What is Digg?108 Comments
- dcoolidge, on 10/10/2007, -1/+91DIE SCO DIE!!!!
- motang, on 10/10/2007, -0/+75They get what they deserve!
- thejuicer, on 10/10/2007, -5/+52calm down.
disco died a long time ago. - livevil, on 10/10/2007, -6/+50Ahahaahaah!!! Open Source bitches!!
- harvinator24, on 10/10/2007, -0/+28This is why your business plan shouldn't be, oh who are we going to sue today.
- Dumbledorito, on 10/10/2007, -1/+26Calm down, I'm sure this is all to do with the collapse of the mortgage sector. It says so right here on this memo from SCO's CEO himself, honest.
- hotdigg, on 10/10/2007, -0/+25SCO.... For The Loss!!!!!!! :D
- Microdot, on 10/10/2007, -1/+24i wish sco former employee's the best when hunting for a new job.
- gavincato, on 10/10/2007, -1/+23Suck that SCO, you greedy pricks.
Blatant money grab backfired. owned!!!!!! - prisoner24601, on 10/10/2007, -0/+22For great justice...
- corvairkid, on 10/10/2007, -0/+18If I was a SCO employee right now, I'd be loading up a U-Haul truck with anything of value in the office that isn't nailed down followed by stuff that's easily pried loose.
- sleepwalkers, on 10/10/2007, -2/+19Oh wow... That was terrible.
I'd laugh if I weren't too busy giving you the stink eye. - thejuicer, on 10/10/2007, -2/+16I'm thoroughly ashamed of myself.
- Garfunkel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+13hahah i hope they die a slow and painful death after what they have done.
***** you SCO. ***** you. - BrainInAJar, on 10/10/2007, -1/+14I'd love to pick up a single share of SCOX now that it's mostly worthless and get the paper cert to frame on my wall as a memento
- DNAspark99, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11woo... that only took, what, about 5-6 YEARS??? When did these whole SCO shenanigans start?
stockholders should have clued in a looooooooong time ago - Fordi, on 10/10/2007, -0/+11Ok, lemme just say a few things here:
First, you knew what he meant: as far as the 'net is concerned, FTW/FTL is just a nonsensical way of saying that X failed/succeeded, and that the speaker approves. It's slang. Get over it.
Second, your telling attempt at a pissing contest on the intarnets illustrates your own insecurities. I don't know if you're offended or just need to validate your own sexual experiences by decrying the possibility of others', but seriously, get over yourself.
Of course, there's also the rule that perfectly normal human + pseudonymity = complete *****. I'm sure that applies here.
In short, shut the ***** up, you useless trolling asshat. - CLShortFuse, on 10/10/2007, -3/+14Today's suggested stock to buy: NOVL
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NOVL - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+10SCO (or rather Caldera) sacked the majority of their productive staff (the geeks and plebs) a long long time ago.
Mainly to raise income for their new business model - profit by litigation.. Lawyers are expensive you know. - IEatHamburgers, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8From the guys who brought you Nortel Stock Wallpaper, it's SCO Budget Carpeting! Featuring 100% recyclable & worthless materials, SCO Budget Carpeting is the result of the brilliant combination of a shredder and a stockholder's dreams. Your family will love to walk on your floors after they discover how much money you saved on SCO Budget Carpeting!*
*Affection not guaranteed, particularly if family's feet are susceptible to papercuts - DontSayFanboy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Who in their right mind would have "most of there (sic) savings" in SCOX after all of this?
- NonSequituring, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7and that's a problem because? :P
- KidVicious, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7"Bart, it's not about money or stock, it's about how much copper wiring you can get out of the building with!"
- johnnybluejeans, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7You can't return a value when the method returns void. Maybe you should have tried compiling your joke to see that it was buggy.
- Akaji, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6It may be horrible, but it was still pretty brilliant...
- TheMachine1, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7This reminds me I need to buy some toilet paper(calling stock broker).
- venom8599, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6Carroarmatozero uses Pokemon battle joke
It has no effect... - Jugalator, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7There are two kinds of idiots involved here:
1. Those who believed SCO actually had a case here.
2. Those who still haven't sold their shares. (wtf?) - smellinator, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7you can buy it over their.
- sqrt7744, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7where?
- schestowitz, on 10/10/2007, -20/+26Guess who is next? http://schestowitz.com/Amusement/images/msft.png (GIMPed SCOX)
- Fordi, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6No. Just very German.
- Spr0k3t, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6It's only a matter of time before we take out the RIAA/MPAA...
- tritiumpie, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Go ahead, I'm sure you'll find at least one person willing to part with a share or two.
- psyjoniz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5********** SCO*****
those ***** asshats have been trying to squeeze money out of everything BUT actual work. good ***** riddance. - addakorn, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7Can not say you did not see that coming. Who in their right mind would have SCO stock? It only dropped 70%? This means at least one moron is buying it!
- jamiemcconnell, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Serves them right!
- GiggleStick, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Doesn't anyone remember Sideshow Bob?
- albinoMithos, on 10/10/2007, -4/+8Is it wrong that I read that as "THE SCO THE!!!!"?
- CarzorStelatis, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hahaha. As for the investors who lost money, serves them all right for investing in such a malicious company.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Any investor with money still in SCO is flat out negligent. SCO stock had little value before the case and just about everyone in the tech sector knew that SCO's position was vacuous and designed to artificially inflate the value of their stock
- xrenjrvt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3People who held this stock were speculating that there was a chance SCO would win, and the stock would go up. Anyone who thought this was a long term stock, should think twice before investing again.
- kazamx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3This is scary,
When Novell turns on Linux its going to cause big problems. They will turn at some point, either via a change in management or from being bought out. Then they can turn their guns on Linux, then our only hope is IBM and Google as the big guns to defend us. - Tobark, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Hahahah. SCO Recent headlines section stops in 2006. Wonder why . LOL
- Tobark, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3"Everytime I go to some trade show or exhibition, there's always the geeks with the "witty" IT t-shirt, "No I won't fix your computer" or such trying to be outrageous. I"
Ok , if you think that shirt is outrageous you need to get out more.
"I sometimes like to wear a SCO shirt just to piss those guys off"
So the people you were bashing , for whatever reason and I cant figure out what tshirt have to do with this, for wearing your so called outrageous tshirts are now joined by you, the guy who was complaining about it. Go figure.... - havesometea, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of cretins.
- gfair, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3This isn't all that surprising, or interesting.
However, what WOULD be news is: who shorted SCO stock and just made a 70% return in a few days? - burke, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3He's lying -- its over hear.
- bflfab, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3You'd be amazed how much most brokers will charge to get you the physical paper stock.
You can get the $0.5 share but add $50 for the fee - inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Novell could be evil and continue the case against IBM....I'm sure Microsoft would help finance that.
The Unix rights are like the ring in Lord of the Rings. People turn evil around it. -
Show 51 - 100 of 103 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 