digg

Join DiggAbout

The First Real Incredible Hulk Trailer watch!

mtv.com — I don't know what to think of it...

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • ssn697, on 03/13/2008, -10/+100pretty good trailer. Not Iron Man good, but pretty good.
    • MrStabby, on 03/13/2008, -7/+18I must say, Liv Tyler as Betty Ross = Win

      But Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Potts = Epic Win
    • Sawta, on 03/13/2008, -19/+3Weird, you're comment makes it sound as if both those movies would to be enjoyable to see..
    • Mist0r_Wiggles, on 03/13/2008, -1/+10A bit sad that Eric Bana left the role, but Norton is a damn good actor and fits the part too. Yeah, but I'm confused on the story a bit, so does this continue the Ang Lee version or is it a fresh start. Sorry if I'm not up to date with "The Hulk"
      • badjoke, on 03/13/2008, -3/+19It's a fresh start. It's easiest just to forget the Ang Lee version completely.
        • pixelate, on 03/13/2008, -1/+82They figured you wouldn't like him when he's Ang Lee
        • namelessXsilent, on 03/13/2008, -3/+1If i could only digg you multiple times..
      • christianw, on 03/13/2008, -15/+3this looks movie looks really stupid and cliche'. after iron man and dark knight, i think hollywood needs to lay off super hero movies for like a decade, were all sick of this *****. give us original stories again. if comics were THIS successful ***** artists wouldnt be so god damn poor all the time.


        comics are just an excuse now for hollywood to be lazy.
        • catfish182, on 03/13/2008, -3/+1well at least they are not making a sequel to 'the lost boys' or something really silly like that.

          o wait.
          Damn you are right
      • raynar, on 03/13/2008, -4/+2looks better than the first one...My question is, do the hulk(s) all have stretchy pants? I dont want to see green dong flopping around, but its kind of funny how thats the only clothing that doesnt rip...
        • Strunt, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2It's just one of those leap of faith things you have to do with superhero films like Clark Kent's disguise and Spiderman's ears disappearing when he puts his mask on, oh, and the general bloody implausibility of any of it.
          What gets me, is they're remaking a film less than 5 years after the previous one! -can this stop, before all we have to watch is the 15th remake of Superman 3?
      • chocolatetacos, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2True story: Edward Norton only makes good movies.
    • canadaboy, on 03/13/2008, -7/+23Unless you don't live in the US, then it sucks because they don't stream it outside the US.
      • monkeyboyhero, on 03/13/2008, -2/+4Strange - I'm in Japan and watched it just fine.
      • Markpdotcom, on 03/13/2008, -0/+16I don't know why you're getting dugg down canadaboy, I have the same problem here in the UK
        • Wartyboskfapped, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2Fine in the Southern Hemisphere.
        • Septimus, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1UK'er, but out in Andorra and it played fine/
      • shegs, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1I watched it fine in korea
      • BarneyXP, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3I'm in Canada I just viewed it without issue by clicking watch this in HD. :)
      • lintmonkey, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1Hey! Let's reverse engineer MTV's licensing restrictions!
      • themastersb, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3I'm really starting to get tired of videos saying "This can't be played in your Country" or something similar. The Internet is supposed to be free and open and besides i's not like I'm living in Kazakhstan or something like that. I mean WTF?
    • norman619, on 03/13/2008, -11/+8Are you kidding? The Hulk CG looks like crap. The thing looks like a game trailer not a movie trailer. This should have remained a direct to DVD release.
      • mmortal03, on 03/13/2008, -4/+1His head looks too small for his body.
      • incredibilistic, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2I agree. The nemesis looks even worse. It's like the franchise is getting the Joel Schumacher treatment with corny story arcs and over-the-top action scenes. The first Hulk looks WAY better than this one. We all know it's CG but why does it have to look so CG-ish? As for EdNor taking the role, well, this movie won't land in him better roles in the future so my guess is that after his flops he'll move onto an indie drama or back to broadway for few months to get that summer blockbuster taste out of his mouth.

        It still has the potential to open at number one (probably because there won't be any other big movies opening that same day) but after that it will drop into man's land and be on DVD/Blu-ray 8 weeks later.
    • Indryd, on 03/13/2008, -0/+13Direct Download HD version:
      http://a123.g.akamai.net/7/123/22372/v0001/asmstor ...
    • BoneheadFarker, on 03/13/2008, -1/+3Yeah...great video. I especially liked the part where it said that copyrights restricts them from playing the video outside the US. I was completely enthralled...
    • speedyrev, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1After the last flop, I was hoping the CG would look better. It looks like they just cut and paste the last hulk into a new story line.
    • jstohler, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2No significant improvement in CG + same lame story + new "bad guy" = fail
    • dariendynamite, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Toronto is show all over this trailer, especially in the final fight scene.
      They shut down Yonge street for a number of days in the summer to film this, it was a really big deal.
      The plot looks a little dumb
    • happycat, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2I dunno, it looks like the movie will be 90 minutes of dialog and character development, followed by a 10 minute action packed finale where the Hulk "saves the day". Please, all we want is a movie filled with "HULK SMASH!"
      • ssn697, on 03/14/2008, -0/+1According to the Director, the final fight scene is TWENTY SIX minutes long, and Norton turns into the Hulk 3 minutes into the movie. He said they don't feel the need to develop the back story...
  • akerlund, on 03/13/2008, -26/+12Looks like a video game
    • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -7/+14No CG movie would be complete without a comment like that from someone ignorant about CG.
      • badjoke, on 03/13/2008, -1/+13To be honest, the CG doesn't really look as good as it should.
        • christianw, on 03/13/2008, -2/+3cg in the first one looks WAY better
        • theaceoffire, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1You have been spoiled by 360 and PS3.
      • TrevorBelmont, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3So tell us in what way this person's comment is "ignorant"? What piece of knowledge do you have that makes this look more real to you?
        • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1It may not look 100% real, but it certainly looks much better than video game graphics. And I'm a professional CG artist...so...
    • solid12345, on 03/13/2008, -3/+2***** the plot looks like a videogame. Want to know why Ang Lee's Hulk failed? Because stupid teenagers can't wrap their minds around a movie whose plot involves something more than "Hulk Smash!"
      • fasda, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1And Ang Lee couldn't wrap his mind around the fact that for the most part the Hulk is "Hulk Smash" most of the depth of the character is in Bruce Banner not the Hulk
    • 5urr3al5am, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2not sure thats going to be good, let's keep our hopes up though. check out that 'step brothers' clip.. looks awesome!
  • fiskintl, on 03/13/2008, -4/+224100 dollars says they punch eachother in the end...
    • ghee, on 03/13/2008, -1/+55They were clearly going to start dancing.
    • kamakazi17, on 03/13/2008, -3/+10i thought they were going to kiss each other ::shrug::
      • surKaz, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1man, ... You REALLY like your comics, don't ya?
    • MrStabby, on 03/13/2008, -1/+132SPOILER ALERT:

      Bruce Banner is actually Tyler Durden
      • Dundasbro, on 03/13/2008, -3/+1Does Snape kill BruceTyler? Cos that would be a pretty huge spoiler, like (spoiler)^2 or something...
      • nighthawk8713, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2Rule number one of spoilers: you don't talk about spoilers.
    • fxu1989, on 03/13/2008, -5/+27100 dollars can talk now ?
      • incredibilistic, on 03/13/2008, -3/+1That was awesome. Two big green thumbs up.
    • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -11/+6I think they are going to have gay butt secks. Green style.
    • JosefH, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4The Hulk has no genitalia, duh. Just two Y chromosomes.
      • TheLastFreeMan, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6He has another fist where his genitalia should be.
    • GibitStylin, on 03/13/2008, -2/+3Ok sir, i will take that bet, and up you 1 whole dollar.
    • MuffinPatrol, on 03/13/2008, -1/+3I hope it ends like Rocky II
    • albatross5000, on 03/14/2008, -6/+2205 diggs on "they'll punch each other in the end"? .... who are you people? : (
      • fiskintl, on 03/15/2008, -0/+1people who didn't get buried...like you.
  • HanukahGuy, on 03/13/2008, -3/+111You wouldn't like me when I'm cartoony!
    • FTLJohnson, on 03/13/2008, -2/+34Hey, it could be worse in reverse... Ya know... They could be making... I dunno... say... live action Dragon Ball Z...

      Oh....
      • surKaz, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2yes... Realize that, Johnson.. DBZ.. is ...going to kick.....ass??... Not so sure anymore..
    • albatross5000, on 03/14/2008, -3/+1.... 98 digs... but how?
  • bnitro, on 03/13/2008, -5/+90Not epic but looks awesome im still stunned that we are actually getting a Hulk film so soon after Ang's bomb.
    • MaTT2011, on 03/13/2008, -10/+17I'll say it: Angs version f***ing rocked the house IMO. Great use of stylized camera angles and frames. Sure, short on action long on blah but overall i think we could have ended up with something much worse.....hell we might just end up with something worse if the whole Ed norton thing doesnt work out. I hope it will be great but these things are beyond our control.

      I'll take Angs HULK over spiderman 3 anyday........f***ing dancing *****.
      • shegs, on 03/13/2008, -6/+4I half agree with you I liked the first one until his dad became the bad guy... and I have yet to watch a movie of ed's that I didn't like.

        /agree spider 3 was epic fail
    • SirSwirly, on 03/13/2008, -1/+4Ang's version *did* rock the f***ing house. Quite possibly one of the 10 most underrated films ev-ar.
  • supertaliman, on 03/13/2008, -4/+14Looks sweet, but the effects need to be cleaned up a bit
    • onlynameicanget, on 03/13/2008, -0/+12On level 3?
    • Dorepoll, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1They did for Iron Man (compare the new trailer and the old superbowl bit -- huge difference), so I don't think a CG cleanup is out of the question.
    • hoogie, on 03/14/2008, -0/+1We'll tighten up the graphics for you while we're at it.
  • jo88, on 03/13/2008, -1/+146here's a link for folks outside of the us:
    http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/03/12/must-watch- ...
  • DeviateSeptum, on 03/13/2008, -8/+41That was the crappest media player ever. Nothing like seeing 5 seconds of video followed by 15 seconds of buffering. And you can't rewind without rebuffering. WTH?
    • jmg703, on 03/13/2008, -8/+6go cry to the internet gods
      • JosefH, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1The internet gods' site is down. Durr.
    • smashhell, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6Give memories to the good old Stage6 days doesn't it. =(
    • numetheus, on 03/13/2008, -10/+2Maybe you should get something better than dialup or stop stealing wifi that lots of other people are stealing also. Loaded up first time with absolutely no problems.
    • bosssmiley, on 03/13/2008, -0/+9Fail for "US only" copyright *****. What's the good of putting something on the internet if 195 countries in the world can't see it?
    • diskit, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1http://incrediblehulk.marvel.com/
  • methlp, on 03/13/2008, -7/+28There's one over on spike that has HD links:

    http://digg.com/movies/The_Incredible_Hulk_Trailer ...
    • lostcause, on 03/13/2008, -2/+141. There IS an HD link on that page.
      2. Don't link to your Digg submission, just the page.
    • Lust4Me, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1The MTV link claims it won't work outside the U.S. for copyright reasons :
  • ggryzik, on 03/13/2008, -11/+2absolutely ballin
    • badjoke, on 03/13/2008, -1/+8Let's not ever use that verb again.
      • TrevorBelmont, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3Let's not call an adjective a verb ever again.
  • IanPatterson, on 03/13/2008, -2/+29Filmed in Toronto?

    I see the Sam the Record Man sign right at the end of the trailer...
    • offput, on 03/13/2008, -0/+9There was also Zanzibar, and awesome strip joint nearby Sam the Record Man. Not that I've ever been. I'm a Brass Rail man myself.
      • Claude1971, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3yeah, the Zanzibar lost it's appeal when they stopped using the swings. At least they still have the shower on stage. They do right?please
    • tetujin, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2yes, it was filmed in toronto (among other places). :)
    • oldno7brand, on 03/13/2008, -0/+9Woot Toronto! I definitely saw them filming. They did a scene inside of Knox Hall and Convocation Hall on the U of T campus too. The trailers were parked down Devonshire Pl for months in the fall.
      • Zidul, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3One of those street scenes is filmed in Hamilton. they had fake buildings built, lots of military cars and stuff destroyed and piled up..
    • jjremy, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1And Hamilton as well!
    • thwackitechnica, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3The filmed for about 2-3 weeks, if I recall correctly. At night, for a while, they'd shut down Young street. I work near there.

      Not relevant, but cool: when Zanzibar renovated their kitchen, we supplied their food.
    • loconet, on 03/14/2008, -0/+2...yet, we can't watch the trailer from Canada...
    • JimmyDelicious, on 03/14/2008, -0/+1Way out there, but check out this trailer. The film stars the guy who is the stand-in for General Ross in the new Hulk Flick! http://www.vimeo.com/653847
  • AshamedAmerican, on 03/13/2008, -15/+64Meh.
    • PRlME, on 03/13/2008, -15/+4on your avatar, is that the Nazi sticker on the U.S. flag?
      I just look at your profile, and it is allow me to give you a good old New York ***** YOU!
    • inverselogic, on 03/13/2008, -7/+1what he said..
  • ucdbunny, on 03/13/2008, -31/+4wow another sequel to another subpar movie...glad hollywood's got the creative juices flowing
    • MrStabby, on 03/13/2008, -1/+13Yea...you're about to get buried into oblivion...
      Take a copy of Ang Lee's Hulk with you, and decide for yourself whether this is a "sequel" or not...
    • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -0/+12Not Sequel. Franchise Reboot FTW!
      • mattcoady, on 03/13/2008, -1/+3It's like the producers threw their hands in the air "Do-Over!"
    • bagboyrebel, on 03/13/2008, -2/+9hooray for ignorant comments!
  • jer.williams, on 03/13/2008, -8/+89I'm excited about the Ed Norton part, but the CG looks whack.
    • Sawta, on 03/13/2008, -11/+2I agree with one half of that statement, and I'll give you a hint..it isn't the first.
      • Syric, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1So you don't think jer.williams is excited about Ed Norton?
    • Charlotte_Web, on 03/13/2008, -2/+1I dunno... Norton looked like he had a sly grin on his face while talking about his "problem".
    • supertaliman, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1These are not finished shots, the cg is not complete
      • SpectralWolf, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1I hope so. The CG looked kinda bad in this trailer.
  • DJSPin047, on 03/13/2008, -2/+111HULK SMASH EXPECTATIONS
    • TheBuz, on 03/13/2008, -3/+1Dugg.
    • xxMorrissey, on 03/13/2008, -1/+7Dugg for the lulz
    • MightyLime, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2It didn't actually, but that comment deserves a digg regardless.
    • Black6x, on 03/13/2008, -2/+0I actually passed this, and then came up just to digg it.
  • PRlME, on 03/13/2008, -5/+44i want to see
    Hulk Vs Zangief
  • kinerry, on 03/13/2008, -3/+24Maybe they'll get it right this time
    • Sawta, on 03/13/2008, -1/+6Or MORE wrong, for that extra bitter after taste that you get in your mouth when you realize you're watching drivel.
  • moisture, on 03/13/2008, -3/+18imagine making a movie from a comic book! delightful!
  • landosystem, on 03/13/2008, -7/+10cleaned the ang lee out of my mouth!
    • T440, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6eww
      • InitialDMP5, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3what did you watch to get the ang lee out of your ass?
    • slicky803, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5So just to clarify, Ang Lee was in your mouth?
      • landosystem, on 03/15/2008, -0/+1I won't say in or not, but I'd say on or around the mouth area.
  • AdamaObama, on 03/13/2008, -7/+36I liked the Ang Lee version (enjoyed the cinematography lots), but I'm really excited to see this. It looks like they're focusing more on Bruce Banner than the Hulk. That's cool with me.
    • jordanmerle, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6Hopefully they stay away from the multiple angles in different boxes a la 24. It was pretty distracting to the story. I can't remember correctly but in the original film didn't it take around and hour before Banner became the Hulk?
      • vainbrian, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6i love those multibox views. beter than the usual montage, it almost feel like reading comic books in motion minus the texts.
      • KarthVader, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2I actually liked the The Hulk (Ang Lee movie). It set up the story for at least one sequel. I think Lee really picked up on the emotional turmoil involved with the Hulk. I'm still pretty excited to see what Ed Norton can do with this movie and this character, but I will always appreciate Ang Lee's version.
    • Lasereth, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4I also liked the Ang Lee version. The multiple angle thing could have been taken out but the actual Hulk scenes where he's fighting and running and smashing were simply awesome.
  • iperalta, on 03/13/2008, -5/+7and now i have some excitement for this movie...
  • BobaFettTDG, on 03/13/2008, -10/+5Dude, this is gonna be so awesome.
    • mverta, on 03/13/2008, -7/+2Dudes who like to pretend they're Boba Fett on the internet think this movie looks awesome.
  • peestandingup, on 03/13/2008, -7/+52There's just something about The Incredible Hulk in CGI that doesn't work.

    The best superheros in movies are the ones that are more "real" (Batman, Spiderman, etc).
    • jordanmerle, on 03/13/2008, -1/+29You are right, they should just paint barry bounds green. I believe he has the same hat size as the Hulk.
    • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -1/+44Because there's no CGI in the Spiderman movies...
      • DustinHill, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Thank you...
      • peestandingup, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Yes, but Spiderman himself isn't ALWAYS in CGI. If the Hulk's on screen, you can bet your ass he's gonna be in CGI.
    • ariez84, on 03/13/2008, -2/+4And im sure some guy in green paint is the perfect hulk.
      • mattcoady, on 03/13/2008, -0/+13I've got the perfect actor to play the part... Lou Ferrigno.
    • Tyrghast, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5You do know all of the stunts in spiderman are CG and the closeups of the 'webslinging while carrying people' are normally giant dolls on a tether, right? Watch the extras on the DVD man, completely ruins the movie!
      • KaiUno, on 03/13/2008, -8/+2I really don't need to see the extras to ruin those 3 movies. They flat out of suck. Tobey Maguire as Spiderman? Come on.
        • spudnic, on 03/13/2008, -1/+6first one is still great, and Doc Oc was awesome enough to make up for anything in the second.
          Third though, that was awful.
          • jordanmerle, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Doc Oc was a great villain but the dude could have used an undershirt.
            With holes cut out for his tentacles of course.
    • Lochie, on 03/13/2008, -0/+25Or they could just tape a bunch of cats together.
      • SurrealDream, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6It sounds like such a cliche, but I spat my drink all over my monitor...you *****.
    • provost, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1bring back lou ferigno. I just saw a VH-1 special on him. Did you know he's deaf?
      I dunno.. I just find it hard to take him seriously anymore.
      (american dad reference for those who need it explained)
  • dustindame, on 03/13/2008, -14/+50WOW. that blew ass.
    • KingGorilla, on 03/13/2008, -1/+12I'm not sure if that was a good thing or bad, which is exactly how I feel about this trailer
  • fxu1989, on 03/13/2008, -6/+12I just hope this movie is better than the last terrible Hulk Movie ...
    • gbro, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2I feel sorry for Eric Bana.
    • projjalc, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1You mean the last "incredible Hulk" movie, ri-- oh, now I get what you're saying.
  • jordanmerle, on 03/13/2008, -0/+107Where does the Hulk shop for his magic jeans that can go from a size 32 to a size 300 waist?
    • TheShom, on 03/13/2008, -0/+33The GAP.
      Get It?
    • PixelMagic, on 03/13/2008, -0/+9Lane Bryant.
    • TwwIX, on 03/13/2008, -0/+7Jarrett from the Subway commercials lend him a pair.
    • CTK14A, on 03/13/2008, -0/+13Elastic waistbands, my friend. For when you're fat AND frugal.
    • jmg703, on 03/13/2008, -4/+4Do you really want to see Hulk's penis? Hmm... maybe. Wouldn't it be great if his penis stayed the same size and shape.
      • Zidul, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5Umm, Bruce is a scientist? he invented jeans that stretch long before he was the hulk.
      • roomforpanic, on 03/13/2008, -0/+11You think about penises a lot?
    • cryonix, on 03/13/2008, -5/+65wow, seriously? its a movie about a guy who survived a massive dose of gamma radiation, who also when hes angry transforms into a giant green juggernaut... and you're questioning the physics of his pants?
    • Claude1971, on 03/13/2008, -1/+7I think he shops at the same store as Oprah
    • bossm4n, on 03/13/2008, -1/+4Anywhere he wants.
    • dmax801, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Sans-a-Belt
    • PenguinShogun, on 03/13/2008, -1/+1when he turns into the hulk it's like when one is on steroids, certain things grow and others shrink,
  • mverta, on 03/13/2008, -12/+4Fail.
    • jmg703, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2wtg you know internet logo. Copy paste your life away.
  • silentsirens, on 03/13/2008, -4/+8Dugg for Arwen er, Liv.
  • CookieTrain, on 03/13/2008, -21/+15Copyright restrict us from playing this video outside the us.
    This is ***** *****, please bury this RIAA ridden crap.
    • Kallius, on 03/13/2008, -2/+32Filmed in Toronto but can't watch the trailer in Canada. ***** THE MPAA! Buried for EPIC FAILURE
    • jmg703, on 03/13/2008, -1/+10Maybe if the RIAA had absolutely anything to do with FILM rights then you wouldn't have been dugg down for ignorance. You blame the RIAA for your ass pimples too?
      • WallnutBoy, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3I do. ***** RIAA and their curséd Arse-Pimple shenanigans.
  • TheShom, on 03/13/2008, -3/+19I think this one's better than the last. Edward Norton's a pretty good actor, and i heard he did the screenplay for the flick too. It seems that unexpected guys (him and Downey jr.) may give us something worth watching again in superhero movies
    • shotgunefx, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4From what I read, it was Zak Penn, Norton did some edits and took all the credit. I don't know why I know this, I don't even know who the hell Zak Penn is outside of this one random fact.
      • TheMariner, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1You're right, this was mentioned at Comic-Con last year I believe.
    • gnslngr1919, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Ed Norton, as a person, is an asshole. Listen to his commentary on Fight Club for evidence.
    • Syric, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Downey Jr. was unexpected? You get a raging addict, kind of a dick sometimes, (who's a good actor) to play a raging addict, kind of a dick sometimes, (who's a superhero).
    • tmyprod, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Though if Christian Bale had done it, he would have bulked up to play the hulk parts himself.

      but Ed Norton = awesome.
  • Netik09, on 03/13/2008, -3/+10I'm surprised someone had the nads to fund this after the last miserable one.
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/13/2008, -2/+10nobody did. Marvel funded it. They are starting to make their own movies. Iron is the first, and now the Incredible Hulk. Marvel picked Downey and Favreu, and I believe working with Ed Norton was their choice as well. If the Iron man trailers are any indication, Marvel will start doing these movies how they should be made. Spiderman 3 destroyed that series. Its a shame they took Venom with it.
    • cozinator, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2With the biggest domestic opening weekend of all time, and $900 million worldwide, I doubt Marvel's complaining about how Spiderman 3 "destroyed the series".
  • latpack, on 03/13/2008, -3/+5Looks like it could either be fantasically awesome, or a giant green turd. Think about it. A monster movie (what this basically is) where only for certain periods of time the monsters appear? Hrm.. Hulk could have 15 minutes of screen time for all we know.
  • WhistlinTom, on 03/13/2008, -7/+1I can haz smash. Exploding high five.
  • xer0five, on 03/13/2008, -5/+42Dugg for Edward Norton
    • solidus636, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Yeah, the man did a HELL of a job in American History X, and I'm sure he'll do great in this role.
    • alex1015, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Definately my favorite actor. He's played so many different types of roles and I think he's been good in so many of them. Too often actors just play about one type of character. Ahem Michael Ceera
    • padrebuf, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1dugg for Tim Roth
      • cheetosfan, on 03/13/2008, -0/+0dugg your comment for digging for tim roth.

        have you ever seen "everyone says i love you". it's a woody allen musical that i just saw recently and tim roth is in it (and sings). excellent film. very funny
    • MRintheKeys, on 03/13/2008, -0/+0He's great as the bellhop in Four Rooms
  • dikaiosyne, on 03/13/2008, -4/+6so, not Hulk II, just a remake?
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/13/2008, -0/+16yes. More like Hulk Begins.
    • DarKnight90, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3It's not a remake or a sequel. It's just a new stand alone movie.
  • nutniqs, on 03/13/2008, -8/+12Can someone explain to me why the ***** they are making this movie? It's only like 5 years ago there was one exactly like this made? HULK SMASH! CGI SMASH! this is one bizarre sequel/re-envisioning maneuver if I've ever seen one. Hollywood really IS out of ideas, ugh.
    • richlw, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2simply because a lot of people, both either verbally or with their wallets gave the finger to Ang Lee's Incredible Hulk. Good ole Stan Lee probably wagered, he could save The Hulk, by getting a better director (namely an American one who actually probably read the comic), and a better actor (No doubt Edward Norton rocks), and a better storyline (Abomination looks awesome from the trailer, and it's not this unbelievable story with Bruce's dad crap). So there you have it, hope that explains it hehe
  • headzoo, on 03/13/2008, -10/+4God I hate computer generated graphics. A guy dressed up in a big green suit still looks better to me than something created in a computer.
    • bagboyrebel, on 03/13/2008, -2/+8I hate when people say things like that. Neither one looks realistic, so why do you like makeup better than CG? Is it because CG is newer and therefore bad?
      • headzoo, on 03/13/2008, -1/+6No, it's because the CG just seems more distracting to me. I understand what you're saying though. A bad costume is just as distracting. In the end though, a bad Yoda puppet that was filmed 30 years ago, still looks better than a CG Yoda (as an example).
        • JosefH, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6Yoda puppet couldn't flip off walls while flailing a lightsaber, could he? I didn't think so.
        • Syric, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3First of all, it wasn't a bad Yoda puppet. It was a very excellent high-tech Yoda puppet.

          Second... this is just me, but: when I see CG, I go "okay, CG". When I see makeup, I go "wtf, another dumbass wearing makeup".
  • mateo76, on 03/13/2008, -10/+0much better quality version here.. plus 3 hd quicktimes

    http://digg.com/movies/The_Incredible_Hulk_Trailer

  • grayghst83, on 03/13/2008, -2/+7more important than the incredible hulk trailer was the lost boys: the tribe trailer that follows if you keep watching...
    • idesign562, on 03/13/2008, -1/+2i was waiting for a Keifer cameo.
    • tbranch227, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2LOL....so sad! Why ruin Lost Boys? The first one was great.
      • cphelps, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Agreed, this will be another disappointing sequel. I think Feldman just needed money.
  • urbandistrict, on 03/13/2008, -1/+9This had the makings of a great movie when Norton signed on......sadly the trailer confirms my fears that it would be the same ol' churned-out Hollywood *****. Comic adaptations are the prefect medium for a movie to blend artistic vision with blockbuster effects, yet they always cop-out for the lowest denominator with no attention to the details. Even on the CG side of production. ILM did an awesome job with the first Hulk. I think they deviated a little off path.
    Hulk, Marvel comics' world recognized character directed by who? Great going.
    • bagboyrebel, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3Could you please explain what a good Hulk movie would be like? or what specifically was bad about the trailer?
      • scififan9009, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6There are a zillion potential good movies in his bio alone:

        http://www.marvel.com/universe/Hulk

        The trailer looks like a retread of the tired 1970's TV show. The street level fight looks fake. And they gave the main villain away in the first trailer, wtf?

        Hate it or love it, Ang Lee was true to the mythos and origin of the Hulk, and tried something new with his film. Personally I loved the first Hulk. This trailer does not look like anything new.
        • Jeez, on 03/13/2008, -0/+0You do realise you also saw the vill in Iron man trailor? Every trailor these days gives away the vill you point being? Otherwise people will while about not seeing it till the end like they did with cloverfield
  • birkoph, on 03/13/2008, -3/+8LOL. Last scene is from Downtown Toronto, and Zanzabars is a strip club.

    Also that last scene looked very similar to that of Neo and Agent Smith in teh 3rd matrix movie.
    • markstory, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Totally in toronto. I remember seeing them setting up those scenes. On yonge and gerrard.
  • cozzab, on 03/13/2008, -2/+27does anyone else think that it looks like the hulk was fighting a berserker from gears of war?
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5Its Abomination. But there is a likeness to that of which you speak.
      • Amadeus2490, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1My love for you is like a clock BERSERKER! Would you like to suck my ***** BERSERKER!
        • MRintheKeys, on 03/13/2008, -0/+0My mom's been *****' a dead guy for 30 years. I call him dad.
      • texpundit, on 03/13/2008, -0/+3I'm really surprised that NOBODY until now had mentioned that he was fighting the Abomination. IMO, that's much more epic than just throwing tanks around like the first one.
    • wakeb791, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1The head reminds me of a goomba from the Mario Bros movie
    • Namakemono, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Shreeeeeeeeeek!
    • Daiken, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Mario Bros. Movie (shudder). Never speak of that abomination ever again.
  • cnot3, on 03/13/2008, -2/+24I thought Ed Norton's alter ego was Tyler Durden, not the Hulk.
    • llamasnotsheep, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4Tyler SMASH!
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/13/2008, -1/+7Imagine Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt) in the role of the Hulk?! That would be insane. Making soap with the fat of the women he smashed.
    • TheBuz, on 03/13/2008, -1/+7You are not your purple khakis.
    • Fragalishus, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5I am Jack's smashing alter-ego.
    • astrotrain, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Ed Norton... Something like The Incredible Honeymooners?

      Ralph: "NORTON!... Come on down!!!"
      Ed: "Ralph...I'm sick and tired of you yelling at me!" *eyes start turning green*
      Ralph: "Norton... C'ome ol pal... come down... I da..da..didn't......"
      Ed: ** hulk like character with little hat on head and vest**
    • ronin691, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2I am Jack's paycheck generating, summer block buster.
  • cannabrain, on 03/13/2008, -5/+4Compared to Iron Man this isnt going to live up, but with Ed Norton it deffinatly should be better, even if just because of him
    • astrotrain, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Iron Man will no doubt top this Hulk re-make. I would hopefully think that people who were suckered into a two hour disaster of bringing the Hulk to the big screen will remember, and skip this version.
  • belleaux, on 03/13/2008, -8/+5Looks and sounds like *****.
    • idesign562, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2seems like the other one, just filmed in Canada instead of the U.S.
  • orlandogeek, on 03/13/2008, -0/+6Anyone else notice it seems to be similar in theme to both the 80's show as well as the Bruce Jones run on the comic.
    • scififan9009, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4Also notice the scene of him falling from the helicopter, which has to be a direct reference to the end of "The Death of the Incredible Hulk" which was made in 1990. At the end of that TV movie the Hulk died from falling out of a helicopter, which was LAME.
      • JCDenton513, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2It's probably a nod to that. Just redoing it the way it was supposed to happen.
  • isunktheship, on 03/13/2008, -2/+2Ew mtv... pepperen, are you trying to drum up some business?
  • AzMegladon, on 03/13/2008, -2/+7so one ***** fight in the whole movie?
    • Strikersgun, on 03/13/2008, -0/+0The hulk gets stronger with each punch he takes so most likely the other guy 2 and they also both immune to pain so ur 1 fight might be pretty damn long
      • LordofChaosIori, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2No one wants a pretty damn long fight... The Matrix 3 taught us that no matter how cool a fight is, it can still be too long.
  • vesendak, on 03/13/2008, -3/+4Wow they went ahead and ran with the alternative script from the last crappy adaptation. I was hoping for a little more from Edward Norton, something along the lines of a more soulful journey in the direction of what Bill Bixby did in the 80s.
    • Schwabby, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1Actually, Edward Norton wrote the screenplay for this one.
  • bradbaxter, on 03/13/2008, -3/+43Why not do with the Hulk what they did with HellBoy? He doesn't have to be CGI to be big and cool.
    • Claude1971, on 03/13/2008, -9/+3how many 8ft tall actors do you know, *****
    • OckToePoos, on 03/13/2008, -6/+1or The Thing in Fantastic Four. I thought that looked decent.
      • jjcyber, on 03/13/2008, -0/+5It looked like *****. People, you need to realize that the only way to truly render the hulk is to use cgi.
    • mparker7410, on 03/13/2008, -0/+4Yeah, just paint him green, put some torn purple pants on him and call it a day.
    • cavar, on 03/13/2008, -1/+0It could be based more on a real person but with some CGI embellishments/make up.
    • Syric, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2There's a reason Lou Ferrigno looked stupid as the Hulk, and it wasn't just his hair...
    • kuj007, on 03/13/2008, -0/+2I gotta say no, to that one... Ron Perlman is a HUGE dude, the whole thing about David/Bruce Banner is that he's mild mannered and meek, so they gotta pick a little guy to play him... slapping green makeup and some styrofoam muscles on Ed Norton would look amazingly stupid.
      • kuj007, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1and now I gotta call ***** on myself... after I posted that I started looking... Edward Norton (6'1") is actually an inch taller than Ron Perlman (6'0") (though still much slighter of build). However I still say it wouldn't work. The Hulk is supposed to be just massive (hence the name)... Hellboy is still something of human proportions even if they are large.
    • maja742, on 03/13/2008, -0/+1how about some radioactive steroids, that might achieve the same effect
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 178 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.