Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
125 Comments
- kiiwii, on 09/29/2008, -18/+129Digg pepelu12's comment if you like hot guys.
(Quite the conundrum now, isn't it) - VII7, on 09/29/2008, -0/+57only takes about 5 mins to load each pic, nice.
- inactive, on 09/29/2008, -2/+49O RLY?
I DON'T RESPOND WELL TO TERRORISM - inactive, on 09/29/2008, -0/+41I SHALL BURY BOTH!
- digitaldivinci, on 09/29/2008, -1/+38Honestly, this gallery is pretty average
- CCB0x45, on 09/29/2008, -0/+34You have got to be kidding me with the page reloads on this terrible site.
Edit: and the pictures are so ***** tiny. 60 well choreographed diggs to the front page. - inactive, on 09/29/2008, -0/+28Dugg for the topless - err - body-painted lass...
- pastasauce, on 09/29/2008, -2/+30Buried for being in a slideshow format.
- homesickalien, on 09/29/2008, -1/+26Buried for mediocre looking women dressed like the redneck attention whores they are. Not news or entertainment.
- malex, on 09/29/2008, -0/+23I'm underwhelmed.
- davidg11, on 09/29/2008, -1/+22Cool, the slowest ass slideshow ever just hit Digg's front page.
- inactive, on 09/29/2008, -0/+19Very SFW.
Not even worth your time. - brentinkc, on 09/29/2008, -2/+21Sick of slideshows! ***** you! Buried!
- stayhumble, on 09/29/2008, -0/+17reminds me of what it was like to look at hot chicks when 28.8k came out
- mywhitenoise, on 09/29/2008, -5/+21Oh my god, hot chicks on the internet!
I never thought I'd see the day! - a1cd, on 09/29/2008, -0/+16An upside of the market crash is that people will only be able to afford a small amount of clothing.
- petemcfraser, on 09/29/2008, -0/+14See, now that's much more useful information.
- irfanmp, on 09/29/2008, -3/+15I dugg up pepelu12 and then undugg him after I read yours. I have now dugg yours instead.
- mi6bomb, on 09/29/2008, -0/+11Definitely saw a few of the body paint girls there, made me do a double take.
- Frodoholic, on 09/29/2008, -0/+11Sigh. Losing faith in digg...
- Raptor007, on 09/29/2008, -0/+11Then I'm glad they haven't, if it keeps you in pants.
- mywhitenoise, on 09/29/2008, -0/+10Their hair doesn't look "wild".
- HappyDonut, on 09/29/2008, -0/+8Load ....
LOAD FFS.
...
sigh.. - Projektorboy, on 09/29/2008, -3/+11So the only way to digg his comment up is if you're bisexual?
- joshefosho, on 09/29/2008, -2/+9To bad all the bands that played suck.
- str3ama, on 09/29/2008, -1/+8I call shenanigans on this submission, philostrato submitted a very similar article (http://digg.com/music/Ever_Gone_to_a_Summer_Music_ ... that made the frontpage. The thing to notice is that both sites seem to be owned by the same publication/organization/person? Similar design, same platform, similar structure, clearly diggbait.
http://houstonpress.com/slideshow/view/87034
http://phoenixnewtimes.com/slideshow/view/153004 - sprooj, on 09/29/2008, -0/+7Who wears pants these days anyway?
- gasin, on 09/29/2008, -1/+8SFW? NSFW?
Can someone help :( - y2kery, on 09/29/2008, -0/+6More chick should defiantly wear body paint. Clothes are overrated.
- spmyke, on 09/30/2008, -0/+5What a ***** website.
- mradultman, on 09/30/2008, -0/+5I'm not even whelmed
- itoremymind, on 09/29/2008, -0/+5Not I.
- NotYourProdigy, on 09/30/2008, -0/+5I used to live in Tempe, and frequented Phoenix and Scottsdale. I now live in Denver. The differences in the girls are outstanding! Move to Arizona, and avoid Colorado if you like women!
- tallguyg, on 09/30/2008, -1/+5slowest. slideshow. ever.
BURIED - haydesigner, on 09/30/2008, -1/+5So... who do you like then?
- BradBrown, on 09/29/2008, -0/+4Can someone please create a single-page "best of" compilation for ease of masturbation? I can't stand this "next..next...next" crap.
- scoottie, on 09/29/2008, -1/+5I guess you can say those girls have wild hair if you live in phoenix but i see girls with a lot "wilder" hairstyles in los angeles
- sprooj, on 09/29/2008, -0/+4Your comment sucked on so many levels.
- davidg11, on 09/29/2008, -0/+4The girls aren't hot and the pics take at least 20 min to load.
So Awesome.
Please....please submit more of these. - teddyrux, on 09/29/2008, -1/+5This site has the corniest captions I've ever read.
- feliks2, on 09/30/2008, -0/+3Not even. Not close.
- phre3k187, on 09/30/2008, -0/+3"the Internet King. I wonder if he can provide faster nudity."
- DeadNed, on 09/30/2008, -0/+3Pennsylvania amish here. god bless those heathen women and their vile, sinful ways.
- CCB0x45, on 09/30/2008, -1/+4Because every ***** image is a page reload loading all that extra crap, and when the page reloads every time for an image, it is ridiculous. Even ajax slideshows are stupid because they slower than just scrolling down a page, yes I would like 50 images on the same page, its much better. The only reason they do a ***** slide show is to get more CPM.
- inactive, on 09/30/2008, -0/+3uh... wtf at pic 11. At least they are not anorexic like half the girls out there.
- sprooj, on 09/29/2008, -0/+3Since when have oversized glasses and fake ***** made any chick special in the last 2 years?
- lanismycousin, on 09/29/2008, -0/+3diggbait =(
- Ceaser57, on 09/30/2008, -0/+3I know we all like to look at hot girls but seriously
***** PHOENIXNEWTIMES
this slideshow is nothing but spam, and personally I don't think they deserve this ad revenue - PGPirate, on 09/29/2008, -1/+4Mom?!
-
Show 51 - 100 of 131 discussions




What is Digg?