Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
240 Comments
- Wiser87, on 05/16/2009, -2/+222If you go to the original blog where this is being posted, you can see that the logo is being revealed one iteration at a time. The second one has already been posted and there will be a new post every 24 hours.
The blog is linked in the article, but if you want to go directly to it, it's at http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/ - chrisbarr, on 05/16/2009, -0/+141Here's a better graphic that shows the entire history of the logo.
http://people.mozilla.com/~faaborg/files/20090515- ... - disrupter, on 05/16/2009, -5/+138Needs more cowbell
- jlimon, on 05/16/2009, -5/+110How about not being a jackass?
An artist created this logo, he is not a coder or project maintainer for Firefox. - LeviTheSmith, on 05/16/2009, -8/+92I like it
http://people.mozilla.com/~faaborg/files/20090515- ... - Araxen, on 05/16/2009, -42/+103It's the same damn thing. Who gives a ***** about this and how in the hell did it make it to the frontpage.
- 80hd, on 05/16/2009, -17/+77meh, I liked the pointy flames more.
Whatever though, as long as it is getting more lightweight and the bugs continue to get ironed out. Tree-tabbing as a built in feature instead of a plugin would be nice too. - Shaggy6ster, on 05/16/2009, -4/+58I tell you this as a fellow atheist. You're just as crazy as the religious people I'm sure you hate.
A fanatical lunatic is a fanatical lunatic, regardless of what hes fanatical about. - INTERNETMASTER, on 05/16/2009, -4/+533.5 is a lot more than just a new logo
- ThatGeek, on 05/17/2009, -0/+46that should have been dugg instead of the article
- lsaz, on 05/16/2009, -8/+54"Service Temporarily Unavailable"
Fuuuuuuuuu- - Xoti, on 05/16/2009, -0/+45The flames makes it go faster.
- somestranger26, on 05/16/2009, -3/+46You've obviously not tried any of the Firefox 3.5 builds.
- inactive, on 05/16/2009, -1/+42This is obviously the logo of a browser that strikes fear into the hearts of it's unsafe, backward and mediocre enemies.
- wisam, on 05/16/2009, -7/+47I don't.
The tail has more freakish/dragonish flames.
In my opinion, the old logo looked friendlier. - EvilBunnys, on 05/16/2009, -8/+38Service Temporarily Unavailable
- TheNyquilKid, on 05/16/2009, -2/+30Thanks for the life story.
- HurricaneDC, on 05/16/2009, -4/+32It looks about the same.
- Nitrodist88, on 05/16/2009, -11/+36It looks like the fox has a fish tail. I don't like it.
- CrazySpaniard, on 05/16/2009, -1/+26no they shouldn't
- fragmer, on 05/16/2009, -2/+26Adding features to the core that already exist as high-quality actively developed plugins goes very much against making the browser lightweight. Why bloat the standard distribution for everyone with a niche feature?
- twiztidsinz, on 05/17/2009, -1/+24New logo with the "Draft Rendering" watermark removed: http://i552.photobucket.com/albums/jj344/Twiztidsi ...
- hootie233, on 05/16/2009, -7/+27service down, yet i know this will still get dugg, thats the problem with digg
- ucffool, on 05/17/2009, -1/+19That was phenomenal, great find. Thanks.
- roxgod666, on 05/16/2009, -2/+20You're doing it wrong. Please stop misusing a good meme, unless you want to turn it to *****.
- doshindude, on 05/16/2009, -4/+21it looks the same.
- dlllb, on 05/16/2009, -2/+18Uhh, you can undigg things.
- benologist, on 05/16/2009, -1/+17God forbid the original article get ***** submitted on digg for a change instead of herding everyone through stupid little blogs.
- EvilBunnys, on 05/16/2009, -0/+16Ahhhh, you scared me there!
- inactive, on 05/16/2009, -0/+15"You cannot bury a comment twice."
Crap! - SwampyUK, on 05/17/2009, -0/+14Because the person in change of UI design can do those how? Welcome to the world of software development outside of your bedroom, where different people have different roles on a project.
- Lorddias, on 05/16/2009, -4/+18Right here: http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/3484/firefoxtan.j ...
- restlessdesign, on 05/16/2009, -3/+16Too many flames.
- schnikies79, on 05/16/2009, -3/+15All memes ARE *****.
- CityandColourrr, on 05/16/2009, -6/+18How is that a problem..? Some people digg something even if it's down so that they can go back to it later and see it just by simply looking at the things they've dugg recently.
I don't see how it's a problem. - FastZ, on 05/17/2009, -0/+12This is true. I would have never even noticed it had changed if I didn't get this news brought to me here at Digg.
- jeremymccurdy, on 05/16/2009, -0/+11In between flames.
- inactive, on 05/16/2009, -0/+11It looks like a fox-mermaid-flareon crossbreed.
- CircleFusion, on 05/16/2009, -2/+13I'm agnostic and I agree with shaggy6ster.
It's just an illustration that he liked when he was a kid. I'm not a fan of religion being pushed all over the place, but that's not what this is. It's just an illustration http://twitpic.com/3yuit. - Zippo, on 05/17/2009, -2/+13I prefer the existing logo... it's much cleaner.
- chrisbarr, on 05/17/2009, -0/+10Do you really think its the same team working on this? I'm sure that the programmers all stop and have a meeting on how to draw.
- derektherock42, on 05/16/2009, -1/+11The icon is here: http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/
It's okay, but it's not front-page worthy - JaseFace, on 05/17/2009, -1/+11If you don't think it's important/don't care, why the hell did you just tell us your opinion?
- bratterscain, on 05/16/2009, -4/+14Wow, what a difference.
- jcronkhite, on 05/16/2009, -0/+10How innovative. It looks exactly the same as the existing logo. But maybe a bit more clarity.
- homer00, on 05/16/2009, -1/+10Not enough flames.
- zachimal, on 05/17/2009, -0/+9You're weird Wyodiver. Possibly slightly crazy.
- Atomic1fire, on 05/17/2009, -1/+10Many of diggs tech section viewers also use firefox
- themastersb, on 05/17/2009, -0/+8It's not furry. In fact it isn't even dangerously furry.
- blowedupt, on 05/16/2009, -0/+8That is one heck of a run-on sentence.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 246 discussions




What is Digg?