What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
208 Comments
- bram, on 04/09/2009, -7/+460.013% suck
- edcrosay, on 04/09/2009, -3/+271I searched "bacon" and ended up with 3683 results. 27 in the last 24 hours.
The filter by date and/or # of diggs feature is pretty sweet.
There have been 34 bacon articles to hit 1000+ diggs overall. Four in the last month alone. - vrikis, on 04/09/2009, -1/+183i've always used the search to go back and check things and it always took forever and seeing the results on this new search my jaw dropped. i love the design AND the results are spot on. well done digg!
- AlyxVance, on 04/09/2009, -3/+158Search is what I always hated about digg. Now I'm happy.
- rdolishny, on 04/09/2009, -0/+100I always hated when I came across an article on digg but didn't follow it through, refresh a page, that article is gone .. but when I typed EXACTLY the key words in the description the article NEVER came up. I just did three test and it works perfectly. Thanks DIGG.
- BrokedownPalace, on 04/09/2009, -0/+77You can leave your Trig behind.
cause your friends don't derive and if they don't derive
well, they're no friends of mine.. - inactive, on 04/09/2009, -2/+54You can Math if you want to.
- insidein, on 04/09/2009, -0/+50About time! Thanks!
- t2t2, on 04/09/2009, -2/+51That's the part which only applies if you can't make a correct search query
(You can _always_ blame a small percentage on the user) - Gr00ver, on 04/09/2009, -2/+5047.3% of all statistics are made up.
- ekula, on 04/09/2009, -2/+45I'd say it's closer to 99.99% less suck, but they're not likely to admit the former search sucked THAT bad are they!?
- ezalis, on 04/09/2009, -0/+43Thank you. Now I don't have to go to google anymore and type "digg + ..."
- Chalks777, on 04/09/2009, -0/+40I say, we can prove what we want to
A function they will never find
And we can act like we come from Gottfried Leibniz
Leave Newton far behind
And we can derive - CrazySpaniard, on 04/09/2009, -1/+41never use tinypic
- POLARBEARjezuz, on 04/09/2009, -4/+39If this is the change Obama was talking about, I'm damn pleased!
- defaultdigger, on 04/09/2009, -0/+29New features week is here!!!!
- sparkmonkeyz, on 04/09/2009, -0/+2437.6% of everyone on digg will post this comment a total of 2.3 times throughout a year.
- mdvaldosta, on 04/09/2009, -0/+23The filters rock, might prompt me to do more than site:digg.com google searches now.
- inactive, on 04/10/2009, -2/+23We can math if we want to
We can leave your remainders behind
'Cause your friends don't divide and if they don't divide
Well then, even numbers work fine - ThatGeek, on 04/09/2009, -0/+20omfg, we have gone over this so many times
its in both your personal settings and on the diggbar itself. to the left of the X there is a down arrow. it says never show diggbar again - ThinkBox, on 04/09/2009, -0/+20I can search my own history. Finally... This feature used to be on digg. The day they took it out I was dumbfounded. It was a serious functionality blow. I'm glad its back.
- inactive, on 04/09/2009, -1/+20cool story bro
- danwallace, on 04/09/2009, -0/+18Even more evidence that bacon is the greatest thing to happen to human beings since prehensile thumbs.
- netneutrality, on 04/09/2009, -0/+18Most dugg stories ever: http://digg.com/search?s=http&sort=digg
- inactive, on 04/09/2009, -0/+17That's true 87.7% of the time, sometimes.
- KungFooJesus, on 04/09/2009, -0/+1660% of the time it works everytime.
- TheGreatBelow, on 04/09/2009, -1/+17...so you're sayin there's a chance?
- sparkmonkeyz, on 04/09/2009, -0/+15Very nice looking. I used to just search google with site:digg.com but it seems those days are over. w00t! digg has been putting out some very good stuff lately.
- brainintraining, on 04/09/2009, -2/+17tinypic FAIL
- joestump, on 04/09/2009, -0/+15This is running on the old search cluster for now. No idea when it'll be ported over.
- dburka, on 04/09/2009, -0/+14Joe's got the current solution... but you're right... the search would be way better if it searched for people too. It's a solid idea, but we wanted to at least get this big fix out before we tried to get too fancy.
- Nerfdude, on 04/09/2009, -0/+14sorry about that guys, here it is on imageshack.
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4028/66470988.png - broknman, on 04/09/2009, -4/+17I love it!
Now just fix profile history/search. - baldboy7, on 04/09/2009, -0/+13In other news, half of all people are above average.
- inactive, on 04/09/2009, -2/+14Digg Search: Now With 99.987% Less Suck...
BUT WILL I STILL GET A HAPPY ENDING? - inactive, on 04/09/2009, -0/+12Search isn't bad, but I would like an option to search for usernames in the future. It's not a big deal, but I think it's important.
- MattNF, on 04/09/2009, -1/+13Forgot the /s?
- Me1000, on 04/09/2009, -0/+10You're looking up porn at work? (your black bars over everything)
;) - LenzM, on 04/10/2009, -0/+10You can _always_ blame a large* percentage on the user
*fixed - Pulsedriv3r, on 04/09/2009, -0/+10Looks like the bury brigade found your comment as well.
- ayeroxor, on 04/10/2009, -2/+11D...I...G...G...M...A...T...H!
- dburka, on 04/09/2009, -1/+10But I made this one up, so it's got to be true. Right?
- Archaic1, on 04/10/2009, -0/+8Are you going to submit a screenshot of it?
- joestump, on 04/09/2009, -0/+8You can in the Add Friends. Allows search by username, first/last name and location I think.
- frieddonuts, on 04/09/2009, -0/+8or site:digg.com
- dburka, on 04/09/2009, -0/+8You _could_ set up a search that only looked for new stories with "-Obama -Democrats -hufffingtonpost" etc. and it'd go part of the way... then grab the RSS feed. Just sayin'
- HCviolence, on 04/09/2009, -0/+8WOW=34516
Females=25903
Seems right. - netneutrality, on 04/09/2009, -0/+8Editing the search text results in it forgetting the "Best Match / Most Dugg / Newest First" setting... that's a little annoying.
- landrypants, on 04/10/2009, -0/+7no
- anaclagon, on 04/09/2009, -0/+7When your performing a Cleavland Steamer accuracy is not super critical. As long as it hits the torso you're doing fine.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 214 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 