Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
46 Comments
- sfacets, on 10/12/2007, -8/+68-marked as inaccurate.
- sidd, on 10/12/2007, -5/+48also marking as inaccurate. Title suggests that del.icio.us have changed their home page.
- tafkase7en, on 10/12/2007, -8/+38Still ***** ugly.
- TenebrousX, on 10/12/2007, -3/+27it just makes the text smaller and replaces the logo with a star.
buried, lame - saikhan, on 10/12/2007, -6/+27Web 2.0 my ass.
- Xinex, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14Yeah, it seems like not that many people like it? What is wrong with it? Is it the minimalist approach and lack of colors? The great information architecture? Why does everybody hate it so much? I like it a lot; it gives my eyes a break from gradients for a few seconds.
- Supafly, on 10/12/2007, -4/+16I hate you for all eternity for posting that...
- bobbknight, on 10/12/2007, -5/+15Marked as lame for who gives a *****.
- AbsoluteMSTR, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6FONT IS TOO SMALL
and marked as inaccurate for misleading title - Powerdrift, on 10/12/2007, -8/+14I dunno... I kinda like the del.icio.us deisgn.
- wuori, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8Ugly works for me.
- jamsea, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5awww man! I just got that song out of my head a few days ago too!
Now I gotta listening to slayer to drown it out again... - Jarasmen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Is this some sort of Inaccurate Story Day? Half of the stories I opened from Digg today were some sensationist crap.
- wafflez, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3but digg is oh-so-sexier.
in contrast in my eyes, it's like comparing ebay to craigslist. - piyo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1original is better
- martin77, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1so much for the big revamp. Delicious seems to be frozen at the moment.
Links haven't been updated for over 24 hours.
and the new colours look horrible too. - alej744, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I like.
- Burn, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I modified mine slightly so that the sidebar is back on the left.
- dcharti, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Misleading article.
*****. - webonics, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Glad to see del.icio.us finally decide to consider an interface upgrade. Unfortunately, it seems that still miss the whole point that the predecessor interface is too boring and needs more visual appeal. What is del.icio.us' deal against color? I hate the monochromatic look of it but like that they FINALLY added a screenshot. Keep working towards version 3.0.
- yahoofrom, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1We are fish and the site is fishermen.
- tmiller51, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2I just wish they would get rid of the pink font background behind the "saved by xx people" fields, it's very hard to read on my CRT monitor. It is more readable on my LCD monitor at work.
- sagenumen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1FEWER colors.....good grief
oops....didn't mean to reply to the above comment... - rmkBow, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1i personally like this style better: http://userstyles.org/style/show/1219
but here are a few greasemonkey/userstyle tweaks for del.icio.us to choose from. http://userstyles.org/style/search/http%3A%2F%2Fdel.icio.us%2F - grow, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2I agree 100%. It's not so bad when not too many people have it saved, but the more it has it just gets horrible. However, considering that's my only annoyance, It's quite a great site.
- xhtmled, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This looks much worse than how it looks now!!
- alej744, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3yeah Pink sucks. sucks big penis *****
- dotari, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Marked as inaccurate.
- bizchris, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I don't like the changes at all - lots more scrolling down the page due to the wasted white space in my del.icio.us entries, and when I'm tagging something, I can no longer press the down arrow to complete an auto-recognized entry. Loss of functionality != about time...
- mattottam, on 09/29/2009, -0/+0marked as inaccurate - del.icio.us did not reorganize anything
- neuropsychguy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1Grammar Nazi here:
Not "less colors" but "fewer colors"
Site is still confusing (not really confusing just not terribly user-friendly). - BlogJones, on 10/12/2007, -6/+5This would be such an awesome story if it were only true!
- pylorca, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0web 2.0?
- Poppeseed, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2I use it too, and I find it looks a lot better than the original style. It takes a while getting used to having the sidebar on the right, but it just seems to flow better.
- crash013, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3http://www.duggmirror.com
- bennyboy371, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2Damn I'm tired of people submitting Stylish userstyles, it always crashes that site whenever I want to use it. Its just a small CSS hack. I wish there would be one to make del.icio.us look somewhat decent, I have always hated the interface.
Speaking of which, I'm using "Digg - Sexy Back" from there, if anyone wants Digg to look better, use that one. - regeya, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2Yeah, complete lack of gradients and logos with reflections...I love it! More sites should be this way.
- rockforever, on 10/12/2007, -9/+6thank you greasemonkey!
- aminom, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Still doesn't help the fact that the links on the Hotlist are usually the most boring, useless links you'll ever see.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -10/+5Still Web 1.5...
- oslointhesummer, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1lame.
however, using a button to install the greasemonkey script: very slick. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -9/+3"netscape? didnt that used to be a browser?"
- DoubtfulSalmon, on 10/12/2007, -8/+1Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Well, that stayed up for a long time, didn't it! - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -14/+6now if only they can make one for netscape.com.... if its even possible
- alej744, on 10/12/2007, -13/+1LMAO! LMAAAAOOOOO!!!
oh ma gawd
aaaaah
heh heh heh - datcrazydj, on 10/12/2007, -22/+6D to the E, to the L-I-C-I-O-U-S...


What is Digg?