What is Digg?Sponsored by Travelzoo
All-time Low Fares for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up. Nifty all-airline calendar identifies absolute cheapest dates to fly.
716 Comments
- quidpro, on 09/10/2008, -18/+2068Everyone quickly digg this!!!
- inactive, on 09/10/2008, -6/+1150Other warnings include - Digging so fast is an indicator of script usage & violates Digg's TOU
- brainnovate, on 09/10/2008, -21/+854I blind dugg it :) ...standing with my back to my laptop and blindfolded.
- mattgilberg, on 09/10/2008, -11/+741So now we all know that diggboss is one of them
- jontalisman, on 09/10/2008, -9/+689I dugg this, but I clicked my mouse very, very slowly just to be on the safe side. :-)
- kingjafee, on 09/10/2008, -4/+342A system that knows a Japanese attempt to overthrow digg when it sees one.
The invasion ends here. - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -18/+349Good.
diggboss You have managed 55,000 diggs in a year and 4 months. a ridiculous amount by anyone standard. - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -2/+278but read it first..
- georgemason01, on 09/10/2008, -5/+252You've already made over 20 ***** comments in this thread alone. Die.
- netgeek06, on 09/10/2008, -36/+272Digg is for digging is there a limit for digging?
- galv0, on 09/10/2008, -7/+242MrBabyMan epic fail.
- skoles, on 09/10/2008, -1/+202250 diggabytes per month is allowed. But it's not advertised.
- inactive, on 09/10/2008, -6/+183If this helps end the clique who control the content on this site, with some members getting through 350 diggs a day it's great news for everyone.
Look at these blind diggers hitting thousands in 48 hours...
then they give out when exposed..
http://digg.com/tech_news/You_think_MrBabyMan_is_b ...
Or look how they can get content on the front page for no reason other than their power
http://digg.com/comedy/Weezer_prove_digg_is_Crazy - irfanmp, on 09/10/2008, -9/+186Diggboss, how come your screenshot of your story doesn't already say "dugg"? Is digg not even allowing you to digg your OWN submission?
- inactive, on 09/10/2008, -2/+167the rest of the site already do.
they will just be joining good company. - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -16/+165You are 6000 diggs a month user.
You are a system cheater.
like a glitcher in gears. - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -6/+144I actually tried to clicked the "OK" on the image.
- thespanielator, on 09/10/2008, -5/+138I seem to be the only person that thinks it's a good idea and that not declaring the goal posts makes it all the better.
Seriously, a lot of you guys don't seem to realise that carpet digging everything and digging for shouts etc is bad and not what the site should be about.
Read the articles and digg what you enjoy. Simple as that. - wontstoptalking, on 09/10/2008, -2/+131STOP YOU'LL BREAK DIGG!
- georgemason01, on 09/10/2008, -1/+122You've been a member here 2 months more than me, yet you have dugg over 67,000 items to my 1,405. I think you are only one of the few who will have a problem here, and somehow I think less blind digging will result in better content being promoted.
- netgeek06, on 09/10/2008, -15/+131My Mutual friends are going to hate me soon.
- Idiggapony, on 09/10/2008, -0/+115Poor MrBabyMan. What will become of him? He's probably already stumbling through the streets, his face strewn with tears, with a bottle of Zima in one hand, and in the other hand a handwritten sign saying "will write automating scripts for food."
- clickfire, on 09/10/2008, -8/+112No doubt, someone will counter with a script that diggs at random intervals and slower.
- takamichinaku, on 09/10/2008, -114/+218I am not able to Digg after 10 hours. What kind of system is this.
- takamichinaku, on 09/10/2008, -143/+244"Whoa there cowboy! Itchy trigger finger? Digging so fast is lame. How about REDITTING some stories instead?"
- irfanmp, on 09/10/2008, -15/+112If you think thats a cheap way to get a highly dugg comment thumb this comment UP, otherwise thumb it UP.
(By the way, I thumbed up your comment) - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -7/+103***** it, i dugg it without reading
- takamichinaku, on 09/10/2008, -7/+96Just a warning ?
Thats the effort of Digg towards the violators - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -4/+92Yep, it wont even allow the default 1 digg when you submit a new story.
- madeingermany, on 09/10/2008, -1/+85I didn't even get a warning.... I just dugg all stories on the front page, without getting any popup.
Now I have to undig all this crap ;) - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -1/+85Can you digg too deep?
- Chairboy, on 09/10/2008, -4/+85I really wish MrBabyMan would have submitted this, that would have been.... truly epic. Not lame 4chan epic, but something a little closer to the actual meaning of the word.
- benologist, on 09/10/2008, -0/+80If this slows down the whole mutual friends swapping diggs thing then good.
- AnotherDiggGuy, on 09/10/2008, -0/+77I dunno, over 6,000 other people managed to Digg it.
You dugg almost 7,000 stories in 2 1/2 weeks. Don't act like you don't understand why you can't digg *****. - MudMan69, on 09/10/2008, -2/+77Maybe get a life?
- Diffy, on 09/10/2008, -0/+75Based on all the ***** comments you have in this section I wish they would implement this for commenting as well. STFU takamichinaku!
- inactive, on 09/10/2008, -2/+75Heard of blind digging friends sub so they blind digg yours.
Title's not so catchy but the twist in the end is great. - kingjafee, on 09/10/2008, -8/+79I have been telling people for years we are already trapped in the Matrix so shut up and absorb our dead as nutrients.
Think steak.
Juicy steak. - Plasmatica, on 09/10/2008, -3/+70I blind dugg it :) ...cos I'm legally blind.
- inactive, on 09/10/2008, -5/+71I wonder what MrBabyMan will think of this
- lekahe, on 09/10/2008, -24/+90I am unable to Digg this and I have been asleep for the past 8 hours!!!!!
How long do they think reading a story takes???? - rdizzle, on 09/10/2008, -37/+102will all the Palin haters please stand up, please stand up, please stand up... this feature is courtesy of you.
- Gregd, on 09/10/2008, -7/+71I'M IN UR DIGGS SLOWIN U DOWN!
- badwithcomputer, on 09/10/2008, -39/+103i think this could be a potentially reasonable response to complaints in the digg community, but there should be more transparency in how the new system works. maybe a digg blog entry explaining how many diggs in a 24 hour period will set off the alarm, or just have pop-up warnings when you're within 10 diggs of overdoing it. also, the time it prevents you from digging should be made clear.
- DrDigg, on 09/10/2008, -6/+66shame on you for abusing the website. I see this as digg trying to take back the site from those who blindly digg to reciprocate. It keeps bad stories from blindly getting to the frontpage.
- sexybobo, on 09/10/2008, -0/+60When have they ever been open about their algorithm? If you tell people doing mass digging they can only digg 456 stories a day they will digg 456 stories. Same reason they don't explain the digg algorithm doing so will only allow the people trying to exploit it be able to exploit it.
I think digg will be able to get it set so people who are every day diggers will not even notice it and the spammers will not be able to blind digg every thing. - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -2/+62They try, but you cannot kill that which has no life.
- robert001, on 09/10/2008, -1/+57From your digg activity, you digg about 10 stories a minute. How are you genuinely looking at all of the submissions? If you aren't, then you are gaming the system.
Thanks - inactive, on 09/10/2008, -3/+59Ranking? When did Digg turn into a big contest to see who gets the most stories to the front page? Who cares?
- directedition, on 09/10/2008, -3/+57Digg is for reading stories and digging the ones you like. It's the backbone of the concept. Blind digging subverts this concept. This is an effective means of handling that corruption of Digg's fundamental idea.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 750 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is