What is Digg?47 Comments
- kingkool68, on 10/12/2007, -1/+23Web 1.0: Under Construction
Web 2.0: Beta - Nougat, on 10/12/2007, -0/+22Web 1.0: Banner ads at the top and bottom of the page
Web 2.0: Banner ads at the top, bottom, sides and middle of the page. - remiprev, on 10/12/2007, -4/+25No man, it's:
Web 1.0: Banner ads at the top and bottom of the page
Web 2.0: Adblock - Tricky, on 10/12/2007, -2/+23Better description please.
- tHePeOPle, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12how very web 1.0 of you.
- logiik, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10web 1.0: annoying music blasting in the background of horribly designed pages.
web 2.0: wait, isn't that MySpace? - MatttK, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11The description looks a little daunting but it is actually a pretty good indication of what the article is about.. in fact, it is most of the article's content. ;)
- wingnut21, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11Web 1.0: "Ooooh! You're a web designer!"
Web 2.0: "Oh... you're a web designer..." - sundancekid503, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11Web 1.0: What are you Web 2.0: talking about? The description Web 1.0: is entirely clear and Web 2.0: formatted well for this Web 1.0: layout.
- thefirelane, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9Web 1.0: Everyone hopes to get rich through an IPO
Web 2.0: Everyone hopes to get rich through a Google buyout - L0t3k, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8
I particularly liked what "Matt" commented:
Web 1.0: “Under Construction”
Web 2.0: “Beta”
I got a healthy laugh out of that. - ogre2112, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8It was barely an article. I don't digg common sense. (That sounds funny)
- DNABeast, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Web 1.0: Dancing Hampsters
Web 2.0: Dancing on Treadmills - khag7, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7Theres some good stuff in there!
Web 1.0: Bookmark this page!
Web 2.0: Digg it! - MrKite, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Web 3.0: let's go back to the Web 1.0 paradigm.
- gameguy43, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4web 3.0: here's my nanochip id number, satellite-surveille me.
- gbacci, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3i liked this one:
web 1.0: Completely Flash sites suck.
web 2.0: Completely Flash sites still suck. - ArianeB, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Web 1.0: Web apps in Java are the future
Web 2.0: Web apps in AJAX are the future
Web 1.0: Embed MIDI files
Web 2.0: Embed YouTube videos
Web 1.0: Netscape vs Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Firefox vs Internet Explorer
PreWeb: Here's my number, call me
Web 1.0: Here's my e-mail address, write me
Web 2.0: Here's my MySpace name, PM me - Broadway, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Besides being a stupid description, he's not even using the best examples. The really good ones are in the comments, which is pretty rare.
My favorite:
Web 1.0: Developers whinging about Netscape users who won’t upgrade to Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Developers whinging about Internet Explorer users who won’t upgrade to Firefox - SuburbanDave, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Web 1.0: experiment, take risks, spinoff.
Web 2.0: see something popular and acquire.
Web 1.0: RealPlayer is abit of a hog, but not too annoying
Web 2.0: RealPlayer is downright Malware.
Web 1.0: Chat rooms
Web 2.0: MMORPGs
Web 1.0: Collections of Matching background and button sets
Web 2.0: Collections of Skins - ojk007, on 10/12/2007, -6/+9who wants to bury me?
- apollak, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Modern satire and insight on the state of the Web and the Web world at large. Zeldman offers up his views of the past and present web in the voice of the buzzerati, and then asks for his readers to take a crack at it.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Webb 3.0:
http://www.mil.gov.int.edu.org/
No, just kidding.. - gameguy43, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2web 1.0: lets see how many languages i can cram into one page!
web 2.0: let's see how many includes i can have! - Nougat, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Tangent: When my three year old son saw the OKGO video you've referenced, he announced: "I have a new word: treadmills."
And yes, when he spoke, I heard him use a colon. - stoppedcode12, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3Web 1.0: Animated Gif (super annoying, playing in an endless loop)
web 2.0: Animated flash (same thing, except there is audio)
That's the right one. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2web 1.0: 100kbps fast
web 2.0: 100mbps slow
web 1.0: porn.com
web 2.0: myspace.com - jo42, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1So, in other words, nothing has really changed, we're just calling the same things different names.
- davidlow, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Web 1.0: Making web pages in a word processor.
Web 2.0: Preparing documents in a web browser. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1That's awesome... why are people leaving there comments here? Can't follow the rules attention ho's?
- DJosephDesign, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Web 1.0: Don't talk to strangers.
Web 2.0: "I'm meeting gogoXguy24 tonight." - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2LoL good one! dugg
- j0c1f3r, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1stupid waste of a click......no digg
- DJosephDesign, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Web 1.0: Two spaces between sentences.
Web 2.0: No punctuation.
Web 1.0: Misspellings because of new "computer thing."
Web 2.0: Misspellings because it's cool and the .com you wanted is taken. - SushiCW, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3Good article, lousy description. Dugg anyway.
- threetoedkoala, on 12/14/2007, -0/+0Web 1.0: Users utilize crawler based search engines
Web 2.0: Users become crawlers and sites replace search engines
or an even better definition by comparison.....
Web 1.0: Constantly examining Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Stop being so confused about Web 2.0 - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1This a terrible explanation of web 2.0
Here is what my company has defined as web 2.0:
1: User Generated Content
2: User control over presentation of content
3: Pervasive feedback (comment/rating) of content - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2And then
Web 3.0: Please enter your credit card. - cypher35, on 10/12/2007, -5/+4no *****... that description doesn't make a whole lot of sense
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1Sorry, folks, but the only people who can't see a difference between then and now are the ones who were creating crap pages on Geocities and today create crap profiles on MySpace. Technology has advanced as far ahead of 1996 as 1996 did over the days of the Atari console.
But of course, we have the generation for whom all time froze the day they got their shiny new AOL 9-million-hours-free disk. Yes, if you logged on to Yahoo the first day on your Windows 95 box and haven't gone anywhere else since because you're scared you might break something if you type in the big white box at the top of your web browser again, then of course all this talk of progress is silly nonsense to you.
I've taken to calling it Web 2.0 because people get lost when I type "today's modern Internet". - spiderfish, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2Just lost 30 seconds of my life... thanks.
- pwallroth, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1Web 1.0: Trojans invade city with a horse
Web 2.0 Hackers invade computers with cities
you thought i was gona say trojans didnt you. - jsleno, on 10/12/2007, -7/+3Web 1.0: iMacs
Web 2.0: iPods
Web 1.0: Windows XP
Web 2.0: (Just be patient! it's coming!!!)
Web 1.0: "What is Linux?"
Web 2.0: "Why do you geeks all use Linux?"
Web 1.0: "I did not have sex with that woman."
Web 2.0: "We do not torture."
Web 1.0: "Madonna is slut"
Web 2.0: "Lindsay Lohan is a Fire-Crotch"
Web 1.0: "The Tigers SUCK!!!"
Web 2.0: "Well, I STILL say the Tigers Suck!!! - Mindenigma, on 10/12/2007, -5/+0Its very realistic. Its been a long time that Zeldman have posted a good article like that.
My comparison:
Web 1.0: Animated Gif
Web 2.0: Animated JavaScript - bergur1, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1web 1.0: Dial Up
web 2.0: ADSL+ - opitica, on 10/12/2007, -10/+4***** web 2.0
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is