6 Comments
- paulmetzger, on 11/08/2007, -0/+5If the Bush administration and these telecommunications companies weren't breaking the law, why do they need congress to grant them amnesty for their lawbreaking? Sadly, what our government is doing behind our backs is probably WAY worse than the craziest tin-foil-hat theories. How long until someone holds them accountable?
- JackDanger, on 11/08/2007, -0/+4from TFA:
"To perform what they say they want to do, which is look at international traffic, none of this makes any sense. These installations only make sense if they're doing a huge, massive domestic dragnet on everybody in the United States." - 4midori, on 11/08/2007, -0/+4Isn't it conservatives who are fond of saying "break the law, go to jail"? And now?
- ChristPissed, on 11/08/2007, -0/+3Lets not rush a decision on granting amnesty, until we know exactly what we're granting amnesty for. This case just keeps morphing as its criminality expands exponentially.
- rsie, on 11/08/2007, -0/+3This is the most criminal government that has ever braced these shores. Anyone in Congress that will not start impeachment hearings should be impeached themselves. How much more are we going to take? I think it's reaching a powder keg.
- nblsavage, on 11/08/2007, -0/+2This is not a Democrat/Republican issue. Do you honestly think that this program will never be used by future administrations for something other than "spying on terrorists"? The government has shown that it is incapable of restraining itself.


What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved