49 Comments
- Waskonator, on 12/27/2007, -3/+32This is one of my all time favorites.
Gets me every time. :-D
http://www.bobpitch.com/anon/bigbabyjebus_Channel- ... - StealthMonkey, on 12/27/2007, -2/+29Did someone really just submit Google search results? And we are digging this?
- thickdrummer, on 12/27/2007, -3/+22I'm so glad to see that the Zune Tattoo guy is on the second page of results!
- borninda818, on 12/27/2007, -1/+165.3 w/o safe search filter for me...NSFW fail?
- cannarymburns, on 12/27/2007, -1/+8I guess you fail at looking through fail...
- DefaultGen, on 12/27/2007, -5/+12How is this even remotely worthy of Digg? I guess digg me down... Google image search fanboys.
- inactive, on 12/27/2007, -1/+7I think sux monkey has a safe search filter on. Then again, I got 5.4
- highPhone, on 12/27/2007, -1/+7facepalm.jpg
- earthwormcowboy, on 12/27/2007, -2/+8I hate you people who comment on Digg. EVERY comment has to be a positive one, and if it's not, "Oops, Hide that one, it's negative!" What if the Digg is lame? Doesn't anyone have a differing opinion?!
- Miche1987, on 12/27/2007, -0/+6Hmm, had me fooled, it's not like "boobs" is in the URL or anything...
- Jeffler, on 12/27/2007, -1/+6Results 1 - 21 of about 5,960,000 for fail
In other words, its gonna be different for a lot of people. - allaboutdatiki, on 12/27/2007, -2/+6I'll raise ya 100K... 1 - 20 of about 4,270,000 for fail
- mikehill33, on 12/27/2007, -2/+6PS3 = FAIL.
- suxmonkey, on 12/27/2007, -3/+6lol I did have the safe filter on yah
- roguedragon, on 12/27/2007, -1/+4Ya gotta love the cat with that lamp collar. That's gotta make eating quite a challenge. If nothing else, it'll force him to eat less or get darned creative. lol.
- asdfrewq, on 12/27/2007, -0/+3 I get about 5,420,000 results. Not so weird, though... Probably means you have safe search or some other filtering on in your search options. Google also takes into account your personal search history and geological location when returning results, so everyone will tend to get different numbers.
- aladrin, on 12/27/2007, -1/+4Chalk it up to just another failure.
- revansii, on 12/27/2007, -1/+4I can submit google search results as well.
http://tinyurl.com/2rzjqy - woohhaa, on 12/27/2007, -1/+3I just tried to pay my Comcast bill online. The attempt failed.
- phre3k187, on 12/27/2007, -1/+3simple and effective... dugg
- Maddoktor2, on 12/27/2007, -0/+2He's sad because there was no burger... :-(
- Unclekoolaid, on 12/27/2007, -1/+3How about over 9,000?!
- Chirp08, on 12/27/2007, -1/+2what is this "google" you speak of?
- drumbum360, on 12/27/2007, -0/+1I choose not to dig negative comments or ones I don't agree with but I do give thumbs up to ones that I especially like.
- Tophillious, on 12/27/2007, -0/+1Yep, I believe people have the right to their own opinion, but I guess 95% of diggers don't care about that. For example, I made a comment on how I didn't enjoy the drums in rockband and preferred Guitar Hero, and people flipped out :O
- Ericn84, on 12/27/2007, -0/+1Yea, that wasn't very good to pull up on my work computer=)
- gr3yn3t, on 12/27/2007, -1/+2Just like 'the office' with Dwight K Schrute.
- cannarymburns, on 12/27/2007, -0/+1I didn't know fish swallowing fish or a camera aimed at the back of a monitor is inappropriate, but thanks google, I now know the error of my ways.
- wrestlingnrj, on 12/27/2007, -0/+1Good old Ch7 news in LA.
- Vindicoth, on 12/27/2007, -1/+1Way to fail #4,100,001: Linking to google images and having the same 1000 images repeat 4.1 million times
- Rozenrot, on 12/27/2007, -3/+3Digg reached a new low. Maybe if I submit an article on "How to find ANYTHING" and just link it to www.google.com, I too can get 200+ diggs and on the front page.
THANKS DIGG! - Dylson, on 12/27/2007, -1/+1Chalk.
- scottfarner, on 12/27/2007, -2/+2Buried for LAME! If you need to search google images for "LAME" (2,980,000 of them), then here you go: http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=e ...
- 2000, on 12/27/2007, -1/+1Why do you have safesearch OFF at work?
- kalleanka, on 12/27/2007, -1/+14.6 million if you use their data centers accessible from Sweden
- nathanstarr, on 12/27/2007, -1/+1I have an archive of about 140 FAIL pictures that I was going to upload and post them on Digg. Too much time on Fark..........
- fwc67, on 12/27/2007, -1/+1they only show 1000 :(
http://images.google.com/images?q=fail&ndsp=20&svn ... - codehkr77, on 12/27/2007, -2/+2inaccurate count... images repeat
- discopete, on 12/27/2007, -2/+1i like this one:
http://www.lafferty.ca/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ ... - afidler, on 12/27/2007, -3/+2i guess this is a demo of the new image search feature on google?
wow, just wow. - NavS, on 12/27/2007, -2/+1weird... I'm getting: Results 1 - 21 of about 5,100,000 for fail
- theskyman, on 12/27/2007, -3/+2Funny!
- inactive, on 12/27/2007, -5/+4I can't believe I've never seen Cheese Cat.
http://www.lafferty.ca/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ ... - MoistVonLipwig, on 12/27/2007, -2/+0What the fk is this Intel sponsoring crap on the right? Besides its buried for lameness since the fun ends on the second page.
- MoistVonLipwig, on 12/27/2007, -2/+0What the ***** is that intel sponsoring digg ***** on the right?
- inactive, on 12/27/2007, -3/+0When I go to page 4 and click next at the bottom it takes me back to page one. This happen for anyone else?
- NavS, on 12/27/2007, -9/+4don't you mean 5.1?
- luke16, on 12/27/2007, -16/+5fixed http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=boobs&gbv= ...



What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official