What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
51 Comments
- wildfire, on 10/10/2007, -3/+44Low-resolution version: http://tinyurl.com/2ns7xa
- IShouldBeWorkin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+25What if it were made of spare ribs, would you eat it then?
- nielkie, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17Coming soon to moon.google.com ?
- madmac625, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10Oh my. There are terrorists on the moon! Quick, call the Boston police, they'll know what to do!
- 1iProd, on 10/10/2007, -1/+11If you digg it it will come.
- tnatharik, on 10/10/2007, -2/+11I cant believe i am digging a news that does not currently exist.
- derphilipp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Finally they finished rendering....
- Jrr6415sun, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7it will be Google Moon
- oneoverzero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Direct link to the pictures, I think it might be up for a few more seconds:
http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/METRIC_PREVIEW/index.html - ViperCTW, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6Its a simple question doctor would you eat the moon if it were made of ribs?
- wildfire, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6SNL skit where Will Ferrell is Harry Caray (Space - The Infinite Frontier)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzvO9aS1hVc (Cue to 2:18) - Saint3k, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6For all those who think the moon landings were faked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_Experiment - shadowrogue, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6looking at the moon, BRB
- MasterThief117, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7Arizona State University just mooned us.
- noots, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3they left those easter eggs in because they couldn't find a photoshop professional good enough to use the curve function. congrats.
- MagiTekSoldier, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3We're whalers on the moon!
- 0crabby0, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Truth is, Mars is better surveyed than the moon - hopefully that will change soon with LROC
- STKD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2You might not. I however most definitely do.
- mooninite, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5I, sir, applaud your efforts. The moon rules.
- angryredplanet, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Moogle
- rrobster, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Pics soon or it didn't........................
- kepsux, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1You'd be more likely to find Pete Conrad's car keys.
- jtorkbob, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I yearn for 1.2GB TIFF. Only Ingrid can save us now.
- directive0, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I want to see pictures of tranquility base.
- Battlecry, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Sorry, not scanning the photographs.. the film. I still can't really understand the page.
- Battlecry, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Since they're just re-scanning the old photgraphs; how big were the pictures to begin with? How much resolution does a normal, say 8x10 picture have? Do I really need a 1GB file to see it in all its glory?
In english, I mean. - donkz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+120 bucks on someone finding a thong on the moon
- STKD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The Moon shall rise again!
/Futurama - fejus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I hope my legs don't break
/obscure? - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1No deal, McCutcheon that moon money is mine!!
- celerityfm, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1From TFA: "the raw scan may be close to the actual resolution of the film." - so yes, unfortunately, you do need a 1gb to see it in all its glory.
- superyounan1, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2I always wondered why there arent hi-res photos of the moon to show the planted american flag, dispelling the conspiracy theories about the first moon landing
- lord138, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Just say yes and we'll move on...
- slapthemonkey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1gooood......
- splinecl, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1so because some people already knew this, he shouldn't mention it...or whats your point?
- mhockey14221, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Were you in a coma for the past 20 years, good sir?
- raz98, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Here are all of the Apollo 70 mm Hasselblad images available at Nasa, and some sets are in high resolution.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/ - Rustbelt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Cool!
- fejus, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1sarcasm ...... learn use the "Check Spelling" button
- Hyperion1144, on 10/13/2007, -2/+2Wow. Made popular only 57 minutes ago... and the site has already been Dugg to death. Damn we move fast! I feel so proud to be a member of community with the collective attention span of a crack-addicted chimp with ADHD. Anybody got a link to a mirror? One with some mondo-bandwidth?
Wait... never mind... I just got distracted by something else... - TheDHC, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0yea, its not as cool as your ps3 i bet!!!!
the world of science has left you behind years ago i see - Vo0Ds, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Hi Res shots of the moon are all fine and dandy, but after looking at them for a min or two.... its just gray rocks!?
- LeeMaple, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0I'm not saying the landings were faked, not at all, but... How hard would it be to put those there without people placing them on the moon.. Not really proof sorry..
- longbow486, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0thats been known for some time know
- pussnuts, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2Can we cut this [/sarcasum] ***** out already? What the hell does putting it in brackets and prepended with a slash mean anyways? It's retarded. Please stop.
- DrLingCN, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0Is that real?
I really want to get that pics!
Now just wait for the link to the High-Res! - EldenChang, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0And how the heck can you get a high resolution scan from a low resolution picture of some almost 40 year old film?
Sounds like big BS to me. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -4/+1Oh cool, because, you know, I've NEVER seen the moon before.
-
Show 51 - 53 of 53 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is