What is Digg?Sponsored by Rockstar Games
Grand Theft Auto: Episodes from Liberty City view!
rockstargames.com - Out Now on Disc for Xbox 360. Includes The Lost and Damned plus the all-new The Ballad of Gay Tony.
73 Comments
- DeskFlyer, on 07/09/2008, -4/+81Buried for 20 pages.
- johndavidjack, on 07/08/2008, -2/+44I'm sorry, but I'd only like to see maybe 50% of these women in bikinis...
- Glugory, on 07/09/2008, -2/+35No Veronica Belmont? Dugg down for inaccurate.
- flavioribeiro, on 07/09/2008, -2/+34Buried for ads, 20 pages, attention whores, irrelevant content.
You can find women like that walking on the street. You might as well go out with a camera and post "20 random women I saw in the last hour which would look good in bikinis".
As a matter of fact, put that in a blog without ads and I'll digg it. You don't even need to write anything. - alapoet, on 07/09/2008, -0/+21Did it really have to be spread over 21 PAGES?!
- shizer, on 07/08/2008, -5/+25I am outraged by this page's navigation!
but still dugg for *****. - hollywoodphony, on 07/09/2008, -1/+20Dugg for no Mark Cuban.
- Ouze, on 07/08/2008, -3/+19dugg for *****
- antz66, on 07/08/2008, -3/+16Yes please. Let's cut to the chase and see them in weasels.
- BeforeCalvin, on 07/10/2008, -0/+13Ladies and Gentlemen, a new level of internet creepy.
- TheWriteGuy, on 07/10/2008, -0/+12Xeni Jarden? Uh, sorry, no.
- jakethelake, on 07/08/2008, -1/+12Number 18 looks like she has a stache.
- panasianbiz, on 07/09/2008, -0/+10And if we didn't want to see them in a bikini, would that be okay, too?
- MasterTroll, on 07/10/2008, -0/+9Pretty sure #16 is a dude. Anyone?
- cawpin, on 07/10/2008, -0/+7http://www.urlesque.com/2008/07/08/bloggers-we-wan ...
Eww. Just eww. - aksoywilde, on 07/10/2008, -0/+7WTF? Burying because:
a) No Veronica Belmont, Lisa Bettany, iJustine, or Sarah Austin
b) The fact that it's a complete waste of my time. - DJWingMan, on 07/10/2008, -4/+11Buried for Ugly bitches...
and 20 pages... - vango, on 07/09/2008, -0/+6dugg for #1 even though that first pic isnt the most flattering
- ldkronos, on 07/10/2008, -0/+6I didn't go past page 2, but I'm presuming there was only one on each page, which makes it 21 pages since the first page was just introduction.
- BigPapi, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Half of these girls look like dudes. No digg!
- darkane, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Come on. It's the ***** internet. Say what you mean to say: "Bloggers We Want To *****"
Saying that you want to see them in bikinis makes it sound like you're 11 years old. - Gndoab, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4Nothing to do with being elitist. Everything to do with being annoying.
- inactive, on 07/09/2008, -4/+8Hi,
Dugg your article. we were friends before...but somehow now not..
take care - Sairynn, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4Twenty? More like five.
- MrTito, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4That's a man, baby!
- mark076h, on 07/10/2008, -0/+420 pages wtf i wonder how much ad revenue they are going to get from this
- DiggzDE, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4What is worse than a list of 5 things on 5 different pages?
A list of 20 things on 20 different ***** pages!!! - JCH897, on 07/10/2008, -1/+5Buried for inaccuracy: I would not like to see all of those girls in bikinis. In fact, half of them I could go without ever seeing again.
- inactive, on 07/10/2008, -0/+4Transgender.
- fani, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Um... it was good from 20 to about 16 then it got worse and worse. Was it a reverse list ?
yeah, I don't think I care to see them in bikinis on the internet when I can see lots of good chick without any clothes on the tubes - seanohara, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Who are these people, and why should I care?
- merrickx, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3Two words:
Star Wars Kid. - pedepy, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3TITTIES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- akohut, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3What about perez hilton?
- clickwir, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3***** that website. Give me a list or go home. I'm not clicking next next next next next. That's BAD WEB DESIGN. ***** you.
- feliks2, on 07/10/2008, -1/+420, 19, 27, 14, 13, 8, 5, 4, 2 = good
(12, 11, 1 maybe)
The rest are *****.
***** this is such a creppy post. - shauntacular, on 07/10/2008, -0/+3I stopped caring at 16
- cadmiumpaint, on 07/10/2008, -0/+2haha. i went to college with one of those girls. She was a drug addicted raver back then.....nice to see she's done something with her life.
- MooseTaag, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3Number 11! ***** the rest!
- LeeSoong, on 07/09/2008, -0/+2ya, but that one is a dude.
- Ronian12, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3They should make an article called "List of tools" and it would be comprised of everyone who comments on this page.
- slyphin, on 07/10/2008, -1/+3yah only like 5 of them are remotely attractive enough to warrant being seen in a bikini
- inactive, on 07/10/2008, -0/+2Are they prostitutes.Page after page got bored.
- exomni, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2Eww. About 90% of those I wouldn't hit with a ten foot pole. Not to mention 21 pages full of absolute *****.
- purelithium, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1What? No Jacqui Cheng from Ars Technica? She talks about her ***** in her tweets: http://twitter.com/ejacqui/statuses/849556590
(well, indirectly I suppose) - astericks, on 07/10/2008, -1/+2I'd rather not see a whole bunch of them in bikinis. They look naaaastaaaayyyy
- wellyuk, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Dear Urlesque,
Browser windows can scroll.
Yours,
Jim Bob - AdmiralAcbar, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1Buried for 20 pages.
- cstyles1200, on 07/10/2008, -0/+1twenty girls we would like to see in bikinis to induce vomiting and cause impotence
-
Show 51 - 75 of 75 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is