digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About
See the original image at news.bbc.co.uk

Man Arrested in Venice for Photographing 3000 Women's Asses!

news.bbc.co.uk — A man who allegedly photographed more than 3,000 women's bottoms as they toured Venice has been arrested. The man was stopped after police became suspicious of a large bag he was carrying as he followed women through St Mark's Square.

Who dugg this? Made popular May 13, 2008

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

172 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • jmpeagle, on 05/13/2008, -1/+243pics or it didn't happen
  • painperdu, on 05/13/2008, -3/+88The Venice police are anal.
  • inactive, on 05/13/2008, -0/+873000 !!! ...That's passion ...
  • liamvictor, on 05/13/2008, -0/+69It's good to have a purpose in life.
  • Supernova36, on 05/13/2008, -2/+60Isn't this actually not illegal?

    Creepy yes, illegal no..
  • khaosx2030, on 05/13/2008, -1/+36Anyone have a torrent?

    :D
  • DeadSkinMask, on 05/13/2008, -5/+35Welcome to prison: Where men do a lot more with your ass than just taking pictures...
  • blackinthmiddle, on 05/13/2008, -1/+31Well the way I understand it, if the camera is catching something that the eye would normally catch, it can't be invasion of privacy. I think since he tried to film up girls skirts, it's considered an area that someone would normally not see in public. This is b.s, of course, because girls in short skirts show their asses all the time. But they'll probably go after him aggressively because of the upskirt stuff.
  • inactive, on 05/13/2008, -0/+29idiot, why was he carrying all his backups with him at the time. hasn't he heard of flickr??
  • RMSzero, on 05/13/2008, -3/+26Just remember, kids. Always shoot in high quality and then crop the pic down to the ass LATER.
  • mescad, on 05/13/2008, -0/+24Maybe the 3000 were really just what he'd taken that day.
  • jellygraph, on 05/13/2008, -4/+29Well, its certainly weird behaviour, but he didn't harm them in any way and I don't see how this can be illegal. The women deliberately chose to wear mini skirts in public, so I dont see how it can be viewed as infringing their privacy, when they made it not so private.

    Of course, maybe I'm making too much sense.
  • BMNB1tches, on 05/13/2008, -5/+29If we were in prison, I'd protect him in the shower.
  • dangerfieldj, on 05/13/2008, -2/+23"that's a cheeky crime"
    Ha
  • lukak, on 05/13/2008, -5/+22it's over nine thous.... oh wait, no it isn't.
  • Arkz, on 05/13/2008, -0/+14Dammit man i came here expecting pictures! SHOW ME FINE ASS!!
  • amdahlj, on 05/13/2008, -9/+24So...much...pressure...to...make...witty...comment!

    OM NOM NOM?
  • ReGGsRoom, on 05/13/2008, -1/+14I don't believe any of this nonsense. Lemme see the pictures first and I'll make my own judgment.
  • MikeSD34, on 05/13/2008, -1/+13In a trial you present evidence to prove or disprove your point. It's usually essential in getting a conviction.
  • blackinthmiddle, on 05/13/2008, -1/+13The fine line is drawn when you take a camera and shove it up a woman's skirt.
  • burketo, on 05/13/2008, -0/+12i wouldn't call that a fine line... more of a giant leap.
  • username7D8, on 05/13/2008, -1/+12"Hey ass man!!"

    -Giddy up!
  • fr3ddie, on 05/13/2008, -6/+17might I add... NO FAT CHICKS.
  • DeadSkinMask, on 05/13/2008, -0/+9I feel sorry for people like you.
    Please, for the benefit of everyone around you, seek an education.
  • qpid, on 05/13/2008, -0/+8To add another person to my block list
  • haydesigner, on 05/13/2008, -0/+9Over last *year*.
  • DeadSkinMask, on 05/13/2008, -1/+9too easy.
  • RealmDown, on 05/13/2008, -0/+8PLEASE BE OVER PLEASE BE OVER PLEASE BE OVER
  • inactive, on 05/13/2008, -0/+7How the ***** many accounts you got, you ***** waste of oxygen?
  • pcronin, on 05/13/2008, -0/+8"boys will grow up withan irrational fear of getting close to any woman."
    um.. too late.
    ever see "Disclosure"? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109635/

    i read this book when i was younger, and realized how true it was getting. I can barely *look* a the "company ink" let alone dip my pen in it.
    all it takes now a days is a look. some how, glancing at "betty's" too tight sweater/pants, or office inappropriate plunging neck line is me 'harassing' her.

    At the risk of sounding misogynistic (and i'm not, I love women) we need to return to the time when sexual harassment was "sleep with me or you get fired/never promoted". if "betty" wears an outfit more suited for a club than office, she should be told to go change, and/or deal with the stares she obviously wanted.

  • DangerMouse9, on 05/13/2008, -0/+6The lonely digg user court.
  • pault107, on 05/13/2008, -1/+7Jelly or syrup?
  • Coffeedemon, on 05/13/2008, -0/+6Must be an ***** contest.
  • diablo2032, on 05/13/2008, -2/+8its not his fault their asses kept getting in the way of his shots..... ;-)
  • paulvq, on 05/13/2008, -0/+5He didn't have a pro account.
  • RealmDown, on 05/13/2008, -0/+6Stellar comment, but it could have been worse -- it could have been Uranus.
  • zwendkos, on 05/13/2008, -1/+8he's clearly a digg member
  • SuperVepr308, on 05/13/2008, -1/+6Wouldn't they all start to look the same after awhile? How many asses are enough? He should throw some boobs in there for good measure and make a T&A collection.
  • inactive, on 05/13/2008, -0/+5You dumb *****!
  • OfficialJoe, on 05/13/2008, -1/+7You like
    small
    BUTTS and you cannot lie...
  • bsonline, on 05/13/2008, -2/+7Nope. That one was over last week.
  • thewump, on 05/13/2008, -4/+8You have got to be ***** me! You think that it's acceptable to walk around with a hidden camera trying to see up peoples skirts, probably for the purpose of making money online, and that this is not a violation of privacy? You, my friend, are a ***** spanner.
  • RealmDown, on 05/13/2008, -0/+4Think of the "Cookie Monster" doing what he does best.
  • mlvassallo, on 05/13/2008, -0/+43000? Wouldn't this be considered art at some point?
  • belebih, on 05/13/2008, -0/+4Excuse me, are you from the past?
  • christophe971, on 05/13/2008, -0/+3If they check correctly, i'm sure they can find >9000 pictures...
  • AzureRise, on 05/13/2008, -0/+3Actually he's from the future where OJ has just committed another crime.
  • Nerotique, on 05/13/2008, -7/+13More proof of radical feminism run amok. If you don't want your ass on film, cover the damned thing up. I'm not saying this guy isn't creepy, but he certainly shouldn't be going to jail. If ***** like this keeps up, boys will grow up with an irrational fear of getting close to any woman.
  • eliotmat, on 05/13/2008, -0/+3That last paragraph of yours is dead-on.
  • eliotmat, on 05/13/2008, -1/+5What is "OM NOM NOM"?

    I still haven't been able to figure it out.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 172 discussions

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...

© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.