What is Digg?350 Comments
- neau, on 11/11/2007, -60/+808LOL
- 1KrazyKorean, on 11/11/2007, -30/+752That is so stupid its funny! Dugg =)
- Digitalfilm43, on 11/09/2007, -10/+470Unexpected. I thought it would be blog spam explaining stupid basic photography. I was wrong.
- cmgarcia, on 11/06/2007, -2/+240On behalf of the rest of the digg users, thank you for not using some stupid title, nor a description that would kill the joke.
- hiddencatch, on 10/16/2007, -28/+250photoshopped!
- MavRevMatt, on 10/13/2007, -13/+193To: Digg@earthlink.com
From: Grandma@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: Fw: FW: FW: Fwd: THIS IS SOOOO FUNNY!!!! - roastedbagel, on 11/11/2007, -7/+153At first I thought "great another stupid picture that will of course make it to the front page." This was hillarious, it definitely caught me off guard.
- MichaelE777, on 10/26/2007, -3/+136Well, its better than reading about a guy risking drowning so he can save his beer bong.
- GCarden, on 10/12/2007, -9/+95Too bad there's no Flash on the iPhone.
- theworldisflat, on 10/12/2007, -8/+72Holy crap, I've managed to awaken in 1999! Time to buy some yahoo stock.
- pault107, on 11/10/2007, -6/+61Because saying "this is almost as old as the internet" is almost as old as the internet.
- DocHoliday22, on 10/10/2007, -3/+56Trust some moron to kill the joke...
- ilkeryoldas, on 11/11/2007, -14/+66just in case: http://www.ilkeryoldas.com/digg/flash.jpg
- tlogank, on 11/12/2007, -12/+63Normally I would have dugg a comment like this down, but there isn't much more you can say. I am promoting this to my #1 story on Digg for awhile, it actually made me LOL.
- Platysquirrel, on 10/10/2007, -5/+55If you're going to bitch that this wasted your time then what are you doing on Digg?
- rspeed, on 11/02/2007, -2/+47You must be so disappointed.
- gibsonic, on 11/02/2007, -8/+47i was expecting one of those pictures where without a flash, the woman is just wearing an nice dress, but with the flash the dress becomes practically see through.
- whiskeymb, on 10/12/2007, -3/+39You and your parent commenter are being dugg down because:
A. So what if it's as old as the internet, there are still people who haven't seen it (I'm about as much as a internet junkie as anyone I know and I hadn't seen it)
B. Thinking that the factual accuracy of someone's statement is the only thing that determines their digg rating. - mtalon, on 10/12/2007, -2/+29Oh god...that was painful. A true "title says it all" moment. :)
- therealNofutcha, on 10/10/2007, -15/+42this is really old. But i still laughed, cause even old stuff is funny
- inactive, on 11/09/2007, -1/+26over 9,000
- van8888, on 10/10/2007, -2/+26/facepalm
- thcobbs, on 10/10/2007, -2/+26It took you 5 seconds to look at a picture?
- kaldrenon, on 10/10/2007, -3/+24Agreed - I hadn't expected quality. I was pleasantly surprised.
- racco, on 10/10/2007, -4/+25dugg because it made me smile :)
- imtigger2, on 10/10/2007, -8/+28Wow.. all you morons with negative marks truly don't get how stupid YOUR remarks sound, do you. NO JOKES FOR YOU!
- Preacherman, on 10/10/2007, -4/+22Thanks for explaining the concept of a "punchline" to us. That's very helpful.
- miriclaire, on 10/10/2007, -1/+19People whose only comment is to note that a pic is old are generally dugg down as self-centered whiners.
- bloominoctober, on 10/10/2007, -2/+19totally unexpected ... and funny.
Dugg. - zach99998, on 10/10/2007, -1/+17no, that's Flash
- timdorr, on 10/10/2007, -7/+23Just in case? Check your email archives. I know I've been forwarded this in the past.
- donkevin, on 10/10/2007, -3/+19*it's
- jamdogg, on 11/09/2007, -11/+27395 diggs for "LOL"?
- nonzzero, on 10/10/2007, -3/+16Those are usually reserved for articles with no pictures.
- DesignerScott, on 10/10/2007, -0/+12I was about to bury it for being such a crappy comparison too.
- greenjelly01, on 10/10/2007, -3/+15lol
Not to mention "forward this to everyone on your list"
and "If you digg this in five different user accounts, your gay love will kiss you through your monitor in the next 3.45 days" - bloaty, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14And how much time did it take you to write that comment?
- bsolidgold, on 10/10/2007, -2/+14If you don't want spoilers or 'moron[s] kill[ing] the joke' click the link to the story *before* reading the comments.
- revjustin2, on 10/10/2007, -2/+13Is Digg just a forum for you people to show how jaded you are?
"been there. done that. buried as lame." - TypeEE, on 10/15/2007, -2/+12I was about to click on bury to see if this is another article to teach you how to take great pictures with cheap cameras.
This is funny. - eohano, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Well, he had to whine about it in the comments, it must've taken more than 5 seconds.
- nhassan, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10well kevinrose did digg it.
- TKn00b, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Just FYI the nokia n800 has a touchscreen and thus no mouse based interface, and it supports flash 9. So it is very possible, but Apple just does not want to support it.
- thefreak, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10This is probably one of the funniest albeit simple things I have ever seen. Nice.
- chris9902, on 10/10/2007, -2/+10I too thought it would be a webpage with text but then I remembered the link was from digg and it seems they have no use for primitive letters and numbers.
- skealoha86, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9It took me about 4 hours to get this...
- Wormfather, on 11/09/2007, -3/+10What are you mad! Yahoo?
I'm not even a fan boy but I'd buy Apple, LightSweetCrude, WSJ and short the ***** out of Enron...I'd also take a trip to see the Twin Towers :-(
But I wouldn't buy Yahoo. - Rodman930, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8No. He was being ironic. because it really was photoshoped. sarcasm would be saying, "This wasn't photoshoped." see the difference?
- MavRevMatt, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8No.
- Yazoo, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8Just once is enough.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 339 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
