14 Comments
- johnstar, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1pick a ***** standard so I can upgrade my router already!
- nsummy, on 10/12/2007, -5/+5I like how every comment on this article right now has negatives diggs!
- dw2005, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2"The publication of the final 802.11n spec is now expected in April 2009"
That's ridiculous! - this really need to be 'fast tracked' - LTrain, on 10/12/2007, -5/+4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11m
Not being Retarded: 1
Blakechi: 0 - rlombardo, on 11/05/2008, -5/+4It's about time.
Does Draft 2.0 mean that the router will automatically force your computer to render every web site with bright colors, slick gradients and shiny reflections? - meshman, on 10/12/2007, -8/+7Wow, it's refreshing to see something with 2.0 on it that isn't completely inaccurate.
- Scrappy1850, on 10/12/2007, -6/+4802.11n Draft 2.0 'The Draftening'
- mojoel, on 10/12/2007, -8/+6802.11n Draft 2.0 'The Revenge'
- spamzor, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2lol this draft sounds like one of my teams UNI assignments argh
- archlich, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2Who is the Working Group, and why does their opinion matter to the IEEE? I wish the article would mention that they're directly involved.
- Scrappy1850, on 10/12/2007, -7/+3cool! i hope so
- humperdeath, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1wait for 802.11n on Rails
- Qoiu, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1sounds good hope, it works out
- Blakechi, on 10/12/2007, -9/+2About the time they reach the "final form", the 802.11M spec will probably be created.


What is Digg?