digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Pay Per Post Direct Changes The Paid Review Landscape

andybeard.eu — Pay Per Post had first mover advantage within the paid review arena, and initially concentrated on providing a framework for the purchase of mass market buzz marketing.Competing services such as ReviewMe and Sponsored Reviews were launched, and these concentrated on one-to-one requests for professional reviews.

Who dugg this?

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

12 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • tnash, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2Nice round up, I must revisit Payer per post, I lost interest in all the PPP style sites a few months back, after little or no returns at the time I just couldn't find the balance between being paid peanuts and pricing myself out of the market
  • AndyBeard, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@tnash (#6856632)
    Tim it is a hard balance to make, I don't think I have it perfect yet but I think PPP Direct will certainly help.
    You know I am a stats freak, and the idea of sending 400 visits to any site that doesn't convert into some kind of income is a huge red flag I had to knock on the head.
  • davidairey, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Hopefully exposure like this will lower the percentage cut that other services take.

    An excellent review as per usual.
  • AndyBeard, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@tinasilva (#6854692)
    Glad you enjoyed it. It is quite long but I tried to include as many facts as I could.

    I feel it is important to give as much information in a review as you are able, whether it is paid for or not, and I was certainly not paid for this one.
  • AndyBeard, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@davidairey (#6857791)
    I think competition is healthy and helps businesses to thrive.

    The drawbacks of the 2 competing services that I highlighted had been reported to those services for some time before I eventually highlighted them.
  • AndyBeard, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1@sinhob (#6925693)
    I haven't written any either for their marketplace system, but this solution just seems to be extremely well thought out and executed.
  • sinhob, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Great post, Andy and although I signed up a long time ago, I haven't actually written any PPP reviews yet - but you've certainly got me thinking!!
  • tinasilva, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Great review!
  • Tobsy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Well done Andy. Very informative and thorough review.
  • lisaroberson, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Totally awesome and thorough review, Andy!
  • Derrich, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0Great review Andy. I read it earlier today and included it on my observation post. Actually...I saw that you stopped by Derrich.com. Thanks.
  • i8yerpuppy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0I don't visit Andy's site near as often as I should, but every time I do it's always worth it. Great review.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.