What is Digg?Sponsored by Threadless
This Game Sucks view!
threadless.com - Grab this epic gaming tee for only $12 during the Threadless Holiday Sale!
72 Comments
- the_snitch, on 10/12/2007, -1/+90I thought you were quoting a bible verse or something
- shibz, on 10/12/2007, -4/+78I was getting some bad lag when I click on a choice. Even if I was correct, it would just sit there and let the timer tick for like 10 seconds before saying that I was correct. I don't see how its possible to get any good score with it lagging like that.
- val8ntin, on 10/12/2007, -5/+68Wow! Yet another fanboy who can't spell Linux!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+45Yahoo logo was freaking hard. they all kinda look the same
- MrSidnet, on 10/12/2007, -1/+39Here's where I gave up *sigh*
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/5466/logovg6.jpg - rocktorrentz, on 10/12/2007, -2/+39I run linux and am using the beta version of flash 9 which works fine :D
- Engival, on 10/12/2007, -0/+21Um, it's not even using flash. It's all javascript.
- Confusinator, on 10/12/2007, -3/+18It seems to lag each time I select an answer.
- abusive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+13Flash may have been a better idea for this type of game. ;)
http://www.guessthelogo.com/script.js - arachnist, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11What did you say? http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/444/operahn3.jpg
Flash 9 works perfectly well here. - andr3, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11--nevermind, wrong page---
digg's login doesn't work weel with tabs.. it directs us to the last news we opened, which was the one where I clicked reply.... damn it. - seks03, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9That sucked!!! The concept is cool but the experience was horrible... not sure if it was due to the digg effect or bad scripting
- EasY_TargeT, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6thats 852 genius
- MattLat, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6It took like, 30 seconds for the thing to register a correct answer for me. It's still goin' for the last question. So far I think it's added around 3 minutes to my time
- himthatwas, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7I like how it only allows you to click on the wrong answers, that's a real nice touch.
- emorphien, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4wow, 30 seconds after I clicked it might register a response!
- darny, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Doesn't work, sorry. Answers take ~10s each to register.
- TPrime, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3The CNet logos varied with the slash between C and Net.
The IMDb logos, though, I could not get that one at all. - d722002, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5Digg kills yet another awesome idea... lol. It looked cool, ill try it after the digg effect passes.
- thepatryn, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I'm in Debian GNU/Linux with Flash 7 and it ran fine.
- nytsua, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2IMDB is internet movie database www.imdb.com great place to look up information on movies and tvs
I can't get the site to work. Just sits there loading in Firefox 2 and IE7, though I don't think I'd do very well. I'm not the most observant person. - nubnub, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2lags and it said every netflix or whatever its called was wrong and half the images don't even show up. Flash would work better
- po43292, on 10/12/2007, -0/+22 minutes 22 seconds....
the IMDB one and CNET ones all looked exactly the same - abusive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2It was working well before it hit front page...
I would just give it some time. It works well under low load. - lukychmz, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3it loads so slow....20 seconds pass between answering a question and the next one being asked
- tonyhartfield, on 10/12/2007, -2/+4works fine with linux beta of flash 9
- mikeazorin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1billymachine:
I'm insulted. The penny test was hard when I took it, I had to think for a long time. - sachmanb, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1phew, luckily i didn't do that well. i was worried i was a corporate whore
- EasY_TargeT, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Tristan Hacks, end of story
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2ugggg, site is running so crippling slow that after clicking it takes a good 30 seconds to register
- davidod87, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I like how the server lag delays my answers by like 10 seconds.
- GuyHitByTruck, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Worked for me within seconds. I never got the main site to say anything other than "Loading..."
- subxero37, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Wicked lag, and the game depends on very subtle differences that 90% of people wouldn't catch -- especially the freakin' shape of the golden border around "IMDB." Burn.
I didn't finish the game, it was lagging by a good 20 seconds, even on wrong answers. - donald347, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Got to number 2!
- DesireCampbell, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I cheated and looked at my google toolbar :P
- donsherio, on 10/12/2007, -6/+7am i missing something??/ cause this site doesn't seem to load... it just shows the logos flashing by .... no progress.... .v.v
- Crazyiodudo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Some of the logos were a little too close to call. The coloring of the lettering on Google had me confused. The only one I got right on the first try was youtube.
- Nanobe, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1IMDb and Yahoo! did me in. But I still ranked 99.89% on my first try. Not bad.
- alexrandall, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Look corners
- Desolite, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1top 10 first try... JC
- billymachine, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Don't be upset, you're in good company. Very few people would be able to recognize these things, or a penny. It's extremely hard to remember something based on mindless exposure. This is a great example of a psychological theory called depth of processing: Information that is irrelevant or incidental will not be remembered as well as information that is meaningful and that you are motivated to learn.
http://www.google.com/search?q=depth+of+processing - OmniMe, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2rank 68
- rnelsonee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Good lord, I only got one wrong (Myspace, which I've never used because I'm far too old). Clearly, I need a life. The eBay was pretty much a guess, and the Yahoo! one was hard, but it's the only one that 'looked right'. And Amazon has that fun 'hidden' gimmick (A-to-Z arrow).
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2They were all looking very similar, yeah. I kinda had to start thinking about how I would design a logo; on yahoo specifically I remember thinking that tehy'd probably want the word angled up. You know, to use subtle manipulation...a word that goes up at the end is happier than one that goes down or randomly goes up and down.
- mxfreak92, on 10/12/2007, -0/+199.87 2:05.... i was baffled by the google one and even more baffled when i instantly knew which one it was...imbd was a pure guess
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The game froze on me.
- MrDarkSim, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I must not pay attention to logos.It took me 6 tries on Google and it is set as my home page.
I clocked in under 3 minutes.Never did get one right on the first try. - blackrainbown, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Nice one, ranked 689th.
-
Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
