Sponsored by HowLifeWorks
No new computer this year? No problem... view!
howlifeworks.com - How to make your old PC as fast as the day you first got it
22 Comments
- thatoneguydunno, on 05/19/2009, -0/+21Not bad for a 25 MHz 486 with 2 MB RAM.
- SystemJinx, on 05/19/2009, -0/+8Absolutely breathtaking.
- inactive, on 05/20/2009, -1/+8No 'Deep Field'?
- feelingfunky, on 05/20/2009, -0/+6you can get the larger images from http://hubblesite.org/gallery/
in case you wanted to see them better. - ban1d0, on 05/20/2009, -0/+5My God, it's full of stars...
- ripple123, on 05/20/2009, -0/+5i cant wait for the first pictures from hubbles newly installed cameras. if the stuff weve been getting up to now was from ccds from 2002 (at the latest), this new ***** gonna be awesome. imho.
- DireWolf11, on 05/19/2009, -0/+4yes, really really cool
- paramex, on 05/20/2009, -0/+4thx mate!
- inactive, on 05/20/2009, -1/+4No Eta Carinae? No Eskimo Nebula? No Hubble Deep Field?
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/ ...
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap031207.html
http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/booklet/assets/HubbleDeepF ... - USCnick, on 05/19/2009, -0/+3Dugg for the picture of the Eagle Nebula.
- zosoIV, on 05/20/2009, -0/+3FTA:
"On July 4, 1054, a “new star” startled Chinese astronomers, who wrote that the star was so bright that it was visible in broad daylight for several weeks. Almost a thousand years later, we know that the appearance was caused by a star 10 times the mass of our sun that exploded as a supernova. What’s left of the dead star is still spewing out high-energy particles into the Crab Nebula. This Hubble image, composed from 24 exposures, reveals the nebula’s structure.
Holy *****. - mongo25, on 05/20/2009, -0/+2V838 Monocerotis... like an untouched clitoris.
- ripple123, on 05/20/2009, -0/+2i predict spamming would drastically go down if you could reach through the internet and punch people in the face.
- eanbowman, on 05/20/2009, -0/+2Great pictures.
Too bad you can get them all on APOD and these particular versions aren't desktop resolution.
Fail. - ripple123, on 05/20/2009, -0/+1i find your analysis of the definition of single words in the blurb to be completely relevant, have a point, and not be boring whatsoever. TELL ME MOOORREE
- zenobia72rn, on 05/20/2009, -0/+1Amazing pictures
- rilus, on 05/26/2009, -0/+1http://z-e-r-o.up.seesaa.net/image/Hubble_Ultra_De ...
- cmw72, on 05/20/2009, -0/+1The Goatse thumbnail is a little disturbing ...
- indieguitar, on 05/20/2009, -0/+1Does anyone else see the YA RLY owl on the "Mars Up Close" picture? http://orlyowl.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/siteb ...
- BowZzer, on 05/20/2009, -3/+3Wow the universe is sooo . . . boring.
- audiblesilence, on 05/20/2009, -3/+1buried for not having a slideshow viewer. How hard is that? Pictures are great though
- mikesyr, on 05/20/2009, -2/+0I'm struggling with their definition of "Finest", im guessing they meant "beautiful" or "stunning" otherwise their omission of the HDF is just odd.



What is Digg?