digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About
See the original image at seattleweekly.com

Lingerie Football League Spring Scouting Report [PHOTOSET]

seattleweekly.com — *****

Who dugg this? Made popular Apr 29, 2009

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

115 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • usern4me, on 04/29/2009, -1/+139I think a lot of them will start as tight ends and become wide receivers
  • FearisFailure, on 04/29/2009, -0/+128Not enough lingerie.
  • joebus, on 04/29/2009, -5/+70What was up with all the douchebag captions underneath the photos?
  • PocchieTheMan, on 04/29/2009, -1/+57This is relevant to my interests.
  • BuG56, on 04/29/2009, -4/+40I would like it better if the author didn't use every opportunity to make fun of them. Condescending *****.
  • thebillgonadz, on 04/29/2009, -0/+34Dugg for hot chicks handling balls.
  • RileyCourage, on 04/29/2009, -0/+28Dugg for #19. And these are some mighty unfortunate team names. Mist? Gah!
  • angelgabe, on 04/29/2009, -8/+36Too much lingerie.
  • saranagati, on 04/29/2009, -0/+23strange i thought she was the best looking one... then again maybe i just don't equate tattoos with drug addict.
  • mattymc, on 04/29/2009, -0/+20Lingerie? More like Tank Top and Short Shorts Football League.
  • Narcism, on 04/29/2009, -0/+19Where's all my blood going?
  • decoy26517, on 04/29/2009, -1/+18Why are they actually playing football? Does anyone really care about that part?
  • rhdesigns, on 04/29/2009, -0/+16Absolutely no lingerie whatsoever. lame
  • AYOTTERIOT, on 04/29/2009, -1/+15I approve 100%.

    I approve 0% with the captions, though.
  • boosting, on 04/29/2009, -3/+17girl with tats ++1
  • electrikyle, on 04/29/2009, -0/+14I was wondering that, too, like the nerd who posted the photoset could do better.
  • frequentFlyer, on 04/29/2009, -0/+13lingerie football + 1/15 speed DVR replay. nuff said.
  • RatatRatR, on 04/29/2009, -1/+13I thought the tattooed girl in photo No. 7 was smokin' hot.
  • hyped, on 04/29/2009, -0/+10Great idea, but
    #1 slideshows suck
    #2 there's no lingerie

    next time write (no lingerie) or (sfw) in the title so i know not to bother
  • jumpenjack, on 04/29/2009, -1/+11i think that went over their heads
  • pmacATTACK07, on 04/29/2009, -0/+9Not even like half as awesome as the title led me to believe.
  • TwistyMcFister, on 04/29/2009, -0/+9Less clothes, more mud!
  • liquidsg, on 04/29/2009, -2/+10yeah but ***** ugly
  • inactive, on 04/29/2009, -0/+8Where do I get season tickets! Screw tickets, I want to be a part of the press, especially if they get a press pass to the locker room!
  • TKidd, on 04/29/2009, -0/+8not sure that was what he was getting at...


  • inactive, on 04/29/2009, -1/+9Are you a guy?
  • inactive, on 04/29/2009, -0/+8XFL Part 2
  • elshanero, on 04/29/2009, -2/+9Just do porn already.
  • Induane, on 04/29/2009, -1/+8I thought she was the best looking one too. Tattoos done right can be really flattering and attractive and I liked hers. I also like the look the main female role in Stranger than Fiction sported as she was really attractive and the tattoos complimented her physical beauty and attitude. This girl doesn't look like a drug addict to me, call me crazy. Tattoo /= drug addict/trashy.
  • SemiZero, on 04/29/2009, -0/+7I want to go to there.
  • haastyle, on 04/29/2009, -0/+6i wish i wasn't at work
  • PhreakMac, on 04/29/2009, -0/+6its SFW
  • drmangrum, on 04/29/2009, -2/+8Damn, the chick in red in picture 3 is stacked!
  • electrikyle, on 04/29/2009, -3/+8This is actually a really cool idea - but the patriarchal attitude of our culture will no doubt equate it with nothing more than eye candy. Of course, the title "lingere bowl" in itself denotes that... otherwise, they'd be wearing pads and helmets like any male team.
  • dolemite5005, on 04/29/2009, -0/+5You'd hit it.
  • GaltShrugged, on 04/29/2009, -0/+5This isn't lingerie. Not that I'm complaining.
  • Nicoon, on 04/29/2009, -0/+5No.
  • thomn8r, on 04/29/2009, -0/+5*Pentacle* of our technology and knowledge?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentacle
  • MagMan68Classic, on 04/29/2009, -0/+4I can honestly say that I didn't see any captions
  • alexllanio, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3a couple of hard bodies. Very nice.
  • inactive, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3ill be the tackle dummy
  • inactive, on 04/29/2009, -1/+4Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes... .and yes.
  • jm5chn, on 04/29/2009, -2/+5Nice scouting report!
  • Jc42, on 04/29/2009, -1/+4Dugg for scary huge arms!

    And ofc for bewbs
  • verynegative, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3Great ass.
  • Scrappy1850, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3she is hot, but NOT the best looking one.
  • blackcloud333, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3******
  • ell0bo, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3I'm more afraid of her then turned on...
  • dstrizzle69, on 04/29/2009, -0/+3If you want curves go to ur local golden corral
  • zabean, on 04/30/2009, -0/+3Wow.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 120 discussions

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.