What is Digg?Sponsored by Sony Pictures
Watch a scene from 2012, in theaters November 13 view!
whowillsurvive2012.com - Get ready for the biggest event in history - the end of time. How will you survive? 2012- opening 11/13
136 Comments
- nesagwa, on 03/25/2009, -28/+273No story? Just a twitter thing?
Is this what we have sunk to?
***** this, burried. - xdvx, on 03/24/2009, -3/+199Somebody is not very happy about their secret data posted online
- duckbillgates, on 03/25/2009, -14/+190Really? A Twitter post on Digg?
Really? - t0x2c, on 03/25/2009, -0/+148So much for freedom.
(Someone below me is going to reply with a lengthy rant about how we haven't had freedom for many many years. By all means go ahead, I agree with you.) - 2Deluxe, on 03/25/2009, -18/+149I'm burrying this purely because if we let this continue, the digg homepage will be nothing but ***** tweets.
- gotcheaprice, on 03/25/2009, -2/+102we haven't had freedom for many many years
- blahda, on 03/25/2009, -0/+97more info here
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home_of_Wiki ... - MtheoryX, on 03/25/2009, -3/+96tl;dr
- sonofabiscuit, on 03/25/2009, -1/+53Official press release:
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home_of_Wiki ... - MrCrissypoo, on 03/25/2009, -13/+61Buried, we look for news. Not twitter updates.
- inactive, on 03/25/2009, -0/+48Wikileaks must piss so many corrupt government officials off. I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often.
- Khast, on 03/25/2009, -0/+33Shortly after 9pm on Monday the 24th of March 2009, seven police officers in Dresden and four in Jena searched the homes of Theodor Reppe, who holds the domain registration for "wikileaks.de", the German name for wikileaks.org. According police documentation, the reason for the search was "distribution of pornographic material" and "discovery of evidence". Police claim the raid was initiated due to Mr. Reppe's position as the Wikileaks.de domain owner.
Police did not want to give any further information to Mr. Reppe and no contact was made with Wikileaks before or after the search. It is therefore not totally clear why the search was made, however Wikileaks, in its role as a defender of press freedoms, has published censorship lists for Australia, Thailand, Denmark and other countries. Included on the lists are references to sites alleged to contain pornography, including child pornography. Wikileaks has not published any images from the sites.
Some details of the search raise questions:
* Wikileaks was not contacted before the search, despite Wikileaks having at least two jouralists which are recognized members of the German Press Association (Deutscher Presse Verband).
* The time of at least 11 police detectives was wasted conducting a futile raid on the private home of volunteer assistant to a media organization.
* Mr Reppe was not informed of his rights; police documentation clearly shows that box to be left unchecked.
* Contrary to what is stated in the police protocol, Mr. Reppe did not agree to "not having a witness" present.
Ultimately, Mr Reppe refused to sign the police documentation due these and other inaccuracies.
The raid appears to be related to a recent German social hysteria around child pornography and the controversial battle for a national censorship system by the German family minister Ursula von der Leyen. It comes just a few weeks after a member of parliament, SPD minister Joerg Tauss had his office and private house searched by police. German bloggers discussing the subject were similarly raided.
Mr Reppe is maintainer of one of the most popular German Tor-proxy servers (morphium.info) and is not involved in the Wikileaks project other than sponsoring the German domain registration and mirroring a collection of Wikileaks US Congressional Research Service reports.
From Wikileaks. - jameshighmore, on 03/25/2009, -5/+33Thanks, cap'n obvious.
- pseudononymist, on 03/25/2009, -2/+30he said lengthy, gotche. LENGTHY!
We haven't had freedom for many, many years. In fact, did we ever really have freedom? What is freedom anyway? I mean used to be free to own slaves, that's freedom isn't it? Now I'm lucky to be free enough to even own a gun, or to have the right to be wiretapped without a warrant (a freedom I often enjoy ruminating about). I also miss the freedom to kill someone, one I enjoyed back when stones were the Internet, and how do we call ourselves ***** sapiens without the right to smite homosexuals? This is one freedom without which I find it diffcult to live.
To ensure the length of this rant, however, as I am completely out of ideas, I quoth:
When the powers that be were allowed to proclaim, forty years ago, that the murder of John F. Kennedy was the work of a lone gunman - a conclusion virtually no one ever believed - the American people sent a signal to their leaders that they could basically get away with anything they wanted, and the people would not significantly - and certainly not effectively - object.
What followed, as we all know, has been a litany of murderous deception: the downed airliners ruled accidents, the massacre of children and mothers holding babies, and the cynical demolition of American landmarks that were blamed on mysterious but unidentified (or misidentified) terrorists, for whom new repressive laws were instantly (and suspiciously) enacted.
Now the World Trade Center has come and gone, the fragments of what was once the world's tallest buildings are now buried in secrecy, and still no legitimate investigation into how this incomprehensible tragedy happened has been undertaken, never mind concluded. The message could not be clearer: the people who have obstructed a probe into 9/11 are the ones who benefit from obstructing it, and quite likely the ones who dreamed up the whole thing in the first place.
This tragic fact has been more or less verified with the recent revelation that the Project for a New American Century, a gang of Republican (and Zionist) warmongers, wrote a paper in 2000 advising that America needed a "Pearl Harbor type event" in order to justify the creation of new laws to limit freedom, and thereby improve conditions for increased business banditry by the very rich. Yet this is a notion that the mass media, which are wholly owned by many of the same interests who benefited from the 9/11 attacks, will never admit, never mind write about.
When an event happens that has been recommended by someone as desirable to happen, the people who made the recommendation in the first place should become the prime suspects. But that has not happened in America, which brags it is a free country, but never seems to get the truth about the truly momentous events in its own history.
Why? Because we let them get away with it.
We have let President Bush II win the debate day with such senseless pronouncements as "the terrorists hate our freedom" and allowed him to murder 5,000 innocent people in Afghanistan without a shred of evidence that any of them were involved in the tragedies in New York and Washington. We have allowed America to be surreally twisted into a hateful place where suspects are now guilty until proven innocent, without applying the same criteria to the actual perpetrators of the violence who manipulate and distort the social and political agenda to their own profitable aims.
And it's too late to fix the situation. Let's face it. They got away with it. It's water over the damn, old news. There's no going back now. The die is cast. The dead are buried. The facts are firmly covered up. New crises now distract us.
There is one positive that has come out of all this death and deception: people are taking a harder look at American history. Some are realizing that what is happening today has been happening all along.
We've harped on and lamented plenty about the criminal destruction of the American Indians. So for those young adults new to serious criticism of America's bloody and imperalist history, let's start with the Philippines and the so-called Spanish American War in 1898-99. The Philippines drove the Spanish out on their own, but then the Americans decided those stragetically placed islands were too lucrative to pass up and proceeded to kill 1.5 million Filipinos, while all the time the American people were reading in their own newspapers that the U.S. was helping these poor islanders fight the Spanish and "rebels." The phrase "war on terror" had not yet been invented, but the meaning was the same, more than a century ago. The war on terror is a war on freedom.
World Wars One and Two were essentially started by the West as Germany got too strong economically. Regardless of what you may have read in the schools that try to shape your mind on orders from the power elite, it was Britain that fired the first shot in both those wars, and the purpose of those shots was to regain commercial markets that had been lost to the Germans.
Let's cut to the contemporary chase and jump to 1963. Kennedy had fired CIA chief Allen Dulles after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Dulles, of course, along with Nixon and Bush, were the prime players in a continuous effort to destabilize the American economy by creating wars to stimulate arms-production profits. They were the prime players in a group of seriously rich industrialists who had financed Adolf Hitler in order to make money off the creation of the war known as The Big One. Allen Dulles, you may remember, was later named to head the Warren Commission that determined the assassination was the work of a lone nut.
Lone nuts were also falsely blamed for the murders of Martin Luther King Jr. and Bobby Kennedy. These too were stories that were never widely believed, but allowed to stand by the disoriented and deluded American populace.
The justification for the Vietnam war, triggered by a totally fictional incident, was similarly preposterous, trying to stop the Communist domino effect, according to the American papers, while in reality Ho Chi Minh had been asking for American help against the Chinese since World War I. In 1947, Ho again wrote a letter to Truman, expressing admiration for the U.S. and asking for assistance against the Chinese and the French. Truman never answered him, a decision that was to cost millions of lives two decades later. But that didn't matter. The profits of Dow and Dupont were all that did matter.
In recent years, buoyed by all these triumphs of deception, the atrocities became more frequent and more profound. I love these clowns who say the American government would never kill its own citizens. American history is chock full of examples in which the U.S. government has eagerly obliterated its own, especially its own military personnel (think Gulf War vaccines and Agent Orange) but also its average citizens (think, most recently, AIDS and anthrax).
In the 1990s, with foreign wars in relatively short supply, the focus of the beast turned inward, with the first WTC attack, Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City events all fomented from within the bowels of the American intelligence apparatus.
The first WTC bombing included a plant among the duped Egyptian terrorists who urged his controllers not to let the attack go forward when there was a clear opportunity to stop it, but the FBI let it happen anyway. More convincing that way.
At that small cabin in Idaho, the man who approved of a sniper putting a bullet in the forehead of a young mother holding her baby was later given a medal and appointed to be assistant director of the FBI.
And why did Janet Reno give the order to burn babies at Waco merely over some theological disputation? Why did the feds say they didn't know why Flight 800 blow up when, so far, 757 people have come forward to say they saw missiles hit the plane? Why did they insist JFK Jr. was a bad pilot? These were all lies, and we knew it. But we let them get away with it.
Prior to 9/11, my favorite preposterous atrocity explanation involved the government's demolition of the Murrah building in Oklahoma. Esteemed General Benton K. Partin delivered an incontrovertible report that explosives attached to five major stanchions inside the building were responsible for bringing the building down, and killing 168, but his expert testimony was ignored and the blame was placed directly on where the power elite intended it to be placed, on American patriots. Of course, the anti-terror legislation had already been written then, too, and was quickly passed with little debate.
And now we come to the watershed event in American history, 9/11, which precipitated the virtual suspension of the U.S. Constitution, because a Republican think tank had written several years before the event happened that this would be a profitable idea.
More than a year after this latest tragedy, no rational explanation has been presented to the American people, only charges without evidence and stilted and implausible cover stories tossed around that were quickly shot full of holes. And more murders. Lots more murders.
The deceitful deed has been covered up in the same way that all those other dirty deeds have always been covered up, with more manipulated events to distract everyone's attention and new crises to drive the "old" stories from the newspapers.
The anthrax attacks, almost surely carried out by government provocateurs, were meant to convince us that the "terrorist" crisis was continuing, and hypervigilance was required. Then, when the business histories of Bush and his demonic vice president threatened to blow up in their faces, a war against the innocent people of Iraq was fomented, despite rationales that elicited nothing but laughter and scorn from around the world.
In all of these situations, we let them get away with it. As a people, we did not and do not have the power, the clout, the impact, to overturn what our "elected" representatives perpetrate upon us. We have been taught to be sheep, not to rock the boat, not to challenge authority, not to question the official version of events lest our paydays be interrupted. We relinquish freedom for bribes.
As we have abandoned justice for the people of this planet, these are our 30 pieces of silver.
And now there's nothing we can do except go to the prison camps they send us to and take the poisons they prescribe for us, because we were always afraid to jeopardize our paltry paychecks and say the things we really felt, and make those things stick. This is how the American people forfeited freedom for the entire world.
from http://www.rense.com/general33/howe.htm
AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS HOW WE LOST OUR FREEDOM - vector86, on 03/25/2009, -2/+27Wow Germany, you guys are raiding people homes because of what's being said on the internet? Hmmm, raiding people's homes because of what they've said...this sounds like something I read about in a history book. Something that happened nearly 60 years ago, now what was it..? /s
- londonroad, on 03/25/2009, -0/+23THIS IS AN ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH. ***** the ***** who try and censor free speech.
- doctordbx, on 03/25/2009, -8/+29More here? then a link to a Twitter post containing less text than the Digg posting?
***** load of *****. - kimbja98, on 03/25/2009, -2/+20“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
Adolph Hitler, 1943
Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it... - coheedcollapse, on 03/25/2009, -3/+20Where the ***** were you when there was an HDR photo of a cat on the front page?
Anyways, this is one exception. It's not some guy tweeting about how ***** his coffee was or how his lunch sucked, it's straight from the source and updating as quickly as possible on the subject of a guy's house getting raided in connection to posting censorship lists. That's important enough to look past the generic twitter hate you guys love to flaunt about everywhere. - sonofabiscuit, on 03/25/2009, -0/+17Leak wikis.
- acdcfanbill, on 03/25/2009, -0/+16We: the human race.
- GalOnDigg, on 03/25/2009, -2/+17Ridiculous.
- DigitAl56K, on 03/25/2009, -7/+21Jesus, some of you are whiny brats.
Why *not* link to a twitter post?
A) You get the news the moment it breaks (it seems to be the official wikileaks twitter account, after all)
B) If you're interested, you can click the account name and see everything that's happened afterward and continue to get realtime updates. - Zarokima, on 03/25/2009, -1/+15http://digg.com/tech_news/Owner_of_wikileaks_de_ra ...
- watermelonnz, on 03/25/2009, -2/+16I wish people like you wouldn't rant on and on about things. JUST GET TO THE POINT, honestly.
- SuperCujo, on 03/25/2009, -2/+14Followed quickly by "Don't tase me, bro"
- Zarokima, on 03/25/2009, -0/+12How the ***** is censorship cool?
- SilverBack101, on 03/25/2009, -1/+13Fight the power, bro. *raises fist*
- Mutiny32, on 03/25/2009, -0/+11If this is about the firewall lists, whoever picked this fight chose the wrong people to antagonize. And if it is indeed about the list, it will now spread like wildfire.
- digg1520, on 03/25/2009, -0/+11Unfortunately this quote is a fake. Only the first sentence is found in "Mein Kampf".
- opit, on 03/25/2009, -0/+10The place is basically set up so as to be technically impossible to shut down : and leaks information from government employees secretly. A U.S. Court tried to order it closed : and got little traction.
- slugpellet63, on 03/25/2009, -0/+10Agree, logged in just to bury.
- wollsmosh, on 03/25/2009, -0/+9Yes, wtf. Here's a proper link: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home_of_Wiki ...
- DaviDTC, on 03/25/2009, -0/+8But they did...
- inactive, on 03/25/2009, -0/+8They urinate secret documents
- SuperCujo, on 03/25/2009, -0/+8Sweden, where it is illegal to force a journalist to reveal their source.
- SilverBack101, on 03/25/2009, -0/+7*bzzzzzzzaaap!*
- JasonAdams13, on 03/25/2009, -4/+10That comment sucks more than Dane Cook, Billy Corgan, and Kanye West combined.
- nesagwa, on 03/25/2009, -0/+6New levels in laziness from the "new" media.
- 2Deluxe, on 03/25/2009, -2/+8Or just follow the poster on twitter?
- SoopaflySAM, on 03/25/2009, -14/+20***** Twitter!
- odigity, on 03/25/2009, -0/+5We need this more than ever:
http://freenetproject.org/ - inactive, on 03/25/2009, -3/+8and in the USA.. hint: the unpatriotic "patriot act" , and the arrest and deportation of Finnish national Henrik Holappa, that took place very recently. He was seeking political asylum in the USA (legally) from an oppressive Finnish government. They (ICE) have the time to spy on, arrest, and deport this young lad, who has done nothing wrong but speak out against the growing Islamic population in Finland.. but obviously they don't have the time to do this for Mexican illegals that have committed heinous crimes and are still at large in our country.
- Snoosy, on 03/25/2009, -0/+5And this is why Twitter is useless.
- ThantiK, on 03/25/2009, -0/+5I am guessing your username is the reason your getting dugg down, however I agree. The power of the internet is the ability to remain anonymous and speak your mind. It's easy to bounce off of proxy servers or even use TOR to ensure other privacy matters like administering the server.
- ianmacfarlane, on 03/25/2009, -0/+4You can donate to Wikileaks on their site - http://wikileaks.org/ (or, I guess, http://wikileaks.de/ :))
- onelikeseabass, on 03/25/2009, -1/+5If I see anything positive about Twitter in a headline it's an automatic Bury.
***** TWITTER! - sodappop, on 03/25/2009, -0/+4I agree with you.
- IvesMozart, on 03/25/2009, -1/+5Agree ***** retarded just 120 characters
- xdvx, on 03/25/2009, -4/+8This is his fault http://digg.com/music/NIN_JA_Trent_Reznor_Announce ...
-
Show 51 - 100 of 144 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is