11 Comments
- ScornForSega, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5 But the sweet, sweet cookies.
...yum. - eradicator, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Pepperjam... sounds like when your grinder gets stuck.
- R2Bacca, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Just wondering... did you even read the story? It was actually talking about a speculated Performics dissolution...
- mfearby, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Just how is this yawn-inducing article worthy of the 40 diggs received so far? Like I care about Google dissolving some advertising company. Why should we all have to see this crap on the digg front page?
- parksobong, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Why not?
- mikewhite314, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3I nearly fainted when I read the title, until I read the article.
- Yorn, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4Agreed, they need to make a new section: SEO, so I can uncheck it like I did the Apple one. Digg needs to be about choice in news, this is not news, or certainly none of my concern. I don't blogspam so it's not important to me.
- MechaFenris, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I uncheck politics whenever I possibly can, since most of the morons on digg get their insight and domain knowledge from the back of Frankenberry cereal.
- codered82, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Sounds like the word 'sensationalist' came to mind for you too...
- charlesmt, on 02/10/2008, -0/+0The title is misleading =(
http://www.basketsdirect.info - BHopkins, on 10/12/2007, -4/+4Something should definitely happen...Google can't have their hand in every cookie jar.
What is Digg?