Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
47 Comments
- Niubai, on 12/10/2007, -7/+43Take that, Jesus !!!!
- LeeSoong, on 12/10/2007, -2/+24First Application: The Self Cleaning Toilet Bowl.
(Do Not Flush while miniBots are cleaning . . .) - inactive, on 12/10/2007, -0/+17that's brilliant. You should be a toilet scientist.
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -1/+13that could not lead to anything good. Just imagine sitting down while they were cleaning. tiny robots attacking sensitive areas is not what I want scientists to devleop.
- LeeSoong, on 12/10/2007, -1/+12Well, they would be on a timer - like the robotic vacuum cleaners.
They only come out at night when you are sleeping to clean the commode,
and a little red light would tell you not to sit down, even a locking lid would be useful.
An override button would send them scurrying back into their storage slots,
so you could use the toilet on-demand within 8 seconds. - NessTheHero, on 12/10/2007, -0/+10Personally, I think just the depiction of surface tension in that picture is amazing. The water looks like plastic!
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -3/+12or even develop
- RonBurgundy76, on 12/10/2007, -0/+8You forgot 'tiny'.
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -3/+11Why do I see this type of thing leading us to a StarCraft-like future?
- Sporky023, on 12/10/2007, -0/+7Arggh!!! For the gazillion-and-oneth time people. People who make new technology are engineers, not scientists. I get offended about this and I speak for every other engineer on the entire planet. It's like asking someone in the Marines when they "joined the army". Except people in the Marines and the Army do the exact same thing. Scientists determine what's what. Engineers use that to make what's new.
Sheesh - sholt, on 12/10/2007, -1/+8I'm actually starting to like that song
- pkonink, on 12/10/2007, -0/+7Dugg for "Scientists hope to adapt this technology to the obvious sector; creepy sounding robots."
- hadak, on 12/10/2007, -1/+8What if you don't have 8 seconds?
- gregdigg, on 12/10/2007, -0/+6Another story about robots with no video. Should be a law.
- liquidjamm, on 12/10/2007, -0/+6Someone got a big one on their shoulder. Do you have nightmares about scientists?
- maxyRO, on 12/10/2007, -3/+9awesome, just like the water spiders
- A11YND, on 12/10/2007, -0/+6Does this mean Jesus was a robot?
- yohan, on 12/10/2007, -2/+6Does it remind anyone else of those spider-like things from Super Mario 64 that glided on the water?
- JKVM, on 12/10/2007, -0/+4You use the sink or the bathtub. Sometimes innovation requires innovation.
- phaseblue, on 12/10/2007, -1/+4I think the other robots just found their savior
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -0/+3Sounds like a lot of money for toilet robots to clean ***** particles. Maybe you should patent it, and replace all those stupid toilet brushes.
- Lord_Soth, on 12/10/2007, -10/+12In Soviet Russia water bounce on robots!!!
- sjbdallas, on 12/10/2007, -0/+2Well, scientists in the past few months have created robot cockroaches and robot snakes. Now that they have the waterways covered with the water bouncing robots, there's really no place for us to hide.
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -1/+3nice
- hablabla, on 12/10/2007, -1/+3It's easy to bounce a robot across water. Just break it into tiny peices, and hammer them flat. With the proper wrist action...
- sjbdallas, on 12/10/2007, -0/+2So a cure for cancer made with nanobots is done by which? Scientists or Engineers?
- pkonink, on 12/11/2007, -0/+2Scientologists?
- Vorin, on 12/10/2007, -1/+2yes, i, too, know how to spell two.
i just woke up ok?
cut me some slack. - sjbdallas, on 12/10/2007, -0/+1You might be on to something. I was trying to remember any water scenes in the 3 terminator movies and I can't seem to think of any.
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -1/+2too bad you can't build boats in SC
switching from Command and Conquer to SC was the most confusing thing ever!
building units actually makes sense now. - Devan612, on 12/10/2007, -1/+2Video, or it didn't happen.
- manikfox, on 12/10/2007, -1/+2http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1137 ...
Direct link to video. - hfactor, on 12/11/2007, -0/+1Most of them already can't.
- TheSageBush, on 12/10/2007, -0/+1they should model robots after spiders. rule # 1, they can't jump on water!!
- monkeyboy7706, on 12/11/2007, -0/+1Most but not all of them? Where can I get this Necromancer Bot.
- Niels, on 12/10/2007, -0/+1They didn't discover it.... just copy it from nature
- lolo2007, on 01/27/2008, -0/+0Arggh!!! For the gazillion-and-oneth time people. People who make new technology are engineers, not scientists. I get offended about this and I speak for every other engineer on the entire planet. It's like asking someone in the Marines when they "joined the army". Except people in the Marines and the Army do the exact same thing. Scientists determine what's what. Engineers use that to make what's new. http://game.paramegsoft.com/
http://download.paramegsoft.com/
http://www.paramegsoft.com - crossers, on 07/19/2008, -0/+0oh it's awesome, it looks like spider sorry water-spider!
http://www.shpe-sac.org
http://www.ocflex.com/
http://www.trgovinca.org
http://www.chasr.org/ - funkytaco, on 12/10/2007, -2/+1This has been covered on Digg several times already dot dot dot
- john570, on 12/10/2007, -3/+2Dave...
- inactive, on 12/10/2007, -5/+2jesus don't have ridiculously long legs that moves at 400 mph.
- Niubai, on 12/10/2007, -7/+4Here you go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU - Vorin, on 12/10/2007, -9/+4maybe a bit to far, but dugg for absurdity.
- farmerjim, on 12/10/2007, -7/+1Because your a nerd?
- hadak, on 12/10/2007, -9/+2People seldom mix “two” up with the other two; it obviously belongs with words that also begin with TW, like “twice” and “twenty” that involve the number 2. But the other two are confused all the time. Just remember that the only meanings of “too” are “also” (“I want some ice cream too.”) and “in excess” (“Your walkman is playing too loudly.”). Note that extra O. It should remind you that this word has to do with adding more on to something. “To” is the proper spelling for all the other uses.
- Biojoe, on 12/10/2007, -8/+0Whats Next? A Robot that cant raise people from the dead?
- TheCosmicFool, on 12/10/2007, -15/+3I for one welcome our new water walking robot overlords



What is Digg?