10 Comments
- wheatley, on 02/18/2008, -1/+8Minor niggle, but why does the GNOME version have the Fedora logo while this version has the generic logo instead? Were the developers simply focusing on more important features before looking at polish?
- inactive, on 02/18/2008, -2/+7Same as in Ubuntu. the KDE distro have to play second fiddle and can't find a artwarok team to really customise the Distro look for KDE.
- RobotBuddha, on 02/18/2008, -1/+5I like that they're starting to back KDE a bit more. But it takes rewriting pretty much every distro specific feature with a KDE GUI to really be considered a first class citizen in that world.
- thinman1189, on 02/18/2008, -1/+5Having seen KDE 4 I would really love a distro to use it to its full potential.
- rahulsundaram, on 02/18/2008, -1/+5Pretty much. There is a lot of integration work that needs to be done before covering branding.
- darkchild, on 02/18/2008, -0/+4How about openSUSE? They seem to treat KDE and GNOME more or less on par (although many were upset when GNOME was made the default in some NOVELL products).
- Waterrat, on 02/18/2008, -0/+1 Having used Gnome and KDE,I like KDE more..Your mileage may vairy.
- Chilian, on 02/18/2008, -0/+1Score one for KDE, and me.
- kolakutusu, on 07/14/2008, -0/+0fedora is a kde disto isn't reaaly usefull
http://www.onlineflashgames.org
http://www.bid-directory.net - fengshaun, on 02/18/2008, -0/+0that's what I'm talking about ;)


What is Digg?