What is Digg?200 Comments
- JesusTeaseUs, on 11/21/2008, -2/+168Oh no...please tell me it is not exposed body parts. If our childrens are exposed to this, they will all start worshipping Satan! People will marry farm animals! The world will fall into darkness!
/don't know whether to fap or roll my eyes.... - theadvinci, on 11/21/2008, -0/+111You meant... don't get your hopes up? :]
- Ricky138, on 11/22/2008, -9/+96well heres what some of the unblured pics missed
http://www.cambridge2000.com/cambridge2000/images/ ... - wishninja, on 11/21/2008, -1/+87link to photo plz
- inactive, on 11/22/2008, -1/+71come on, internet. you-know- whats or it didn't happen.
come on! - thehoodie, on 11/22/2008, -4/+64http://www.hln.be/static/FOTO/pe/10/9/7/large_5395 ...
- ScottMcIntyre, on 11/21/2008, -6/+53Don't worry- in case you're wondering, the photo in the article is SFW. It's been pixelated.
- caltheos, on 11/22/2008, -0/+46They blew up the wrong portion of the photo!
- nighthawk419, on 11/22/2008, -9/+53http://www.hln.be/static/FOTO/pe/10/9/7/large_5395 ...
- thehoodie, on 11/22/2008, -1/+43Pics or it didn't happen
- sexybobo, on 11/22/2008, -0/+38shame they are your own man boobs.
- shagie, on 11/22/2008, -0/+37ENHANCE
- martoq, on 11/22/2008, -0/+36Screw that. Where's the unpixelated pics?
- Snowspot, on 11/22/2008, -2/+37OMG and at art school... they have nude people.. in PERSON!!! the nude body, a disturbing site indeed!
- augustojr, on 11/22/2008, -1/+36um, where are the pics?
- fnnkybutt, on 11/22/2008, -0/+33The situation is dire - I suggest both.
- hcarlens, on 11/22/2008, -0/+32I'm a student at Cambridge, and got this magazine a few days ago. I have to admit I was quite surprised when I opened that magazine, because I really didn't expect to see a topless student, but I really don't get what the big deal is. Here are some pics of page 3 I took just now:
http://img266.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image036s ...
http://img55.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image037rz ...
http://img55.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image038zn ... - blakck, on 11/22/2008, -0/+29Personally, I wanted to get something else up.
- SpeedSteamBoat, on 11/22/2008, -1/+25They blew up the wrong part of the image. :-/
- cl2yp71c, on 11/22/2008, -0/+24First person to post a link to the picture(uncensored), wins.
- hcarlens, on 11/22/2008, -1/+24I'm a student at Cambridge, and got this magazine a few days ago. I have to admit I was quite surprised when I opened that magazine, because I really didn't expect to see a topless student, but I really don't get what the big deal is. Here are some pics of page 3 I took just now:
http://img266.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image036s ...
http://img55.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image037rz ...
http://img55.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image038zn ... - atdigg, on 11/21/2008, -0/+23In other news the University Magazine has seen record sales.
BTW, I want to say this for the record "good for you, you are a cool girl" - BlackCow, on 11/22/2008, -1/+24Oh no exposed breasts, quick to the panic room!
- JasonAdams13, on 11/22/2008, -0/+22"It also has a website featuring a video of women sitting in a changing room"
WHERE IS THIS SITE - Walker2323, on 11/22/2008, -0/+21WTF? That was weak.
- Vorin, on 11/22/2008, -0/+19i'd tap that.
- thscientist1, on 11/22/2008, -0/+19Cmon... Its popular for 12 mins. FOR CHRISTSAKE THERES "TOPLESS" IN THE TITLE
Why havent you diggers got the uncensored spread yet. - feenxfire, on 11/22/2008, -2/+20***** or GTFO.
- whoreable, on 11/22/2008, -0/+17This is relevant to my interests.
- Zalyster, on 11/22/2008, -0/+17enhance enhance
- Doktag, on 11/22/2008, -1/+17F5 F5 F5
- Davers, on 11/22/2008, -1/+17Magazine scan or bury.
- inactive, on 11/22/2008, -0/+16You're stupid.
- SpeedSteamBoat, on 11/22/2008, -0/+15"What's the big deal? Everybody loves *****!" -Ricky
- Eagle193, on 11/22/2008, -0/+14I wish my college had a page three like that....
- moonlessrat, on 11/22/2008, -4/+18http://www.hln.be/static/FOTO/pe/10/9/7/large_5395 ...
- Fi9nutz, on 11/22/2008, -0/+13lol every week...by appointment
- dball48, on 11/22/2008, -1/+13Wow, that was really poorly written.
- sexybobo, on 11/22/2008, -0/+12he is refreshing the story waiting for some one to link to the image.
- tech42er, on 11/22/2008, -2/+14Yup, and a magazine produced by adults for adults is not the place for that! Go ***** yourself, you paternalist prick.
- history1me, on 11/22/2008, -0/+12If i'm not mistaken, those are three wet holes.
- augustojr, on 11/22/2008, -3/+14imageshack link, eh
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/3686/large53957 ... - PoopOnPaul, on 11/22/2008, -1/+10ZOMG don't let the people see the other people exposed! Especially adults! The human body is a perversion!
- ScientistBlah, on 11/22/2008, -0/+8You sound like a prick when you attempt to brag that you have a girlfriend. Nobody cares. (And now I'm anticipating the classic "You're only saying that because you've never touched a girl in your life" argument, which I won't even consider responding to.
- jcaino, on 11/22/2008, -1/+9Oh no! Boobies! Sheesh - everyone's seen em. A lot of people start life with them in their mouth. I don't think this is going to kill anyone or emotionally harm anyone in anyway. If a set of breasts is going to adversely affect someone, maybe it gives an old dude a heart attack or something, but otherwise they're probably destined for issues anyway.
- overt, on 11/22/2008, -2/+10Jews? How can you tell? Or is there a nude male spread that I'm unaware of.
- heartsblood, on 11/22/2008, -1/+9buried for a newspaper that censored art. If nudity is a problem you don't write about it.
- Calcularius, on 11/22/2008, -3/+11Anybody who has a problem with this a ***** prude and needs to go bury their head in wet cement.
- slingr, on 11/22/2008, -0/+8Just print the damn picture Ramathorn!
- thcobbs, on 11/22/2008, -1/+9@chr0nic21
On the actual page of the magazine...
Seriously, how many guys were actually looking at her face? -
Show 51 - 100 of 214 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
