digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

See the original image at msnbc.msn.com

"Too Hot To Fly" Girls Actually Removed for Extreme Rudeness

msnbc.msn.com — Southwest Airlines spokesperson Beth Harbin says the police were called in to meet the flight in Los Angeles because “the girls were verbally abusive to another customer ... using profanities ... and getting in his face.”

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • Karmac, on 02/29/2008, -17/+494Based on that picture, they aren't even hot *shrug*
    • homer4199, on 02/29/2008, -139/+14Based on your conclusion, i came to the conclusion that your gay. *teehee*

      90% of the digg user base couldn't even come close to dating girls that look like them two. Inculding me but good thing no one will ever see this since ill by dugged down.
      • davdev, on 02/29/2008, -19/+49If you think that brunette is hot, there is something wrong with you. And I must be in that extreme 10% as I have had much hotter than either of those two.
        The blonde is mildly attractive, the brunette is her ugly friend.
        • 4rp4n3t, on 02/29/2008, -19/+5> And I must be in that extreme 10% as I have had much hotter than either of those two.

          Video or it never happened....
        • homer4199, on 02/29/2008, -12/+5While i sorta agree with you in the brunettes case, i completely disagree with you in the blonds case. She is hot i wouldn't say damn hot looking, she is in the middle. The brunette is cute, but looks like the bitch of the two.
        • Deffcom, on 02/29/2008, -5/+3nope. they r both ugly. sorry guy
        • ThndrShk2k, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1>"She is hot i wouldn't say damn hot looking, she is in the middle. The brunette is cute, but looks like the bitch of the two."

          Then she would be considered mildly attractive. Not hot. Hot is for highly attractive and above
          • GliTCH82, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Actually the blonde is the mildly attractive one, the brunette is just flat out ugly. And I normally prefer brunettes to blondes too.
          • ThndrShk2k, on 03/03/2008, -0/+1I was referring to the blond in the quote :P
      • ventralnet, on 02/29/2008, -16/+7I have to see some naked pix to make my final conclusions
      • stonebone4, on 02/29/2008, -3/+42They show one of them without (as much?) makeup and it's pretty grotesque. I said it in the other article and I'll say it again, "Lots of makeup != Pretty"
        • flashdrivecoup, on 02/29/2008, -3/+12Dugg for the logic operator; and also truth
      • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -4/+22They're "hot" because they're plastered with make-up. That's not the same as being HOT.
      • kokuei, on 02/29/2008, -7/+13You're pathetic. Get some standards, man.
        • homer4199, on 02/29/2008, -7/+7Go get a ***** sense of humor, kid.
          • GliTCH82, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2Yeah, way to bail out of a bad decision by trying to play it off as a joke. You're even more pathetic for that reason right there. Man up and admit you're wrong.
      • Cowboy1015, on 02/29/2008, -2/+5They're not that hot... but i'll take them for a 3some
      • staffell, on 03/01/2008, -1/+1you're*
      • 1randomguy08, on 03/01/2008, -5/+1I agree homer.These girls look alot better then 90% of the rest of the population and most of these nerds wouldn't even come close to getting a girl more attractive then these STFU hypocrites. That is all.
        Go to a shopping centre(mall) or your workplace and compare then females there to the ones in this picture(*****)
        • elmuerte17, on 03/01/2008, -0/+6... and the girls at the mall are hotter. you lose
        • mydigga, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1says the guy who's avatar is a picture of himself with his shirt off...
        • GliTCH82, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2Wow, I'm from Florida, what state are you from where your girls are so butt ugly?
    • Lunacy182, on 02/29/2008, -0/+91Yes, but just like how some beautiful women think they look ugly. Some ugly women think they look hot.
      • Syphon8, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Hate that kind.
      • narcofiche, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2But some beautiful women who think they're ugly are most likely fishing for compliments.
      • Ryosen, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1I've been around long enough to know that I'll take self-confidence over insecurity any day.
    • ell0bo, on 02/29/2008, -8/+166First off, homer... kma. 90% of the digg users here probably wouldn't want to date superficial girls like that, because we regrettably are slightly intelligent and enjoy having girls we can hold conversations with (granted it might be about topics about how it's shame Ron Paul didn't get nominated). Beauty is only skin deep.

      Second point, is it just me or has any else been noticing girls these days are becoming shockingly rude, full of themselves, and incredibly vain? Most girls I know now a days are worse then half the guys I know when it comes to being trust worthy in relationships and caring only about superficial appearances. Most girls can barely cook anymore, yet alone do half the stuff that's considered "womenly", but want me to act like a gentleman and pick up the bill all the time. Dating now is just messed up, and sadly it's girls like this that we get to choose from. Sometimes I feel as though I ain't looking for miss right, I'm looking for miss not the worst... Maybe it's just where I live and I need to move away?

      • blackbeardtron, on 02/29/2008, -2/+55No... that pretty much exactly sums up the way it is.
      • kevlarbaboon, on 02/29/2008, -23/+8Yeah, all me and my girlfriend talk about is how it's a shame Ron Paul didn't get nominated. We're highly intelligent people!
      • gotterdammerung, on 02/29/2008, -11/+69Guys these days are also becoming shockingly rude, full of themselves, and incredibly vain. As a girl, I get to pick from dudes who are wearing four polo shirts with popped collars, dudes whose reading is limited to Sports Illustrated, and dudes who think mentioning their salaries is a pick-up line. And that's not counting the ones who wouldn't even look at me twice because I'm not an obnoxiously loud blonde with a fake tan. Stupidity is ubiquitous - this cultural phenomenon you're positing is not limited to only one gender.
        • stonebone4, on 02/29/2008, -2/+42Dugg for mentioning the Coolness guy
        • AwesomeAndy, on 02/29/2008, -1/+39Hey baby, what do YOU think about the gold standard?
        • ell0bo, on 02/29/2008, -3/+18No it's not, but I'm not looking to find a decent man out there, now am I? I'm just commenting on the simple fact of a trend I've noticed arise over the past few years. Guys have always been tools, look back at history and you'll always find douche bags that were trying to pop their equivalent of more then 4 collars. Personally, i'm a fan of the victorian age where guys thought they should look like a giant V, with huge upper body and small legs.

          Instead I'm commenting that girls now a days seem to want more, while offering less. This has appeared to only be a more recent trend, but perhaps I'm mistaken. By the way, I prefer Brunettes, and if you can rock glasses while having a cute smile I'll all too gladly introduce myself. However, I'm sorry if the "cool" guys over look you because you're not acting a fool, but you're probably yourself overlooking the quiet, sincere guy checking you out; that's shared ***** less of making the first move.
          • gotterdammerung, on 02/29/2008, -0/+5Don't be sorry - I consider it kind of like a built-in culling process. I think you're right, but I'm just coming at it from a different perspective. (Also, I don't overlook quiet, sincere guys.)
          • robbh66, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1"because we regrettably are slightly intelligent"

            ROFL. You must be new here.
          • Borvo22, on 02/29/2008, -1/+16One has to keep in mind that females are the gatekeepers and can entirely control the way men act. Guys wear popped collars and use their salaries as a pick up line for one reason---It works! When it stops working, guys will stop acting this way. Too many women prefer the guy with the popped collar and inflated ego. While on the other hand, men are much more open to a wider variety of women. Sure, women like the ones we're discussing now will often get the first look of man because they look easy. If my one goal was to get laid would I choose the girl that's already half undressed or the equally attractive Tina Fey look a like with the turtleneck on? Another point to keep in mind is that men see the type of guys that are often extremely popular with the ladies in high school and college and will continue to emulate them until well into their 30's. I've always been amused how once women turn about 27 they no longer want the same type of guy they've wanted for the past 10 years, yet they wonder why guys still act that way.
        • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -2/+12You're obviously letting the wrong kind of guys take you out on a date. While there are plenty of guys like that (that I always have the urge to punch in the back of the head), there are even more "normal" guys who are more down to earth than you can imagine. It sounds like you're hitting up frat houses for potential mates rather than, say, the library or, hell, the grocery store (stay away from the beer and toilet paper aisle and you're golden).
          • gotterdammerung, on 02/29/2008, -1/+9Hey, I know there are plenty of guys that are not like what I described. A frat house is probably the worst place I can think of to look for potential dates, and I certainly don't attempt it. The comment I replied to said how hard it is to find girls who don't suck, and I was just trying to make it clear that it can be just as difficult for girls to find guys that don't suck.
        • nomadxx7, on 02/29/2008, -0/+11The problem is that society as a whole grooms people and tells them how to act. Be pretty, be thin, etc. The problem is that parents don't teach manners anymore and what teens/young men and women learn about manners comes from watching junk TV. Shows like my super 16 or spoiled realities shows are what people nowadays want to emulate. I was spanked as a kid, went through high school with low self-esteem and finally at 25 I'm starting to go from ugly duckling to swan. The thing I'm thankful for is that my earlier years taught me about humility versus narcocissm
        • GliTCH82, on 03/01/2008, -1/+1Yeah, blah blah blah, heard it all before. We get to pick from ice queens, gold diggers, girls who worry about breaking nails more than making a reasonable argument, and girls who would drop you the moment they realize you actually give a ***** about them because they found someone else who treats them like *****. There are exceptions to the norm, go find one.
        • thailand1972, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2"is it just me or has any else been noticing girls these days are becoming shockingly rude, full of themselves, and incredibly vain?"

          I disagree.....wait, I live in Thailand where women are generally well behaved, decent and have been brought up to consider other people's feelings.
      • triad203, on 02/29/2008, -1/+17There are plenty of other women out there from which we can choose. However, there is - and has always been - a high correlation between "beauty" and selfishness. Women who perceive themselves as attractive are more likely to be lazy and self-centered.
        • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -0/+9While lazy isn't always the case, self-centered is pretty much a given. I've had a few bad experiences with that.
        • Lythium, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7I'm lazy but not self-centered... is that better? ;)
      • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -13/+2Ah yes, support for Ron Paul is a sign of intelligence? more like a sign of idiocy.
        • kokuei, on 02/29/2008, -2/+6More like talking about politics is a sign of idiocy. I'd much rather discuss super-string theory, and binary duality versus infinity. Art would be a good topic as well. Unless you're in politics, avoid that topic.
      • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -1/+19I'm a married guy who is 37 years old and I know of what you speak. I started noticing the trend in my mid 20s. But, as others have pointed out it isn't strictly women. American culture seems to have embraced "attitude" as being an important part of being socially viable. It's sad. However, women seem to be increasing this type of behavior exponentially and slightly beyond the average man (douchbags excepted).

        The interesting thing about my wife is that the woman I dated before her claimed to be a vocal feminist. That was fine. My wife also supports feminism. However, one of many bones of contention she has with other feminists is the double standard. They STILL expect a man to pay for a date even though they're claiming to believe in equality. This took a bit for me to wrap my mind around. In fact, when she offered to pay for a date early on, or wanted to split the cost most of the time, I worried that it meant she wasn't interested. It took me a few years of dating her to accept this. Just goes to show you how many males are also programmed to accept these double standards. I think I lucked out with her. I don't suspect there are many females (no matter how enlightened they might be in other areas) who would agree that for dating to be truly equal, both participants should split costs equally.
        • stoanhart, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6My girlfriend is that way too. She's also my first real girlfriend. Maybe I just got lucky and missed the whole ***** dating game!
      • HigherLogic, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Wouldn't or couldn't...
      • Shinet718, on 03/01/2008, -0/+0ell0bo, you have to consider the fact that only spoiled girls do those kinds of things. They expect everything to come their own way or else they use vulgar terms and/or complain. Even between them, there are some girls who think they are "hot," and become prideful of that as well as take advantage of it.

        Through relationships, if the girl or guy expects you (the reader) to do everything for them, then there's no point in being in that relationship or matters worse, marry them and have children. Thus far, it's time for a change.
    • SuperWinner, on 02/29/2008, -3/+67I predict both these slunts will be spit out the bottom of the porn industry in 3 years.
      • arcangelgabriel, on 02/29/2008, -0/+10Debbie's double anal adventure in the Congo series?
      • Exbzurg, on 02/29/2008, -0/+32Hey, don't diss the porn industry. They have standards you know.
        • lowryba, on 03/01/2008, -0/+6You have not been on the internet for long have you?
      • phronko, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2Slunts?
        • igyigyigy, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Never heard the term before, but i'm guessing it's a mix of '*****' and 'sluts'
    • expatcatalyst, on 02/29/2008, -20/+2Yep, Paris and Nicole they aren't...
      • MillionsLivio, on 02/29/2008, -0/+26Those two are rude, ugly, unintelligent, and annoying; same to me.
        • rhyss, on 02/29/2008, -8/+3I thought the same thing, but after watching a couple of episodes of "The Simple Life", I was pleasantly surprised at how well behaved they were in difficult situations. And come on, Paris ugly?! Unintelligent we can drink together on.
    • daridave, on 02/29/2008, -2/+24Funny thing is, IMHO, if you look at the video on msnbc ... the lady who speaks... is way prettier than what I'm seeing in that picture. Jealousy? I think some girls need to stop using stupid excuses for being dumbasses...
      • merdiesel, on 02/29/2008, -1/+4Southwest did that on purpose.
      • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2To each his own. The two girls look like annoying *****, The spokesperson reminds me of what we used to call the "blonde fireplug sorority bimbos" when I was in college. Frankly, when it comes to "hotness" it's up to each individual as to what they consider hot. I always liked "older women" so my vote for hot goes to Amanda Donohoe: http://movies.nytimes.com/person/19583/Amanda-Dono ...

        I think she's way hotter than some dumb, big breasted 20-something airhead with attitude.
    • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -2/+12I agree, they are not hot, far from ugly, but not hot.
    • troye, on 02/29/2008, -12/+9These ***** bitches just made my state look bad. They will pay with their skull; I will hunt them down and skull ***** them >:{}
      • zaussome, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6That's just weird.
        • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -2/+3It's only weird if you aren't a primitive primate. Thank god some of us are evolved from Bonobos.
      • rhyss, on 02/29/2008, -2/+4Don't forget to buff yourself first. And if you have the opportunity, team up with a tank. That will improve your DPS.
        • Ryosen, on 03/01/2008, -1/+2I just want you to know that, if I had a crappy blog, with a bunch of crappy ads, that I wanted to hype up by spamming Digg with an assload of fake accounts, I would create 50 of them and digg you up with each one. But, alas, I have just this one account and, so, can only give you one digg, which makes it just all that much more precious. See?
    • SeligErasmus, on 02/29/2008, -1/+8Agreed. And what's up with those shower curtain earrings? What ***** year is this?
      • fabiosir, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Maybe Dell Griffith sold them to her at the airport.
    • byleth, on 02/29/2008, -2/+4Yeah, the only thing missing with these chicks is the cup. Although from the looks of them, they can improvise!

    • theradical, on 02/29/2008, -1/+7I'd still hit it
    • behlib99, on 02/29/2008, -2/+3I'd hit it again
    • Llanowar, on 02/29/2008, -1/+9I'd hit it thrice.
      With a lead pipe.
      Just for amusement.
    • AntBing, on 02/29/2008, -1/+3They both go to USF here in Tampa.
    • Veritate, on 02/29/2008, -2/+9I think they're hot. They're b*tches, and I'd never touch them with a ten-foot pole, but they're good-looking.
      However, I do have rather low standards for physical appearance. I try to lower my standards as much as possible, actually.
    • dcbebop, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3They'd be so much more attractive if I didn't already know exactly how annoying and inarticulate hearing them talk would be. I can almost hear their shrill, shrieking voices in my head now: a random thought drowned out by the excessive use of "no way", "like" and "omg".
    • JesusHatesYou, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7The Simple Life: White Trash Style

      They are NOT pretty. The blonde is average, but the brunette looks like the ugly ***** blocker that's the jealous friend who keeps you from hooking up in a bar.
      • VinceNoir, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1I don't think either of them are that attractive. They're about equal. Of course I also have a preference for brunettes over blonds. Not across the board, but in general, brunettes have tended to be much dirtier in bed. :)
    • SniperXPX, on 02/29/2008, -4/+3http://www.sniperxpx.fu8.com/digg/1337.jpg
    • BabyWookie, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2I bet that you only think that because they don't have penises.
    • PixelMagic, on 02/29/2008, -0/+10I have had it with these ***** skanks on this mother ***** plane!
      • MasterGrief, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Why doesn't this person have more diggs?
      • thailand1972, on 03/01/2008, -1/+1It's bad enough that Digg articles appear 12 hours after they're first shown on Reddit - but FFS, not the comments too.
    • prgmctan, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1The flight attendant in the video was so much hotter
  • kenyan, on 02/29/2008, -3/+214No, really? I was really sold that they were thrown off for being too hot...

    Why is this still news?
    • KraftDinner101, on 02/29/2008, -0/+8I said the same thing on the first story that hit front page.
    • Chassit, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2The same reason it was news before.
    • Godlike, on 02/29/2008, -0/+23Why was this EVER news? Why was there ever any doubt? Who ever gave a *****? So they are stuck up spoiled white trash whores, there are LOTS of those trust me... please just let this die because these bitches deserve no attention.
    • briguymaine, on 02/29/2008, -0/+12they will get famous from this and have lucrative porn deal before you know it.
    • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -0/+5Because being called out in a national news story is, well, somewhat vindicating.
    • hierophantus, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1Thank you, kenyan. By making that comment and giving me the opportunity to digg it, you have freed me from any further need to read this comments thread. Yours is the best possible response to this story.
    • johnnycyberpunk, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4What about the sad-faced adolescent male that was also thrown off for being "too ugly"? Why wasn't his story told?
    • JesusHatesYou, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3The story is that these 2 girls think they're hot.
  • bwhite, on 02/29/2008, -4/+203Only one way I can think of to shut them up.
    • wildfire, on 02/29/2008, -7/+24A kick in the throat?
      • Coven, on 02/29/2008, -3/+45if by kick, you mean *****, then yes.
        • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -0/+12I don't want them anywhere near my *****, no telling what STD you will get.
        • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -1/+11Eh, I have standards, ya know. Besides, with girls these days, a kick to the throat would be like an aphrodisiac to them: treat girls, especially shallow ones, like ***** and they're all over you. The best part is that you don't even have to pretend you give a flying *****!
        • hadak, on 02/29/2008, -2/+2I see what you did there...
      • jo3design, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1time to play the game "Who's In Your Mouth!?"
    • cmuwriter, on 02/29/2008, -3/+22duct tape.
    • Stupidumb, on 02/29/2008, -1/+38A brutal mushroom stamping?
    • flxfxp, on 02/29/2008, -2/+41I like where this is going
    • ronaldinho, on 02/29/2008, -2/+10I will happily do the honor
    • Mootabolife, on 02/29/2008, -7/+5Make them pose for a picture?
    • Ajajadude, on 02/29/2008, -1/+23Drop them off in the middle of Compton?
      • RobotKing, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3After sundown
      • nikkilai, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1I experienced this last summer, getting stuck in Compton at 7PM by myself with absolutely no knowledge of LA. I managed to hop on a bus to Pomona and made it safely to a friend's house. Compton was scary as HELL, but I still like the kick in the throat idea better.
    • gwellington, on 02/29/2008, -2/+16a dead lois?
    • uncrase, on 02/29/2008, -0/+14Waterboarding!!
    • warrenterr, on 02/29/2008, -4/+46a ***** in their mouth... (someone had to say it already)
      • Coven, on 02/29/2008, -1/+18and I did...3 hours ago...
        • DataSquid, on 02/29/2008, -2/+2And Bill Hicks did, many years ago. When it was realtime, and funny.
          • Coven, on 02/29/2008, -1/+237 people thought it was funny (as of 6PM EST)
    • Picaroon, on 02/29/2008, -1/+7http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/9750/n100515473 ...
    • Intenseboredom, on 02/29/2008, -0/+5taser?
    • wild, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1You people need to get out more...

      There is a whole world of crazy ***** to shut them up with,
    • jaej, on 02/29/2008, -1/+5throat *****
    • vikingkory, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6giggidy
  • RealmDown, on 02/29/2008, -2/+134This is a major reason why duct tape should be standard issue to Flight Attendants.
  • syxle, on 02/29/2008, -10/+195They're not "Hot".
    • SuperWinner, on 02/29/2008, -1/+7Slores
    • lolinyerface, on 02/29/2008, -11/+5Lies, you wouldn't kick them out of bed.
      • davdev, on 02/29/2008, -5/+19Being will to ***** them, and thinking they are hot are two completely different things. I would donkey ***** the crap out of them, but they aren't hot.
        • teh_techie, on 02/29/2008, -8/+4I'm sure you'd donkey ***** any hole...
        • lolinyerface, on 02/29/2008, -5/+3Wow, this guy gets dugg up and I get dugg down.
          Actually, its not very surprising.
          • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -1/+3No one with any intelligence would want them in bed. Period.
          • ScottyMcBaggs, on 02/29/2008, -2/+2Vince: WTF does intelligence have to do with ***** someone? Nothing, it has nothing to do with it at all, it's just an excuse for why you never get laid.
    • jasongb, on 02/29/2008, -3/+36Dug for the correct use of "They're".
      • Kappa00, on 02/29/2008, -2/+8Dugg down for the incorrect use of the past tense of digg.
        • darkane, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Buried for the use of the phrase 'dugg down'.
      • glacius99, on 02/29/2008, -1/+7Dugg. And dugg for the promotion of proper grammar.
      • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Dugg down just so I can be an ass today. Sorry. Nothing personal.
      • BrewBeau, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1They're just a lot of stupid people on Digg.
      • phronko, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Dugg down for, in addition to above reasons, capitalizing the first letter of a word in quotes. It's not a new sentence. Jesus ***** Christ.
        • jo3design, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Buried. Jesus can't ***** Christ.
          • phronko, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1Given that Jesus is God, and thus his own son, plus the fact that he has magic powers, I wouldn't be so sure about that.
    • orlyfactor, on 02/29/2008, -3/+3They may be IT hot, but not real world hot.
    • JonesJohnson, on 02/29/2008, -9/+2Dugg for the correct use of the period AFTER the quotation mark.
    • Ladymongoose, on 02/29/2008, -0/+0They sure think they are.
  • kiiwii, on 02/29/2008, -0/+99I hope they do a followup story with these two teens after they get ridiculed by everyone they see.
    • Nougat, on 02/29/2008, -22/+5Is this another school shooting in the works?

      (What, too soon?)
    • allahuakbar, on 02/29/2008, -1/+1I hope to hell that someone does - this should follow them for the rest of their lives. These stupid bitches probably never worked for a penny of their ***** - ***** spoiled whores...
  • ace429k, on 02/29/2008, -15/+8this was up last week

    gotta love mean bitches at 30000 feet.
    • Coven, on 02/29/2008, -1/+6"gotta love mean bitches at 30000 feet."

      especially when you see them about to get sucked into a jet engine.
    • carpespasm, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3especially when you hand them a paracute and kick them out.
      • SteveMax, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7Why would you waste a parachute with them?
        • Onyxblaze, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7who wants dumb bitch all over their rooftop?
          • GliTCH82, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1I'd rather make a trip to the carwash than have to meet the dumb bitch later.
      • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -1/+2no need for a parachute, with all the hot air in their heads they will float.
  • nubnub, on 02/29/2008, -9/+1REALLY?
  • badnewshotel, on 02/29/2008, -20/+3More crazy
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6sG9M1IIL4
    • KraftDinner101, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2How dare you sully the good name that is Gary Busey.
  • elvenseven, on 02/29/2008, -2/+119Too Bitchy To Fly.
    • theburningficus, on 02/29/2008, -3/+2 - And It Shows.
    • blackmage439, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Agreed. Completely ignorant whores like these are the reason why I'm no longer jealous of guys with extremely attractive girlfriends. A few of them (VERY few) actually have a brain inside their skull, but the vast majority are nothing but stuck-up bitches like these two ho's. I would be more than happy to give each of them a swift backhand to the face, and an education on politeness and respect towards their fellow [wo]man.
      • Meowbiusfox, on 03/01/2008, -0/+2Brother,You are right on.I just got rid of one.She was
        a ***** entitlement issue,narcissistic borderline personality disorder nightmare.
        As I began to read on borderline personality disorder,the truth became evident.
        Mix in drug abuse and childhood sexual abuse while you are at it and
        this is what you get(see photo)

        All my friends are calling me from out of the woodwork,congratulating me.
        Tomorrow,I am going to have two dates at once for the first time ever.
        And my middle finger is extended to the Pleaders at that using,class-less ,..you know,it starts with a "C"
  • godzillaWax, on 02/29/2008, -3/+350I have had it with these ***** flakes on this ***** plane
    • jasongb, on 02/29/2008, -14/+9I have had it with these ***** skanks on this ***** plane.
    • JibberGeorge, on 02/29/2008, -5/+3Comments like these are precisely why I can't stop visiting Digg every day.
      Well done mr. godzillaWax, well done sir.
    • TnTBass, on 02/29/2008, -1/+3I bet you are happy this story got posted again so you could use that line!
    • thailand1972, on 03/01/2008, -1/+1Copied from Reddit
  • tehrich, on 02/29/2008, -3/+12This has been said here already, whoop-de-dooo, we knew they weren't thrown off for being "hot" in the first place.
  • IPatrickBateman, on 02/29/2008, -18/+47Hot? You must be joking. They're at least a size 10+, from what I saw on the news.
    • roswell900, on 02/29/2008, -11/+22what's wrong with being a size 10?
      • mahler, on 02/29/2008, -8/+29He doesn't think it is attractive, can't you read? ;-)
      • ehalasey, on 02/29/2008, -5/+2Sizes that allow for more fun in bed are what's wrong with the world, didn't you know? Men want women who bruise easily and die in childbirth!
        • ucbmckee, on 02/29/2008, -3/+6You've clearly never had sex with a petite girl. Having dated both, there's just no comparison between how much better the sex is with the petite one. There are positions possible that you couldn't dream of with an 'average' sized girl. Plus, they don't bruise any easier than other girls.
          • ehalasey, on 02/29/2008, -4/+3Actually, you're wrong about that.
            Meanwhile, athletic beats petite in terms of versatility, ANY day.
          • ddawggin, on 02/29/2008, -5/+3Size 10 is not athletic. Size 10 is land whale.
          • ehalasey, on 02/29/2008, -1/+6You're a douchebag. Size 10 is MEDIUM.
          • maskd, on 03/01/2008, -1/+2@eshalasey: You obviously do not understand sarcasm.
    • mova, on 02/29/2008, -3/+2Ahh... fat attitude. That is even better. Mommy loves you just the way you are, so I will spoil the living hell out of her..
  • bradcrc, on 02/29/2008, -3/+82buried to stop these annoying whores from getting any more attention.
  • Cyberdactyl, on 02/29/2008, -31/+3As usual, MSNBC doesn't tell the whole story. The girls were throwing profanity around loudly and profusely when their so-called "hotness" didn't get them what they wanted.
    • calu99, on 02/29/2008, -1/+9did you read the article before you commented? It states that was why the got kicked off.
    • Kajico, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7Did you read the whole article or did you stop at the advert? It goes on to clearly explain why they were thrown off and how it had nothing to do with their "hotness" as well as giving these two some advice on how to properly behave on an airplane.
    • legendxx, on 02/29/2008, -0/+10As usual, another digg-tard comments before RTFA.
      • Cyberdactyl, on 02/29/2008, -12/+5Wah wah wah, I did read the entire article.
        However, MSNBC doesn't elaborate just how vulgar these two were. They insinuate they had a tantrum. They hardly mention just how profane these two spoiled brats were in front of several small children. Typical liberal MSNBC.
        Now, I realize your finger is shaking uncontrollably over the red thumbs down button, so you now have permission to click it.
        • legendxx, on 02/29/2008, -2/+5You're saying the world isn't going to loath these two enough? You want more hate? Everyone who reads this is going to disregard the entire incident.. but you're looking for a witch hunt? Typical liberal media not inciting to riot I guess, eh Cyberdactyl?

          Oh and the article spelled out almost verbatim what you said in your comment.. so how are we supposed to know you actually read the article? Guess I'm just another liberal who can't read minds.
        • JustFender, on 02/29/2008, -2/+2there is nothing ***** wrong with the english ***** language, there is only something wrong with your *****, ***** up, ***** of a mind....
  • xhazerdusx, on 02/29/2008, -2/+32Bitches need to get a life.

    They're really nothing all that special.
    • amoirae, on 02/29/2008, -0/+8This is what happens when fawning parents spoil their kids into having a toxic egocentric self concept that puts them above the "normal people."
  • kevro, on 02/29/2008, -51/+1They may have been ass monkeys but there is a truth hear. Good looking or confident people can get discriminated against, there's a lot more ugly or unconfident people out there, a lot lot more.
    • thejumbo, on 02/29/2008, -1/+15Did this guy defend these vapid wastes-of-space? Seriously, they are nearly worthless to the human race, and would only do good by donating their organs. Now.
      • ronaldinho, on 02/29/2008, -1/+6or be hookers I guess, I wouldn't go so far as to take their lives and organs
        • QuickeningYak, on 02/29/2008, -0/+9Fair point, the organs are probably retarded and dysfunctional also.
    • hockey, on 02/29/2008, -0/+28Did you actually hear these girls speak and give their side of events? Normally I'm not one for stereotyping but from the interview they sounded like the 2 most stuck up, egotistical, prima donna's I've ever heard.
      • kevro, on 02/29/2008, -3/+2I didn't hear them and I'm not on there side....just making a general point. (why is my bike going back wards?)
    • davdev, on 02/29/2008, -0/+18Oh yes, hot women have it so hard in our society. are you on crack?
    • legendxx, on 02/29/2008, -0/+10Here*

      If you're going to say something absolutely retarded at least use proper grammar.
    • QuickeningYak, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6What the ***** are you talking about?
    • BuckCynnie, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6Good looking and confident don't trump respect and kindness. Everyone reacts well to respect and kindness, regardless of looks and confidence.
      But ... I think you are mistaking confidence with inferiority insecurity; confident people don't act like asses.
  • thejumbo, on 02/29/2008, -2/+25Couldn't they have thrown them off in-flight? Or stuck them in the baggage compartment? Or just killed them? With knives?
    • Aidje, on 02/29/2008, -0/+11You would have to borrow the knife from a terrorist. Non-terrorists aren't allowed to carry knives on planes.
  • StanleyKoolPrik, on 02/29/2008, -3/+106Cannot fly. Reason: General *****-ism.
    • ReyX, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6Dugg for general elo-*****.
    • somecheesypoofs, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Now the guys at DHS are pissed they have to edit their 'no-fly' database with a "too hot to fly" field.
  • mpancha, on 02/29/2008, -0/+20I find it odd that these girls were allowed to go on air to begin with, and I hope the reporter who did the initial report with these girls (all of them, including talk shows) are ridiculed and booted off the air.
  • zantos420, on 02/29/2008, -8/+5this has already made front pages this is a duplicate of a story that already exists; the story is lame, the girls are NOT hot, and buried as duplicate
  • YodaJones, on 02/29/2008, -6/+4Skanky sluts... ha ha ha
  • Donatellooo, on 02/29/2008, -2/+9stupid bitches...
  • footodors, on 02/29/2008, -1/+5Cattle prods..that's what they need....cattle prods!
  • chrispix, on 02/29/2008, -6/+4Someone forgot a tampon, buried as dupe, and as I mentioned before, they are not hot.
  • Jade10145, on 02/29/2008, -4/+6This is an old story that was already on digg, front page I think. Regardless I hate girls like this. Just because you are pretty doesn't mean you have more rights then the average person. Not to mention that these broads are cocky about it to boot. Always remember, looks will only get you so far, no one wants to hear how good looking THEY USED TO BE when they get old. Intelligence trumps everything.
    • allahuakbar, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1It's probably because of their mommy and daddy's money - i bet they've never actually worked a day in their worthless lives.
  • iRelinquish, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3MJ Morning Show anyone?
    • mmzplanet, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1Apparently they want the girls to post a reply on YouTube...
    • ebrake21, on 02/29/2008, -0/+0kudos for catching it....Yeah mj morning show FTW! And since I'm sure not everyone here is in their listening market, the girls first outreach to the media was this morning show to whom they wrote an email with the title "Too hot to fly" to get attention. AND in case no one else knows this was a play off the too hot/too fat to fly problems SW had late 07. THE MEDIA picked up this title and ran with it. I don't think that this was a situation where the police should have been involved, i'm sure the flight attendant was probably bitchy, and I'm also sure that the fatass who was in the bathroom for 20 minutes probably DID start the tiff by cursing at the girl for being rude and knocking on the door. BTW you all know you're only calling them names and acting this way because of the anonymity the web provides, so grow up.
      • vikingkory, on 02/29/2008, -1/+1r u seriously telling people on the internet to grow up
  • JAGUART, on 02/29/2008, -1/+35Sad part is, there's tons of men willing to put up with their *****. We've done this to ourselves , really.
    • QuickeningYak, on 02/29/2008, -0/+18Those dumb little girls are high maintenance, insane, and probably retarded. I do not understand how other straight males can look at this ***** and see anything but a whirlwind of dysfunction dancing around a life of daily misery.

      The scary part is they're COMMON.
      • KennMac, on 02/29/2008, -1/+11One reason... and it's fleshy and pink.
    • kiiwii, on 02/29/2008, -0/+7It's no wonder the divorce rate is so high nowadays. Who would want to put up with that for the rest of their lives?
    • olbap, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3Stupid men will do anything for a little bit of pussy.
    • hansk, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1its true! im so weak!! :'-(
    • DreKor, on 02/29/2008, -1/+1Speak for yourself.
  • Stupidumb, on 02/29/2008, -18/+8I said it before and I'll say it again: Women should not have any rights.
    • AmericansRevolt, on 02/29/2008, -3/+2nah... it should be how it is but whatever happened to bein allowed to smack a bitch around once and awhile?! whats this world coming to!?!
    • Grindelwald, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1No one gave a ***** before, and no one gives a ***** now.
    • AmericansRevolt, on 03/01/2008, -0/+0haha they thought i was serious... wow
  • ispellkonfusion, on 02/29/2008, -3/+7You just can't trust pretty people.
    • triad203, on 02/29/2008, -1/+10They're not pretty. Pretty has nothing to do with trust. You can't trust PEOPLE.
    • allahuakbar, on 02/29/2008, -1/+3You can't trust spoiled rich whores.
  • nexus37, on 02/29/2008, -1/+11Stop the madness! Not hot, not news, not caring.
  • ArachnidDude, on 02/29/2008, -8/+2I be pissed too if the stewardess forgot to give me my f'ing drink. And bangin' on the ***** door was always par for the course at my house.
  • zeras, on 02/29/2008, -0/+10Good thing, We don't need idiots like them on the plane.
  • foneschlomo, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Am I the only person who didn't get the most flattering image of the writer when I read her opening sentence?
  • SavageBlackCat, on 02/29/2008, -12/+1Given Southwest Airlines history regarding the appearance of females passengers I'd say that the young women are more convincing.
  • badenglishihave, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Hotheads.
  • FlyingPhotog, on 02/29/2008, -1/+10Those Paris Hilton wannabes will have to borrow Daddy's Gulfstream IV next time. Poor spoiled brats.
    • JesusHatesYou, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2But I bet they know table etiquette and know which is the salad fork and which is the dinner fork just like Paris Hilton. Yet Paris still talks with her mouth full...of *****.
  • ronaldinho, on 02/29/2008, -0/+12Pretty or not, they deserve to be booted off the plane. The world doesn't revolve around those girls
  • darny, on 02/29/2008, -2/+30I'd hit it...
    In the face with a 2x4
  • pinguwin, on 02/29/2008, -1/+12I make no comment whether they were too pretty or not but I have to ask: Is being rude and using profanities worth calling the police about? Even if the girls were 110% out of line, why do the police have to get involved? I don't care if it's on a plane post 9/11, but why are the undies getting so bundled up that the cops have to question them for two hours. The stupidty, from profanities to the questioning, is getting excessive.
    • BuckCynnie, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1You're right, I would just have them launched from the aircraft.
      There is a huge problem with anyone risking the lose of control in an tiny environment at 30000 feet in the air.
    • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1Ever hear of SOP?
    • olbap, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6Because if you've ever ***** traveled on a plane, you know how short people's patience are. Nobody wants to get on a plane and have to deal with or listen to a bunch of ass hats. It is a "we are in this together" mentality when one boards a plane (unless you're in 1st class). It pisses everyone off when one or two passengers think they can play the "customer is always right" card just to get what they want when everybody else is behaving.
    • allahuakbar, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Travelling on a plane is much different than just being in the same building. People who already may be prone to claustrophobia or something similar don't deserve to have to deal with assholes or bitches in such an enclosed space.
    • leopardflames, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2these girls are not at a club, a friends house, a bar,...there really is no reason for them to act like they are barely 8 years old. i'd rather listen to a crying infant on a plane than a stuck up sack of douche juice.
    • purzzzell, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1Simple -
      1: humiliation may teach them to next time respect their fellow human beings
      2: they're eclearly unfit to function in normal society and probably should have a chaperone whenever they're in public
      3: to protect them from other passsengers who they started ***** with who may give them a problem once they're no longer confined to a plane
      • tony23, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1"humiliation may teach them to next time respect their fellow human beings"
        Doubtful
    • sweetemotion, on 03/01/2008, -0/+1If someone was ***** around being aggressive and mouthing off on YOUR x million dollar plane at 30,000 feet where small things can cause huge problems, wouldn't YOU call the cops?
  • evetsleep, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6There is A LOT more to being hot than just looks. Hearing stories like this actually make me sad because this girl is making herself look even worse (ha!) then she already did after acting that way on the plane.

    What a psycho hose beast.
    • designerutah, on 02/29/2008, -0/+0Way to bring back "psycho hose beast".. haven't heard that term in years.
      • evetsleep, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1I needed an appropriate and accurate description and yeah...that seemed to fit best in this scenario. ;)
  • therockymonk, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Southwest Airlines Response to Unruly Passenger Behavior - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPdSs3AiRhA
  • dropbox, on 02/29/2008, -0/+13Two soulless bitches receive reality check...News at 11.
  • Lowlypeon, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6Why is this story on the front page for a third time? It was obvious from the first report that these chicks are just spoiled bitches. No need to keep following up. Buried for lame.
  • mastameezy, on 02/29/2008, -11/+9Simple solution: Make it illegal for girls to speak.
    • bbqsalad, on 02/29/2008, -3/+1i lol'd
    • pentak, on 02/29/2008, -3/+1lol too
    • JesusHatesYou, on 02/29/2008, -2/+2That's why I love blowjobs. Kills 2 birds with one stone.
    • zombiedepot, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3You could always pack your bags and move to the middle east.
    • hansk, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1good idea! might as well take the vote away too while we're at it.
    • Tomson74, on 03/01/2008, -0/+0This just proves we have too many laws protecting our kids, nature always has a way of thinning out the herd.
      just like my 9mm,
  • atomicwedgie, on 02/29/2008, -9/+3Hell yea them hoes is hot! Of course I've been known to refer to Rossane Barr as "hot" after a pitcher of Long Island Iced Teas and half a dozen shots of Cuervo too.
  • brickbat, on 02/29/2008, -9/+2Ok, its looking pretty obvious that no one will agree with me on this but I think that its too much of a coincidence that they didn't give her water when she asked before the flight and then they "accidentally" passed her by when the drinks came around. I reckon the flight attendants may have had something against them. If you are being jerked around in that kind of situation by people that nowadays have way too much power, it can get pretty easy to lose your cool. Calling the police seems excessive too. Its not like they had a bomb in their panties - well not the terrorist kind anyway.
    • magamiako, on 02/29/2008, -0/+8First off, I've flown Southwest 3 times. I've never gotten water as the flight has started. If you want your own water to drink, take a damn water bottle onto the plane. That said, just be attentive when the attendants are coming around with something to drink. This sort of thing happens all of the time everywhere in life. Someone might have too few papers to hand out to you in school, you might get a paper that has nothing on it. Perhaps the pen runs right out of ink while you're in the middle of a test?

      ***** happens, get over it.
      • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1Getting passed over for drinks happens a lot, especially with people listening to music or sleeping, you don't realize the Flight Attendent is there until she has passed.
      • brickbat, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1"***** happens, get over it."

        Nice way to try to kill the discussion. I have no horse in this race mate. I'm just offering my view if thats ok. I still think that calling the police was excessive. If you think it was ok, then fine. I don't. I see a trend over the last 10 years of all these people we are giving power over us like police and security guards and flight attendants - that they are escalating things and threatening people instead of calming things down. I don't blame them. I think its their training. They are taught to see everything and everyone as a threat and as they say, when all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.
    • illegalcortex, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2I agree, it might be too unlikely. The most obvious explanation is that these girls are lying. Which part of their demonstration of character would make you take their word over any random stranger's?
    • designerutah, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2Now that you've made that assumption, turn it around. Why would a steward bother to "have something against them"? Their job is to make things go smoothly. If you were a steward, would you go out of your way to irritate a passenger at the beginning of the flight? First off, it usually takes some time for a steward to dislike a passenger, unless the passenger is a total ass. And when you deal with drunk, unhappy, complaining people crammed into a small space day after day, you learn to let the small stuff slide. It takes effort to "get back at someone". Why bother? Makes you look bad. Causes negative reactions in the passengers (making your job harder), and is in no way satisfying in the long term.

      You're right. I don't agree with you. Seen too many of these spoiled brats with the Diva personality. On first meeting them, you learn they expect the world to revolve around them... and they get pissy when it doesn't. Ordinary people exist to make their lives easier, and to appreciate how "hot" they are. Of course, when they meet a woman whose actually hot, or men who aren't impressed by skanky hotness, they feel threatened.
    • JesusHatesYou, on 02/29/2008, -0/+1It's a no-win. They were probably chatting with each other and if the stewardess taps them, they whine it's rude. Flight attendants will pass you by for meals/snacks if you are sleeping. It's not their job to read minds on whether you care to talk, sleep, or eat.
  • homerjs, on 02/29/2008, -16/+5USA USA USA..... ***** people in the US think they are entitled to more than they actually are, thats what's wrong with the place, nobody takes responsibility and feel they should be entitled to everything and be allowed to do anything ..Take some ***** accountability.... act like decent human beings.
    • magamiako, on 02/29/2008, -0/+2These girls don't have to act like decent human beings because as soon as they start taking their clothes off everyone pays attention.
    • BuckCynnie, on 02/29/2008, -1/+4Good god, another whinny bitch about the USA. Go pity party somewhere else, you ***** cretin.
    • designerutah, on 02/29/2008, -0/+4Wow homer. You just judged 240 million+ people by an amazingly narrow judgment. Way to go generalization king!
      • homerjs, on 02/29/2008, -5/+2yes I'm judgemental, designerutah ...or should I say fag, becuz all designers are fags
        • Railz, on 02/29/2008, -0/+3I dugg you because I thought you were joking till I saw you were the original poster.

          Oh well, still gave me a chuckle for being stupid.
        • designerutah, on 03/06/2008, -0/+0And now round two from the genius, where he again makes a snap judgment that turns out not only to be wrong, but based on an incorrect assumption too. "Designer" in my user name has nothing to do with interior design, or visual design, but DOES have something to do with creating (or designing) things... in terms of software engineering.
  • lburgguy, on 02/29/2008, -15/+2I'm sorry but anyone who claims that the blond in that picture is not hot is high on crack.
    • p0tent1al, on 02/29/2008, -0/+6Well call me Tyrone Biggums then
    • compdude32, on 02/29/2008, -2/+1I would have to say you thinking she is hot makes you high on crack.
    • VinceNoir, on 02/29/2008, -1/+3[DRAG ON PIPE] Ehhh... I'm still not buzzed and I think they look like satan's rectum. [DRAG ON PIPE AGAIN] Oh wait... they're startin' to look like the Landers sisters. [DRAG ON PIPE AGAIN] Ouch! Now they look like your mom.
  • tommytyker, on 02/29/2008, -0/+5/me chants, "Jerry.. Jerry... Jerry.."

    These pigs are good for nothing more than an appearance on Jerry Springer.

    What ugly little horses.. and as someone above wrote, many guys in many places will think their s**t will not stink. Shame on their parents for producing such litters
    • rinote, on 02/29/2008, -0/+5"WHATEVER HO, YOU DON'T KNOW ME! YOU DON'T KNOW MY /LIFE!/"

      Oh Jerry, what would we do without you?
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 155 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.