Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
- 3266 diggs
- digg it
- Jezmeister, on 10/10/2007, -55/+4Can't see anything.
- doctorfungi, on 10/10/2007, -1/+84Make sure you're looking at your monitor and that your eyes are open after clicking the link.
- dranire, on 10/10/2007, -43/+1Make sure you mom isn't a fat bitch and that your face isn't stupid.
- Bull3t, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6That was so ***** lame, dranire. You tried to milk a joke that didn't need milking, nice one.
- h0merg0mez, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6You have contributed nothing to society.
- DaffyDuck, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1"That was so ***** lame, dranire. You tried to milk a joke that didn't need milking, nice one."
Oh snap! - HueytheFreeman, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Phew it's a good thing only his face is stupid. At least the rest of his body is quite intellectual.
- dranire, on 10/10/2007, -43/+1Make sure you mom isn't a fat bitch and that your face isn't stupid.
- Jezmeister, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15The dog can't see anything ... ok nevermind epic fail
- ChileanGoD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4I got it on the first read. Some people have this weird talent of finding the most ridicule or shaming meaning of your comment and shoot it back at you.
- Bull3t, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Yeah, very true. Normally it only happens to the very first commenter, because those very same people are lazy ***** and know that the first comment will be read first.
- ChileanGoD, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4I got it on the first read. Some people have this weird talent of finding the most ridicule or shaming meaning of your comment and shoot it back at you.
- doctorfungi, on 10/10/2007, -1/+84Make sure you're looking at your monitor and that your eyes are open after clicking the link.
- lakush, on 10/10/2007, -7/+187wrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- MasterThief117, on 10/10/2007, -3/+13NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
- Tunguska, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5.... this on goes there, that one goes there.
- thedragon4453, on 10/10/2007, -7/+5Damnit. my first thought was to login and and leave a comment like that.
Well played, Sir. - H0tKarl, on 10/10/2007, -3/+23I always wondered how that was spelled.
- Jleagle, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1*deleted*
- gfair, on 10/10/2007, -2/+0subtitle: "zippit"
- keyboardduder, on 10/10/2007, -24/+15Chewbacca! Hes a Wookie! (errrrrrrrghhhhghhhhghh) Chewie! (Chewie, is that you?)
- GTanaka, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7Clerks FTW.
- H0tKarl, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5"What a Wookiee!!!!"
- keyboardduder, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Finally, after getting dugg down a few people who saw clerks are here
- doctorfungi, on 10/10/2007, -12/+293I swear making a picture section couldn't be THAT hard...
- Junkey, on 10/10/2007, -5/+39I agree, seeing 2 or even 3 pictures in the top new section is stupid as *****. I want News in a news section, not stupid pictures.
- thejoker86, on 10/10/2007, -5/+0lol yeah they made this damn comment system, which im still conflicted about weather i like it or not... couldnt be too much of a stretch to copy the code for the news section, search and replace news with "pics" and maybe do some other customisations later...lol
- unloud, on 10/10/2007, -3/+33Maybe we should pull a DVD-Encryption-Like revolt in which we only submit and Digg pictures until we get a response.
I'm all down for LOLcats and baby Chewbacca pics for a day if it's for a good cause.....- InitialDMP5, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9That was done already, and nothing happened. All the top 10 stories were [PIC] titled. Kevin has said in interviews that a Picture section is coming in the next update of Digg. I really don't understand why it wasn't added when the video section was added though. I guess that would make it one step closer to Break.com, and even less like slashdot. I'm not sure if either is a good thing for Digg.
- InitialDMP5, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9That was done already, and nothing happened. All the top 10 stories were [PIC] titled. Kevin has said in interviews that a Picture section is coming in the next update of Digg. I really don't understand why it wasn't added when the video section was added though. I guess that would make it one step closer to Break.com, and even less like slashdot. I'm not sure if either is a good thing for Digg.
- digichris, on 10/10/2007, -8/+2Lol why u guys so upset about pics showing up on top news? Just don't click ffs.
- hfactor, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Why u guys so upset about hairs in your soup? Just don“t eat ffs.
- maisteri, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0But I guess listening to people is..
- Junkey, on 10/10/2007, -5/+39I agree, seeing 2 or even 3 pictures in the top new section is stupid as *****. I want News in a news section, not stupid pictures.
- zomgflamer, on 10/10/2007, -20/+5That dog would taste so damn good with A1 BBQ sauce.
- brucemanly, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3I don't care if you're joking. that's just wrong
- koolaiddude, on 10/10/2007, -10/+3dugg for the clerks reference.
- JavertHolmes, on 10/10/2007, -14/+4So when did my grandmother and her friends start reading Digg? Mabel? Edith? Bertha? Edna? Beatrice? Is that you?
- Pix869, on 10/10/2007, -1/+99I remember when Offbeat news used to contain...Offbeat news.
- monka, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9i don't
- crawf061, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Considering you only joined in March, there is no way you could have remembered
- knightblade2oo4, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1i've been here over 2 years now and I don't remember it.
- crawf061, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Considering you only joined in March, there is no way you could have remembered
- Endeavorer, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1I remember when Offbeat news used to contain... Beatoff news.
- monka, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9i don't
- crackah, on 10/10/2007, -16/+2No its not! its a dog!
- PinkoComrade, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Well aren't you deductive!
- briarmoss, on 10/10/2007, -6/+1no actually, he's abductive. You however, are just wrong.
- fudgeigor, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10Who got abducted?
- PinkoComrade, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7Well aren't you deductive!
- shieldsikebana, on 10/10/2007, -16/+1***** you
- SmokeAbowl, on 10/10/2007, -8/+3yes!
- LordByr0n, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2You sir made me want to smoke a bowl
- LordByr0n, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2You sir made me want to smoke a bowl
- DesertWolf, on 10/10/2007, -11/+4(Huttese) Chee sa, be cha ha wonky chewbacca
- holygram, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10Tell me if he talks back to you...I'm going out with friends.
- badjoke, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Nerd alert!
- Sinistocrat, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2This is Digg. You can go into any topic, yell "NERD ALERT!" and be absolutely correct.
- holygram, on 10/10/2007, -10/+3Chewbacca + Alex Albrecht.........?
- markwilcox, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1...Profit!
- holygram, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9In retrospect, that was really dumb.
- mrASSMAN, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Glad you learned a lesson today.
- amunimanghi, on 10/10/2007, -9/+12Buried for not being a baby.
- mattdanis, on 10/10/2007, -2/+33I've got a bad feeling about this.
- BossKey, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6Let the Wookiee win.
- databoy, on 10/10/2007, -8/+0Hairy Dawg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- tMANwi, on 10/10/2007, -9/+4It's a trap!
- bioncinola, on 10/10/2007, -11/+1Makes me feel horny !
- justdru, on 10/10/2007, -6/+9Imagine the dingleberries on THAT thing!
- Sk1ppy, on 10/10/2007, -9/+9Yeah well my dog looks like a Ewok, and Ewoks are better.
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/A_Real_Life_Ewok- krunchy, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3WICKET!!!!
- dRuNk3nIrIsHmEn, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1I've got a Shih Tzu with the same coloration and I always call her an Ewok too.
Glad I wasn't the only one that noticed the resemblance.
- dallyp, on 10/10/2007, -10/+19This ***** is STUPID!
How in god's name is this "news?"
Ugh, we need a ***** picture section. - carebearwarrior, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12Who's scruffy looking?
- MagicCake, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Laugh it up, fuzzball.
- vagrantwade, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9FYI, that is the exact same breed of dog that George Lucas owned, and whom chewbacca's appearance was based off of. The dogs name was Indiana. Hence Indiana Jones. So it is logical that that specific dog would bare resemblance. Just saying.
- FoxtrotUSAF, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4START THE SHIIIIIIIIIP!!!!!!!
- bluenile, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2Pictures or it didn't happen.
- demonburner4, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0Where baby Han?
- swhite76, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Anyone familiar with the Star Wars Holiday Special? Lucas named Chewie's kid "Lumpy" and had the family celebrate "Life Day". Guh. At least the special launched Boba Fett.
- dangerpowers, on 10/10/2007, -5/+0Freaky looking dog!
But for a real baby wookie check this out:
http://www.landofthephotos.com/real_baby_wookie.html - postaldave, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1careful michael vick, he is a wookie. you don't want to go there.
- bindasj, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Newsflash!! Anti-digg supporters are posting lame pictures in an attempt to kill the digg userbase.
- Shakermaker, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6How the ***** does this ***** make the font page - is Digg broke again?
- Matrix_Prime, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Digg was broke when it went mainstream.
- Zachus, on 10/10/2007, -6/+2What is stopping you from ignoring the pics? QUIT ***** BITCHING!
- ShinjiTheGale, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2That's not Lumpy...
- dep01, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4***** stupid.
- gmavz, on 10/10/2007, -9/+1Star Wars anything = buried as lame
There are other types of people on this site - kayleighw, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3More proof that Digg is turning into Cute Overload
- shanevendrell, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3I misread the headline as "Busty chewbacca"
- nerd64, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1dare i ask why you still clicked the link?
- kidcodea, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1nice dugg!
- getsk3wled, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3wtf?
who cares....why is this on the front page.....
buried. - XxERMxX, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0I see a picture of a dog. not a hairy baby.
Boo on OP! - deckard50, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5that's a ***** dog. buried for pure lameness. jesus.
- Somnabot, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1How does this get 2000+ diggs, and yet "Jessica Biel getting naked for new role" ( http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/Artists/B/Biel_Jessica/2007/08/16/4422711-ca.html ) doesn't come close?
- zachshmack, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Buried as lame, because I'm sick of PICS.
- TailsTheMan, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Chewbarka
- thekajunpimp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1cute dog in picture that is, interested I am not.....
- elguapo1976, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1buried for utter waste my time *****
- fullerton, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There should be a separate "lame crap" section for stuff like this. It sucks but I am taking Digg's top stories off of Google reader because all it ever seems to be anymore is dumb pictures and Ron Paul propaganda.
What happened to the news?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our