digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

New Images Show Where Tomorrow's Stars Will Be Born

foxnews.com — New Images Show Where Tomorrow's Stars Will Be Born , Submillimeter light reveals vast, chaotic area of dust, gas at center of our own Milky Way galaxy.

Who dugg this? Made popular Jul 7, 2009

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

14 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • DeviantDragon, on 07/07/2009, -0/+14Thought it was another celebrity article.
  • thenoxx, on 07/07/2009, -0/+9An interesting science article on Fox News?

    What the ***** is going on...?
  • lacrimosa2008, on 07/07/2009, -0/+6Who else thought about Hollywood, Ca. first?
  • Jeepy, on 07/07/2009, -0/+4*Where million year old stars have died.

    /Relativity
  • thebeginning, on 07/07/2009, -1/+5I figured it would be hospitals, easy.


    How wrong I was.
  • undervalued, on 07/07/2009, -0/+3Wow! First Fox news article that hasn't made me angry.
  • amossology, on 07/07/2009, -0/+2Tomorrow's stars will be born in Yugoslavia, Barbados, Guatemala, Zimbabwe and Uzbekistan. Angelina Jolie will adopt all of them.
  • Jeepy, on 07/07/2009, -0/+2It's funny that your comment about mock knee-jerk liberal vitriol is actual right win knee-jerk vitriol.
  • mriojas, on 07/07/2009, -1/+2But this is on Fox News, it must just be uninformed, racist, Earth-polluting, GOP propaganda.

    </mock knee-jerk liberal vitriol>
  • seanrtilley, on 07/07/2009, -0/+1I can't help it, the last couple headlines on here seem kind of flubbed.
  • allimaxvsaugmen, on 07/07/2009, -0/+1like her style
  • Soniti, on 07/07/2009, -1/+2I thought this was an Onion article at first.
  • inactive, on 07/07/2009, -1/+1I thought Fox News / Republicans didn't believe in stars? Don't they keep saying that the bright spots of light in the sky are angels smiling or something?
  • syntaxgs, on 07/07/2009, -3/+2my friend tell me that star are OLDer then that and won,t e tomorrow but LONG TIME in the future becosue they take LONG time too form

    it a inacurate article

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.