33 Comments
- Meep3D, on 04/06/2009, -1/+44You have to give jQuery props for making difficult things incredibly easy!
- KnightMareInc, on 04/06/2009, -3/+23If I could have sex with jquery, I would.
- Ghoul, on 04/06/2009, -0/+10For #8, the jQuery Validation plugin is very powerful and pretty easy to use. Certainly beats rolling your own. http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation
- sClubDevin, on 04/06/2009, -2/+11Nothing beats AJAX.
- gbhall, on 04/06/2009, -0/+9jQuery is my favourite JavaScript Library!
- notrub225, on 04/06/2009, -1/+8jQuery does AJAX, but you can't compare the two.
- lil_isie, on 04/06/2009, -0/+6Dugg for that sweet progress bar!
- ghazali160364, on 04/06/2009, -0/+4Great work! nicely done. Thnx 4 sharing
- quade, on 04/09/2009, -0/+4I think there's a plugin for that.
- kevisazombie, on 04/06/2009, -0/+3I have been spoiled by jQuery. Going back to vanilla JavaScript is like making a fire with sticks and grass. You don't even have to think about cross browser issues with jQuery.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+2Yet.
- warMen, on 04/06/2009, -1/+3good article. I'll probably end up using some of this as a reference
- godsdead, on 04/06/2009, -1/+3Nice roundup of tutorials, these are tutorials that can actulary be used! :)
- StrikePower, on 05/06/2009, -0/+2Great article!
- pdt162004, on 04/06/2009, -0/+2Both work well, jQuery just has more user support and therefore forum knowledge!
- inkubux, on 04/07/2009, -0/+2The pir example saved my day. I hate flash and siFR (yeah i'm a linux user)
- digjam, on 04/06/2009, -0/+1Awesome...Thanks
- rampurhaat, on 09/28/2009, -0/+1AJAX sucks. JQuery is great though.
-- RPH: http://www.cwglive.com - DFactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+1bacon > all
- dungar, on 04/06/2009, -0/+1you will one day.
- exptech, on 04/16/2009, -0/+1Very nice Article. Thanks
PS
I found this interesting: http://codefile.blogspot.com/2009/04/php-one-of-bi ... - dungar, on 04/06/2009, -0/+1does anyone know how to integrate this to pull data from Twitter?
- inkswamp, on 04/23/2009, -0/+1If you know what you're doing, dealing with cross-browser issues isn't that hard. And writing your own code instead of relying on a canned library is far more rewarding and interesting, but whatever. To each his own.
- zugdar, on 05/04/2009, -0/+1Some cool articles in here, especially the progress bar
P.S. my digg was the 1337th - OasisR123, on 04/06/2009, -0/+1PSV Eindhoven maybe... =P
- Xanthir, on 04/10/2009, -0/+0Glad you liked it! (I'm the author of PIR.) I'm always happy to see people getting use out of my plugin. ^_^
- quade, on 04/09/2009, -1/+1I don't have to do nothing.
- se7en11, on 04/06/2009, -1/+1pie beats everything hmmm pie
- shanehonda, on 05/19/2009, -6/+3AJAX such a ***** buzzterm. (jQuery is a great great tool)
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -4/+1Ajax FTW!
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -5/+2jQuery vs Prototype.
- gritta, on 04/06/2009, -6/+1jQuery is good but I have to vouch for GWT: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit
- BxBoy, on 04/06/2009, -12/+2AJAX = Awesome!

What is Digg?