What is Digg?100 Comments
- 0megaMagus, on 10/10/2007, -3/+207Here's a mirror: http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/089674.jpg
- johnkyoungoh, on 10/10/2007, -4/+128I don't want to know your name.
I just want, BANG BANG BANG - IShouldBeWorkin, on 10/10/2007, -7/+90This is older than the internet....
- Shad0wSP, on 10/10/2007, -12/+67WARNING: epic lulz ensue
- MasterThief117, on 10/10/2007, -7/+60Wow, this picture is so old, it came bundled with the ENIAC.
Its still funny though. - Canute, on 10/10/2007, -1/+31Seems like the database server is as well.
- Roger, on 10/10/2007, -3/+31D E D
- ruley, on 10/10/2007, -3/+25the server is a lulz killer
- benguild, on 10/10/2007, -2/+23You get pages that don't load?
- Rabbethan, on 10/10/2007, -3/+18Why was it posted in extreme sports??
- sjmueller, on 10/10/2007, -3/+17Hashmir, you look so good in that hat... why don't you give me lots of kiss....
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/bang.php - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13I am pretty sure first time I saw this, I had a 14.4K modem
- Xfer00, on 10/10/2007, -5/+18"Epic lulz"!? Domestic terrorists are on Digg now!
- 4040, on 10/10/2007, -1/+13Actually, Charles Babbage was the first to complete a digital description of this image.
- netkid91, on 10/10/2007, -8/+20diggs!=views
- Jowe, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12lulz is a corruption of lolz.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+12Actually, Charles Babbage was the first to complete a digital description of this image.
- dstart, on 10/10/2007, -5/+15Mirrorzor
http://danny.st/tmp/089674.jpg - bdbr, on 10/10/2007, -3/+13# First Digg algorithm
if ($title =~ m/Sex/) {
kill(server);
} - SpatulaTheMixer, on 10/10/2007, -2/+11mirror s'il vous plaît
- annihilator675, on 10/10/2007, -1/+9HE STARTED ***** HER WHILE SHE WAS WRITING THE LETTER LOL!
- jhuebel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8You burn calories having sex, no?
- chuuchdizzle, on 10/10/2007, -7/+14wow death came much too soon.
buried for ***** hosting - abyssknight, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7We do not forgive. We do not forget. We are legion.
- carecom, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Is it time for combo breaker yet?
- Gareshra, on 10/10/2007, -4/+11Look out! 4chanpartyvan is on Digg!
- bogart27, on 10/10/2007, -5/+11and, You Rock
- theCaptain, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7It's spelled 'Genius', genius...
- tsteele93, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Actually, Charles Babbage was the first to complete a digital description of this image.
- Synn, on 10/10/2007, -8/+12You know what else is old...calling things old. Seriously, I've never seen this before so it's new to me. Just because you've seen it does that mean others shouldn't?
- AnonymousFan9, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4"I can't get it up"
- mikesbaker, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4The pic in question:
http://bayimg.com/fAefaaabO - BlackMagic2, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Except for the fact that # of diggs has a relation to # of views, lets say, throwing a number out, 80 views per 1 digg give or take a few. Normally it will take x amount of traffic, or x/80 # of diggs before the site goes down. NORMALLY that number of diggs is HIGHER than 54 diggs or 54 x 80 views.
When somebody says 'wow, dead after x diggs' they don't think that only x amount of people saw it, that would be retarded. - tsteele93, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3And I'm pretty sure when you had a 14.4k modem I had a 19.2k USR modem. So there! ha ha!
- urbandistrict, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3No! Why don't YOU imagine that!
- bIuebonics, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5actually, he did. a site goes down due to the enormous amount of traffic hitting it at once for various reasons. to state in an incredulous manner that it went down after x amount of diggs is to state that you're surprised the server went down after the traffic generated from x amount of diggs. since traffic equates to page views... yes, he stated that the server could only handle the views in relation to the number of diggs listed. otherwise, there would be no reason to even mention the amount of diggs as it is obviously irrelevant to the number of views.
- jeo77, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3You know, it's sad. I agree with you, but even hearing the rebuttal to the "OLD" comments are getting old.
- nublet, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2i believe u meant to reply here:
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/85_yr_old_man_still_leasing_his_1952_phone_from_AT_T - lburgguy, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3I don't get it.
- duality, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Oh, simmer down. Just because someone says it's old doesn't mean they're saying it's bad. In fact, I hadn't seen it either, but saying that it's old just gives it a bit more context for me. Are you planning on campaigning against carbon dating anytime soon?
- ifknot, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I first saw this on daguerreotype
- ThatEvilGuy, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Damn, I'm an old man if we count in "Internet age"
I just had to read the title to know that picture the talk was about. - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2this is an old Soviet joke about a lady that is writing this letter to the newspaper Pravda. may be up to 70 yr old joke
- DesuKN, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Insert exploding van here
- saltmiser, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1NO U
- bogart27, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Your mirror was broken.
- OpCzar, on 10/10/2007, -3/+4Err, sounds like "surprise sex" to me...
- LQBMaV, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3of course you actually meant 'genius'
oh the irony is killing me - BestPker, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1wow really nice one :) I was actually trying to read the last part -__-
-
Show 51 - 99 of 99 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
