What is Digg?Sponsored by HowLifeWorks
How Private Online Shopping Clubs Work view!
howlifeworks.com - How to become a member and get discounts of up to 80% on must-have luxury goods
83 Comments
- roberekson, on 06/30/2009, -4/+118Awesome. The next story down on the front page is a dupe of this one.
- JesusHimself, on 06/30/2009, -1/+60Wow, how ironic, the dupe detector didnt detect the story submitted before this, from digg.
- KibblesnBitts, on 06/30/2009, -3/+49...anyone notice the submission listed right underneath this one?
- NewsFeed, on 06/30/2009, -1/+42About time... I was getting sick of coming up with good titles and descriptions, only to find it already submitted on the next page. Or even worse, having nothing look similar and then submitting to find a _2 on my digg url :(
- RichardC, on 06/30/2009, -0/+37This is a duplicate !!!!
- juice33, on 06/30/2009, -0/+24Finally!
- orangefly, on 06/30/2009, -0/+21i don't think it's working....
- bluenile, on 06/30/2009, -0/+20The new design is kinda irritating due to the URLs in description. The entire page (all pages where stories are listed) is now "click-able" which makes it a bit difficult to scroll up and down.
- evilpig, on 06/30/2009, -2/+17This is funny seeing how this article is a dupe of another from the front page LOL
- juankovo, on 06/30/2009, -0/+10Awesome. The comment a few comments above this one is a dupe of this one.
- drunkenoaf, on 06/30/2009, -0/+9And I noticed that this was pointed out 3 posts above, Meta-dupe!
- CapeKid, on 06/30/2009, -0/+9It will solve nothing. As long as there is a button to say that it is not a duplicate, nothing has changed.
It is like being able to say "I wasn't speeding" to a cop and he will always believe you. No one will get caught. - tbhurst, on 06/30/2009, -0/+8(applause)
- harrisbradley, on 06/30/2009, -1/+9Yeah, some people don't even read the article and make uninformed comments.
- microntech, on 06/30/2009, -0/+8DiggBar views are back.
- jurassiqpark, on 06/30/2009, -0/+8O RLY?
http://digg.com/d1vL3r - madctch, on 06/30/2009, -0/+8Anyone else Highlight text when they read? This new more button makes it difficult to do that to descriptions of the stories.
- nepidae, on 06/30/2009, -1/+9dupe
- harrisbradley, on 06/30/2009, -0/+7tested and approved.
- nard3456, on 07/01/2009, -0/+7Oh the irony...
- BotaXero, on 06/30/2009, -1/+8You are now show to spell.
- inactive, on 06/30/2009, -0/+6Oh the irony that this is a duplicate on the front page.
- vizerei, on 07/01/2009, -0/+5tinypic sucks
- hookai, on 06/30/2009, -1/+6You accidentally the whole description.
- dOOBiEx213, on 06/30/2009, -1/+6That won't stop BabySpam... or me, for that matter: http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Goes_to_the_Source_ ...
- crossmr, on 07/01/2009, -0/+4"At this point you either have to abandon the submission or click the ‘My story has no duplicates’ button, which could potentially put your account in jeopardy if it is indeed a duplicate story. (Be warned that even before this system, users were warned about submitting duplicate content. Digg will ban accounts for submitting obvious duplicate content.)" You know who will get banned? Joe Nobody. Do you think MrBabyman or any of the other powerusers are going to get banned? Never.
At most they'll ban some minor poweruser who know one really knows like the last time. - inactive, on 07/01/2009, -0/+4Can we get comment dupe detection please?
- shinkou, on 07/01/2009, -0/+3I was caught by this just a few minutes ago and I have to say that it's a lot more convenient now. Good news to all diggers!
- teamgwho, on 06/30/2009, -0/+3ahhh... the irony of this thread is wonderful to be behold... considering the thread directly below it....
- StefManevski, on 06/30/2009, -0/+3Great! I really hated, after doing all the "paperwork", finding a duplicate.
- getter1, on 06/30/2009, -0/+3http://digg.com/comedy/Diggs_Dupe_Detection_Fail
- KibblesnBitts, on 06/30/2009, -0/+3And I just realized that after checking my comment! Woo woo!
- steelreserve211, on 07/01/2009, -0/+3Correction - All your source are belong to us.
- homercles337, on 06/30/2009, -0/+3"Digg’s CSS started to go a little crazy..."
Cascading Style Sheet? What does CSS have to do with dupe detection? I ***** hate asshats that use acronyms without defining them. - inactive, on 06/30/2009, -1/+4Congratulations for making it to the 20th Century!
- ssquared22, on 06/30/2009, -0/+2Is anyone watching stats on their own pages to see if they are accurate, though.
- deboerpa, on 06/30/2009, -0/+2now if they could just get people to proof read their submissions.
- dazparkour, on 06/30/2009, -0/+2I noticed when parts of it started going wrong - I wasn't monitoring for it.
- chriswastaken, on 10/27/2009, -1/+3Shown*
**the spelling /grammar nazi fades into darkness. - miggie, on 07/01/2009, -0/+2It doesn't work because two stories about the new dupe system are on the front page.
- fiver22, on 06/30/2009, -0/+2Will it beat people who insist on submiting dupes anyway? Please be especially violent with those who submit dupes of stories that made it to the front page.
- bobartig, on 07/01/2009, -0/+2Yep, I submitted it:
http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Duplicate_stories_direct ... - displacednomad, on 06/30/2009, -0/+2Well it's apparent now that the dupe detector isn't working exactly as planned.
You'll notice that this submission from brentcsutoras.com links to the digg blog post in the next submission down on the list.
The source is there. The dupe detector did not detect it. - drewprops, on 07/01/2009, -0/+2Absolutely brilliant, my hat is off to you Burento, well played Sir (and/or Madam)!!
- slowspin, on 07/01/2009, -0/+2dupe.
- NewsFeed, on 07/01/2009, -1/+3In Digg's defense. I saw the article early on and it did not link to the Digg blog post until later.
- CaughtThinking, on 07/01/2009, -0/+2rofl, dupe on front page.
- NiceGuyVan, on 07/01/2009, -0/+1The button that lets them submit it anyway defeats the point
- themastersb, on 07/01/2009, -0/+1This has already been here, it just used to show up after making a title and description. It wont stop the people who submit duplicates. In fact, this submission is a duplicate.
- khsheehan, on 07/01/2009, -0/+1I'm as happy about this as most diggers are, but I feel like this is similar to an iPhone feature update. Copy & Paste may be great, but it is nothing we should have to get excited about.
-
Show 51 - 85 of 85 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is