually not just digggames this is actually digg.cn, and besides the name everything is cloned.
  • nickhodge, on 10/12/2007, -26/+4So, you can download digg.com from bittorrent now? Cool.
  • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -25/+3can you? where did that come from?
  • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -2/+17The site has actually changed it's whole interface in less than ten hours
    http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_cn_changes_the_whole_site_in_less_than_ten_hours_after_beeing_on_digg/blog
  • hriwo, on 10/12/2007, -6/+5Much easier to read when in english (well for me)
    http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=http://www.cndigg.com/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=2&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dcndigg%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DG
    • blapierre, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10 Passengers on the exhumation
    • JackHererUK, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I am not sure that is any easier to understand when it has been "translated".
    • Strd, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5Hilarious ! You critic digg.com.
      Digg.cn :
      - Critics you!
      (in the right column, "What is dug off?")
    • loureiro97, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2after reading the site in english i get the feeling that the site is run by a crazy 16 year old chinese freak! And worst he's probably the only "digger" there!

      I mean who in their right mind would visit a news site that has headlines in the front page that are totally wacko , and most stories are submitted by guys with usernames as ***** lolhaha and omglol ???

      Besides most actual news stories come from the same sources.
  • miquonranger03, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5http://sea.search.msn.com/dnserror.aspx?FORM=DNSAS&q=digg.cn.
    • Xiol, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I think Mej was being sarcastic, you know.
  • inferno320, on 10/12/2007, -38/+9Support the Original digg.com - f*** the imposters in the a** !
    • mindless2, on 10/12/2007, -4/+47You can say ***** and ass- they are just words!
    • Mejogid, on 10/12/2007, -22/+15@mindless2

      There's a reason those words are hardly ever used on the web - they are blasphemous collections of letters used only by Satan and his followerers (and as such you should be burned at the stake). Furthermore, by using *'s in the place of letters, any sin and mal-intent is automatically negated since it is impossible to desipher the resulting collection of punctuation and letters.



    • eplawless, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11Satan likes it when you put random starting letters with a random number of asterisks, because it confuses people. J*****.
  • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -1/+15Digg.cn = chow fah hai!

    (The translation contains adult language)
    • rumor, on 10/12/2007, -27/+3haha.

      glad i've taken a few semesters of mandarin :)
    • mtcow, on 10/12/2007, -2/+22That's Cantonese.
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3it's canto not mandarin, zhou ni ma, i guess. ( in mandarin )
  • Nigh7mar3, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8its about 5 months that digg.cn is up
  • miquonranger03, on 10/12/2007, -1/+20well, it must be quite small; the front page stories have around 10 "votes".
    • Lorian, on 10/12/2007, -12/+3 You mean "票"? Can't really quote the translation.
    • BuddhaManFizz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8actually, the javascript function they use isint even "vote," its "diggit"
  • psylence, on 10/12/2007, -0/+74You're telling me someone from China copied a product and labeled it as their own? Holy crap!
  • Robmash, on 10/12/2007, -4/+14straight up carbon copy dude
  • Archeologist, on 10/12/2007, -7/+15In my opinion, this can be useful for people in China. We love digg, why can't they have a version in chinese? Maybe they could team up with digg.com and have digg go international. This could actually be not a bad idea.
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -2/+271. They shouldn't call it Digg.
      2. They shouldn't blatantly rip-off the Digg interface.

      I wonder what their Digg Spy looks like?
    • MyNightwish, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10I thought digg was already international, e.g. USA, UK, and countless other people come to digg from all over the world, its not just the USA. I guess you mean languages, but digg is already international in one way.
    • BassCadet, on 10/12/2007, -14/+10If you like Digg so much learn English like the rest of the international visitors who come to this site.
    • MrViklund, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7Respect copy right and get some creativity of your own for gods sake...
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1good idea, they should team up with digg,
      would take hella work to take all these previous diggs out i guess, or start clean?
    • bogomill, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4"Respect copy right"

      Yeah, because copying something is stealing... Oh, wait... Does that same logic apply when I make copies of copyrighted music and movies too?
    • vermin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Who said anything about stealing? Believe it or not copyright infringement is illegal, so yeah copying this website exactly and copying copyrighted movies/music is basically the same thing.
    • acoot, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I love China just for kicks
  • Branchex, on 10/12/2007, -4/+35The #1 dugg story every week, "Communism is better than capitalism!"
    Digg.cn, the site that uses super filters to protect you from "false" news stories.
    • copyright1968, on 10/12/2007, -3/+14I saw a few that reported just the opposite but the were also marked with

      ***Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate
      Censors have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate.
      The original submitter will be banned and then shot. His/her family will then be required to reimburse the government for the bullet.***
  • Dark_Ice, on 10/12/2007, -5/+22Finely something original from China. This is cutting edge folks. Never seen anything like it before! ... what do you mean digg.com? Whats that? Must be those evil americans copying those asians again, evildoers...
  • r2builder, on 10/12/2007, -6/+21I think the digg army should help take this down... eg: infultrate it with "stories" about goatse, lemonparty or tubgirl?
  • sjalloul, on 10/12/2007, -3/+11These guys did a straight copy of the entire Digg.com site! Well everything seems to be original creation of digg....the colors, the CSS style sheets, the functionality of the site, what else? JavaScript.....?!?! Will have to get back on that one.....
    • veritech, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4Your 100% right the css is a defo a cut and paste job, at least they didn't link back to the mothership for it.

      It's almost like they ran it through a translator, and changed all the string literals to chinese. and popped in a database, and fired it up.

      The javascript is the same,(same function names, and variables etc.), the only part i'll give them credit for is the backend (looks like php), and the opensource digg clone project, is still in alpha, so they didn't do a straight cut and paste job, but it certainly is funny.


  • alexrandall, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10I know digg is not yet fully mature in non-tech area but digg.com staff start thinking about expanding to international version. I saw a lot of submission in Chinese, Japanese German. At least they should start UK, Australia, and/or Canada versions.
    • monkeymad2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+26Why, we (UK, Australia, and Canada) all speak English?
    • ChileanGoD, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11Pas au Quebec, Tabarnak!
    • CBTF, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"At least they should start UK, Australia, and/or Canada versions."

      Digg isn't just Americans.. im sure we have just as many Canadians and UK citizens that post here... Making different sites defeats the point of the internet tubes.

      (A Canadian)
    • bilangew, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@ChileanGod: je m'attendais vraiment pas à ce genre de commentaire, lol!

      Seriously though, is it *really* a good idea to split up digg in localized sections? I mean, if digg.qc.ca sees the day someday, there will be like 50 active users at most :)
  • pixelfox, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1chinese buggers.
  • chicken101, on 10/12/2007, -3/+15UH oh, some of their stories have 7 diggs!

    /scared
    • Jugalator, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2They're probably going to get more popular now than before this story.
  • veccie, on 10/12/2007, -0/+24There's also a malaysian version: http://www.digg.com.my/
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11Hey, that one is actually in English.

      I think it's time that Digg, the real Digg, added some features these sites can't clone so easily.
    • trunkster, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9wow anime stories actually make the front page there
    • Everen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11From the front page:

      "Please note that we're not trying to compete with the official digg!"
    • CBTF, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1And who can resist? Just look at that grammar!
  • mikaelc, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7Wonder where digg.dk got their inspiration from?
  • dmron, on 10/12/2007, -10/+9Who gives a crap?
  • webonics, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8Terrible. I guess this is just a strong example why Digg is going to have to fiercely defend their name. The design can be protected as well as long as the site is copyrighted in that country and the country enforces the copyright.

    There are so many amazing Chinese artists and developers, its rather shameful that a such a rich culture is insulted by a few unoriginal and exploitative thieves.
    • Travelsonic, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1I agree, with everything... China should go its own route, be creative, come up with it's own thing. It is indeed a shame.
      "...such a rich culture is insulted by a few unoriginal and exploitative thieves. "

      You talk legalities, and mix copyright infringement, with theft... that loses credibility, if only small, in my book.

      Copyright infringement, as wrong as it is, legally is not the same as theft. Think it is like, or as bad as theft morally - nobody can change your morals, but comparing them factually is misleading for reasons beaten to death *glares at guy beating a dead horse*

      Keep emotion and fact clearly distinguished. :P
  • Strangers, on 10/12/2007, -1/+19"© 2004-2006 cndigg - all rights reserved 苏ICP备06024660号"

    Har har har
  • BuddyChrist, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4They wouldn't really have to do anything about this site. As I recall Kevin said he wasn't worried about clone sites, because they're never as good or successful as the original. I believe that to be correct.
    • porplem, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6But would you rather go to the original Digg or the one that's actually in your language?
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1they should clone the chinese clone and let me run it for them, i'd just take the credit.
    • BuddyChrist, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@porplem
      The original digg for sure. The cn digg doesn't mirror content, so you're not going to get all you could.
  • cam18, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Hmm. I feel torn on this issue. Maybe this well help spread the Digg type of community worldwide. Maybe Kevin Rose and the rest of the Digg guys could find some partners and go international. Or maybe they may sue the hell out of them for copying the site almost down to the domain name. I don't know about you guys, but Digg International sounds good to me.
    • vermin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Nobody is stopping people from making international versions of digg. Just don't call it digg, don't copy the design 100% and don't copy+paste the html/css/javascript code. People are free to make their own version of digg as long as they put in the work to make it from scratch like everyone else.
  • BehnoodMarvazi, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2Looks like they haven't upgraded to Digg version 3.0 yet.
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3they were, but 9 hours after this post they changed.
  • lakawak, on 10/12/2007, -6/+14Gee, this is eerily similar to the front page story the other day about China copying the MSN Search page. Of course, since this is the hypocritical Digg communty, the comments were fille with Microsoft shoout shut up. Everything has alreay been done before, so there is no such thing as copying.

    Can't have it both ways, assholes. For example, you can't be proud of being geeks and then expect to get laid ever in yor lives. And you can't say it is no big deal when someone steals from MSN and then bitch like little pussies about this.
    • Slipdisc, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10Agreed.
      I find it absolutely hilarious that users pretend to get so ticked off about it.
    • NinjAlt, on 10/12/2007, -10/+12Because digg users are ***** sheep. BAAAAAAAA. BAAAAAAAAAA.
    • noseeme, on 10/12/2007, -1/+18Yes, digg users are hypocrites.
      They (or should I say we?) complain about stringent copyright enforcement from the music and movie industry, DRM in music and movies, etc, but when they see a Chinese site breach Digg's copyright, they bitch and cry foul for the first time in their lives.
    • eplawless, on 10/12/2007, -13/+2I think you're wrong. I am proud of being a geek, and I got laid last night, and again this morning.
    • gavroche, on 10/12/2007, -10/+3Why would you be proud to be a geek?
    • silenceHR, on 10/12/2007, -5/+13"I think you're wrong. I am proud of being a geek, and I got laid last night, and again this morning."

      masturbation doesn't count.
    • lakawak, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2Yup. After all, isn't Digg's layout just "information"? And if there is one thing I have laerend from Digg (I've actually learned nothing from Digg...nothing useful anyway) it is that "INFORMATION WANTS TO BE FREEEEEEE!"

      Therefore, Digg's layout should be FREEEEEEEE! And hence, bitching about it is not allowed.

      Also, no one can say they "stole" it from Digg, since the standard ***** argument against the RIAA is that piracy is not stealing since it doesn't deprive the record companies of anything.

      Hey, I've got another good one. Why shouldn't the Chinese site use this layout without compensating? They are not willing to pay for it becuase it is not good enough to pay for. Hence, they should be able to take it for free. (Just like how hte music sucks so bad today that people HAVE to download it for free. It is not good enough to buy, just ake for free.)
  • JC4P, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7there are a kajillion digg clones, nothing new.
  • mkjones, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Wow. Its like looking into the future at Digg v4 :)
  • shreky, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2It seems they will get more traffic for being a rip and shown on digg. The front page stories have 5 and 8 diggs.
    I guess bad publicity is good for them since nothing else drives traffic to their site.
  • meeee, on 10/12/2007, -3/+5The Chinese authorities will probably take down this site faster than Digg's lawyers can type "Cease and " ...
  • noseeme, on 10/12/2007, -5/+5I say let them have their fun. Leave 'em alone.
    • loureiro97, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3yes , it's not like we need to worry about their (~10 diggs on frontpage) digg clone.
      Let their 20 people user base alone!
    • lakawak, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Why would YOU need to worry either way? You are not digg.
    • loureiro97, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2i'm sorry , but i'm a faithful member of digg and therefore belong to the community and every digger worth his diggs knows that it's all about the community.
  • veritech, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3I wanna see them copy stack and swarm, then, and only then, will they will have my respect.

    As i far as i see it the web is all about sharing, but copying IP and calling it your own is wrong.
  • JernejL, on 10/12/2007, -13/+4china can only copy, they have no creativity.
    • gavroche, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5lol! Are you serious?
    • rnmrnmrnm, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3where did you learn that from?
    • MrViklund, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1Agree. Copy copy copy, that's all they can do.
    • loureiro97, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@rnmrnmrnm
      maybe your not the best person to discuss creativity...
  • kasted, on 10/12/2007, -20/+3digg the story i submitted to those bastards
    http://www.cndigg.com/comments.jsp?newsId=1221
    • jellygraph, on 10/12/2007, -2/+14You are a embarrassment to the rest of us. I can't believe you are proud of what you wrote.
    • kasted, on 10/12/2007, -10/+2then why is everyone digging it?
    • gavroche, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10jellypgrah is right, you are ***** immature
    • kbeeveer46, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1I can't understand why they would be digging it. 38 of them thought it to be good enough to digg? Or are people making fake accounts and voting for it?
    • tuna1, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5@kasted

      You're such a ***** child.
  • tryferos, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3Their email address is cndigg@gmail.com, lets fill it up :P
  • chess007, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Wow wonder if digg lawyers will go after them as hard as they went after digggames.com... As they have a LEGITIMATE claim against these guys.

    This could be karma one brings on onesself by ATTACKING ones supporters...
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1i sent them a mail before i submitted it here, just making sure it's not theirs
  • AaronMT, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1Hope Kevin and the crew are aware of this
    • ChileanGoD, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5It made the front page.... But sshhhhhhhtttt... lets keep it a secret a little longuer.
  • sk1tch, on 10/12/2007, -7/+11. How are people angry at some Digg strawman over this? Yes, digg users hate copyright abuse in the form that the RIAA/MPAA practice: using their purchased legislature to maintain their outdated business model. Digg protecting their copyright in this case is just common sense, come on people.

    2. Digg no doubt has plans to go international already. They'd be crazy not to. Partnering with copy pasting lame ass programmers is not an option for a company valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

    3. We should do something to get back at these people for being so lame. ~10 votes hits the front page... I'm pretty sure we could keep goatse.cx et al on the front page of digg.cn forever. Anyone speek cantonese and want to write up a description along the lines 'This is what we think of our eternal ruler Mao'?
  • dwizzle13, on 10/12/2007, -10/+2china sucks, and so does cndigg, lol.
  • blueigloo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+30Please, you may strongly hate them for cloning digg, but thats no reason to act like a slurring moron and submit things like "DIGG.COM OWNS U CHINKS" to their page.

    Come on now..
    • ChileanGoD, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9^^^ Yeah... You see... that's the kind of attitude right there that the whole world likes about you guys. That's why we love americans so much.
    • omglawl, on 10/12/2007, -6/+0i find it funny, you just need to take a chill pill...
    • tuna1, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2That would be that moron, kasted. His comment about what he submitted is above yours. I say we go digg it down.
    • tuna1, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2@ChileanGoD

      ***** you Chilean. This guy represents no one.
    • zybch, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Well one thing they have EXACTLY cloned is how frigging slow digg is!
      Must have taken a lot of time for them to copy this 'feature' so well.
    • ChileanGoD, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1^^^ (@tuna1 second comment) Yeah... You see... that's the kind of attitude right there that the whole world likes about you guys. That's why we love americans so much.
      =)
    • nicmakaveli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1haha, yeah, it's just some complacently ignorant people that don't understand that this is just about the copying, why you have to make these comments?

      chinese invented lot's of stuff, and marco polo came and stole it, Nikola tesla founded the light bulb but Edison stole it.

      It's about the theft and lack of creativity not about their nationality.
  • daize, on 10/12/2007, -0/+29Have you guys seen the latest submitted story?

    Title: DIGG.COM OWNS U CHINKS
    Submitted By: kasted kasted 发表于 15 分 之前，查看58次
    Description: ***** U ASSHOLES

    For shame...
  • jellygraph, on 10/12/2007, -2/+12Seriously... why do you all care so much and take it so personally if someone carbon copies Digg.com . You'd think they insulted your mother.

    Yeah, so what. Another group of people in China copy something original. Happens everywhere and all the time. Big deal. It's not like regular Digg users are suddenly going to migrate away from Digg.com over to Digg.cn

    Get real
  • grayapple, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Just shows you how mature people on Digg.com are, Just forget about it and leave it, Let Kevin's Lawyers worry about it.
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1The chinks comment was NOT good, but it's ok to have a little fun with them. I don't believe that they will cooperate with Digg's lawyers, so we should help.
  • Avili, on 10/12/2007, -4/+20for shame indeed!
    >"DIGG.COM OWNS U CHINKS"
    it's currently ranked the top story on digg.cn, some very stupid digg users have taken it upon themselves to harass the site. It's sad that people would resort to such immature acts over something as small as a clone site. I mean a few months back a story made it to the front page about digg clone sites, and theres even free php scripts to run a very similar site.

    Slashdot existed before Digg, Digg just put a nicer interface on it. And I guarantee that after some time, some site will come out with something better then Digg and we'll all abandon Digg for the new competitor. It works the same way with every company and every site, eventually a better site comes along and people move over to that. Not that the cn site is any better, but it's just stupid to resort to such immaturity.
    • Straudlater, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6"Slashdot existed before Digg, Digg just put a nicer interface on it."

      Slashdot : editor-controlled :: Digg : user-controlled
    • OBKenobi, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2I never felt compelled to join Slashdot. You seemto think we all migrated to Digg from there, we didn't.
  • fuxjoey, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1There is no way Kevin Rose and the Digg staffs are not aware of this. Don't they pay attention to any "digg" related domain names? That's why they tried to ban a music site with "digg" in their domain name right?
  • nigel40, on 10/12/2007, -12/+2The Chinese, like the Japanese, are incapable of inventing anything. Since the start of industrialization, they have take our ideas and made cheap (and some not-so-cheap) copies. The Japanese are capable of actually improving on some things (cars), but still struggle with competing with the ingenuity of American inventiveness. Does anyone know why the Chinese are like this? I mean, the Chines used to have a great civilization. Now all they are capable of doing is polluting the planet beyond livability. Very sad.
    • Bamborzled, on 10/12/2007, -1/+13Apparently, Digg users, like trolls are incapable of civil conversation. Since the start of Digg.cn, they have taken their time to spam the front page with anti-Digg.cn and even anti-Chinese sentiment. Does anyone know why Digg users are like this? I mean, Digg users used to be civil and not stoop this low. Now all they are capable of doing is polluting the internet beyond livability.

      Very sad, indeed.

      No, seriously. Stop. You're acting like children.

      "But... But he did it first!"
    • Outdoor83, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10Sorry, rest of the world... I promise that some Americans don"t think like that.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 111 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.