What is Digg?64 Comments
- IvanB, on 10/12/2007, -14/+123Jules: What does Marcellus Wallace look like?
Brett: What?
Jules: What country you from?
Brett: What?
Jules: What ain't no country I ever heard of! They speak English in What?
Brett: What?
Jules: ENGLISH, *****! DO-YOU-SPEAK-IT?
Brett: Yes!
Jules: Then you know what I'm saying!
Brett: Yes!
Jules: Describe what Marcellus Wallace looks like!
Brett: What, I-?
Jules: [pointing his gun] Say what again. SAY WHAT AGAIN. I dare you, I double dare you, *****. Say what one more goddamn time.
Brett: He's b-b-black...
Jules: Go on.
Brett: He's bald...
Jules: Does he look like a bitch?
Brett: What?
[Jules shoots Brett in shoulder]
Jules: DOES HE LOOK LIKE A BITCH?
Brett: No!
Jules: Then why you try to ***** him like a bitch, Brett?
Brett: I didn't.
Jules: Yes you did. Yes you did, Brett. You tried to ***** him. And Marcellus Wallace don't like to be ***** by anybody, except Mrs. Wallace. - cbasst, on 10/12/2007, -2/+46I'm sure the sequel will be one bad *****.
- praisethelard, on 06/06/2008, -1/+19A yellow light.
- synaesthesia, on 10/12/2007, -0/+17In the name of the Big Kahuna burger, please let this movie come to pass.
- Enchirito, on 10/12/2007, -2/+18QT talking about a possible movie he'd maybe like to do sometime in the foreseeable future? Stop the presses!
- Soniti, on 10/12/2007, -4/+17I DON'T REMEMBER ASKING YOU A GODDAMN THING!!
I use that line all the time now..
~Soniti - captainnico, on 10/12/2007, -4/+14Best line ever : Vincent -- "I shot marvin in the face."
- CzescToJa, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9This article is pointless, and has no facts. Just some fan boy who had a wet dream, and wrote about it. Here's what Tarantino is working on
# Inglorious Bastards (2008) (announced)
# Grindhouse (2007) (filming) (segment "Death Proof")
... aka Quentin Tarantino's Death Proof (USA: poster title)
... aka Robert Rodriguez's Planet Terror (USA: poster title) - jayesbee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Actually, the article said it would not be a prequel. From the article:
Madsen: Well, first he said he would do it, then he said he wasn’t going to do it. Then he called me and said, ‘You know, I’ve figured out a way to do it. It can’t be a prequel because you and John don’t look the same. It wouldn’t make sense as a sequel because you’re both dead.’ And he gave me an idea that would be really outrageous – that John and I would be the twin brothers of Vic and Vincent. We come from Amsterdam to LA to avenge the deaths of our brothers. I think that’s pretty interesting. For me, I’d love to do it. - etnu, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Who gives a ***** about the Vega twins? I want to see a new movie about Jules wandering the earth. Obviously David Carradine would make an appearance at some point.
- psyops2000, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8What's in the case? O_O
- ajb2015, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Yeah I'm still waiting on Kill Bill Vol 3. and 4. that he was thinking about after the success of the first two.
- sathias, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7I always figured it was the diamonds from Resevoir Dogs.
- BadassCheese, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6http://www.snopes.com/movies/films/pulp.htm
- unloud, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Read the ***** description.....at LEAST read the description.
- TroubleInMind, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6The mechanics are unimportant. Have you seen a Tarentino film that depended on a firm grounding in practical plot flow? They don't exist. Tarentino films depend on dialogue. Poorly written, awkward dialogue that for some reason, is extremely pleasing.
Lance: Hey, whattya think about Trudi? She ain't got a boyfriend. You wanna hang out, get high?
Vincent: Which one's Trudi? The one with all the ***** in her face?
Lance: No, that's Jody. That's my wife. - dchaosdx, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5you all are bashing the idea... but has tarentino ever led you astray?
- kigabit, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4*GASP*
A speculative article on Digg? - jgjgjg, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3doesn't sound promising
- ZenMojo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3The article said it couldn't be a prequel, but that each of them is the twin brother of another Vega. So double-twins.
Makes sense. Twins tend to run down family lines. I'm personally waiting for the Kill Bill sequel with Copperhead's baby girl grown up and being trained by Elle Driver to get revenge. Only about 11 years to go.... - Zinite, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I had always assumed it was gold bars (hence the exaggerated yellow/gold glow from the briefcase). Guess I was wrong... (sorta)...
- Araya213, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4I remember hearing about this in 2000, it was scrapped along time ago.
- Araya213, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Dude!! That really is a good idea! I'd love to see him "Just bein Jules"
- Asianwaste, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2This is just a reprise of the "Viva Las Vegas" prequel rumors.
The plot of twin sets of identical twins is a pretty big stretch. Who will they be getting revenge on? The late Mr. Orange or the got out of dodge Butch? - TroubleInMind, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2You mind if I have some of your tasty beverage to wash this down?
http://tastybeverage.ytmnd.com/ - seansshack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Would be a bad idea considering his last few movies. I think he peaked too soon!
- elsux0r, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The whole "twin brothers avenging their brothers' deaths" thing is potentially outrageously awesome or horribly lame. I'm not holding my breath on this one. A lot of Tarantino "projects" are notoriously merely ideas in his head that will never hit the celluloid.
Don't hold out for this project, just psych yourself up for Grindhouse, instead. - clownbaby, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Oh, and BTW. All of those thinking Inglorious Bastards is going to be some great, historical WW2 war film will be disappointed. It's actually a bit of a re-make of an italian WW2 flick from the 70's by the same name. It's supposed to be like all of those old campy war movies from the 60's like the dirty dozen, where eagles dare, kelly's heroes, etc.. It ain't gonna be anything like SPR or BOB.
- probeta, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Poor raped golden premise. I remember when you were just a movie...
- marcomc2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1i agree with too many people relying on making ***** ass sequels that are essentially unnecessary, but i dont think i could ever NOT enjoy a Quentin Tarantino movie set in that universe, with those actors, that dialogue, that direction, that QTness. And yes, I am a loyal QT dick sucker, because I think his ***** is perfected (since his first movie, actually). So yes, I guess he did peak too soon. But who knows, maybe he will peak again or hasnt even shown us his REAL skills..imagine. although thats bs, just kidding. all hail Pulp Fiction.
- daeyeth, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1there's no way...the plot QT is proposing still makes no sense and he admits it. he only said he'd "like" to do it. I mean cmon, twin brothers avenging their dead twin brothers? QT is reminiscing about things he's fantasizing about doing but would never actually happen.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Personally I'd hate to see this happen. Great movies should stand alone. Very few sequels actually add more to the first movie. And unless it was specifically intended to have more information to add to the story, to make it as good or better than the first film, it takes away from the first movie.
/Besides, Hollywood has become WAY too reliant on sequels these days. How about making a fresh new film, and maybe having _some_ underlying aspects that _could_ tie into the first films if the die hard fan wanted them to, but having the movie stand alone on its own merit, independent of any other movie.
Tarantino isn't washed up yet, a fresh picture from him would probably be more welcomed than a tired re-hash. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Tarantino has supposedly been working on Inglorious Bastards for 4 years... come on QT lets see this WWII epic. Lack of good WWII movies lately (haven't seen Flags of our Fathers though).
- daeyeth, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1not sure what practical plot flow has to do with an actual plot flaw. and poor written, awkward dialogue? you can't be serious...it's the exact opposite of that. even critics of QT agree that he has a brilliant writting sense and they're the foundations of his movies. and you're quote is a perfect example of that. it seems simple on the outside, but beneath it every single line carries so much character. you have a poor sense of writting if you don't understand that.
- seansshack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Kill Bill 1 was OK, 2 was crap. Basically a single story that ran too long and was split into two movies. But didn't have enough story to cover it. Compare it to Dogs and Fiction, better or worse?
Sequels would only tarnish the memory of his finest work (to date).
This was a guy that broke the rules. More tell than show in his movies, too much dialog and what happened. It worked brilliantly. Now he wants to go all Hollywood like and make sequels. - stefanovich, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1If this ends up eventually being true, i'm going back and making this story my #1.
- CzescToJa, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1did you even read the story?
- seansshack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1nope? was an "in" joke, no references in the story bar the name(if I remember well enough)..
- Skinner72, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I agree also. Both those films are on my top ten list. A sequel or prequel could only server to diminish their greatness. If Tarantino is itching to work with these actors again, why not do something fresh? I'm sure it would be a success but don't defile greatness.
- so1omon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The specific plot ideas are new (the original plan was to do a prequel), but he's been talking about a Vega brothers movie since Pulp Fiction came out.
- mediaphile, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Are you serious? Are you serious.
Take a few screenwriting classes, then tell me Quentin Tarantino has weak dialog. Or you can just take my word for it: you're wrong. - sjgmoney, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I love both movies and never realized Madsen's and Travolta's characters were brothers. Am I the only stupid one? (ducks)
- hannahmar, on 06/11/2009, -0/+1Sweeeeet :D
Damn, I hate Travolta though. - clownbaby, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Nothing new about any of these details. Same ***** Madsen has been saying for a long time now except the part about their twin brothers. If this does happen, I don't see it happening for a LONG time. Tarantino's probably going to finish Inglorious Bastards before he works on Vega Brothers.. and he's not even done writing Inglorious Bastards. I think Vega bros is nothing but a pipe dream to be honest.
- junk, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I wouldn't mind seeing another film set in his "Vega Brothers" universe but I wouldn't hold my breath either.
- Tentei, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I have taken screenwriting thank you. And many of them consider his stuff a Joke.
- michaelbeckham, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2Let's hope it is better than "Be Cool", what a shocking sequel by the same people.
- jonesin, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2yes, he has. don't you remember that ***** vampire movie he made?
- DooDooFace, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Great site!
- thermus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Not sure why you're getting moded down, but I have to agree. Both of those movies are already classics. They demonstrate intense creativity and care. They were also made before everyone expected a blockbuster from QT, and for that, they retain the purity of his vision.
I hope to god he doesn't try to outdo himself and end up making a mess of it. -
Show 51 - 64 of 64 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is