What is Digg?29 Comments
- mightymouse, on 05/05/2008, -1/+19Oh why do you tease us with such desktop worthy images without desktop sized images?
- estate, on 05/05/2008, -1/+6To get higher res versions:
Right click - View image.
Check out the URL, play with it and you'll find the source files.
Here're a few:
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/uploads/081-a ...
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/uploads/064-a ...
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/uploads/007-a ...
Sadly not much bigger but it's something. - Surferess, on 05/05/2008, -0/+3I usually write to the webmaster and give them a heads up, but there isn't a contact address.
The thumbnails are 100K each! - jer21, on 05/05/2008, -1/+4Awesome...just wish they were a higher resolution.
- angilinmago, on 05/05/2008, -1/+3dude, this is not funny anymore
- dever, on 05/05/2008, -1/+3Bummer that its down already, some great photos to be seen. Worth the wait, try it later folks.
- whatwhatwhoa, on 05/05/2008, -0/+2should've linked to the nude section instead.
- lukeslytalker, on 05/05/2008, -0/+2great collection
- diceau, on 05/05/2008, -0/+2I want some of those as wallpapers ... any ideas how to get them? 1680x1050 ftw.
- ALyken, on 05/05/2008, -1/+3Utterly impressive
- Lubinski, on 05/12/2008, -0/+1OH yes it is.... learn to drink the kool-aide fool.
- Kevunism, on 05/05/2008, -1/+2Digg effect already?? NOOOOO!
The internet killed nature again - Lubinski, on 05/05/2008, -1/+2Buried for lack of 1680x1050 or greater
- Emmo213, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1Wait, this is even better.
Do the right click to view the URL. At the end is a size parameter. Just change that size and there ya go.
(I bumped this one to 1280. Just type in what you need by replacing the 1280)
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/utilities/mag ... - Nickbc87, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1The 8th picture looks like Death Mountain from OoT.
- novenator, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1hehe. small but decent nude photo section. nothing like met-art but still nice
- Emmo213, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1Bah, the editing on Digg still sucks. My first post disappeared when I edited it so I posted again, then the first post it back but the links are messed up. **sigh**
- novenator, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1stunning photos! the last one is of a drainage pattern in the sand caused during a falling tide. I took some photos of that same effect in LA a few years ago.
- kickyourbrain, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1...This site best viewed in 640x480 resolution
- Emmo213, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1Once you go to View Image you can change the size in the URL.
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/utilities/mag ...
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/utilities/mag ...
Just replace the 1280 with whatever you need. Some scale poorly though. - novenator, on 05/05/2008, -0/+1thanks, those are nice photos, so anything bigger is better
- RunawayHusband, on 05/06/2008, -0/+0I tried without success,can you please do it for this image ,http://www.worldphotographicarts.com/gallery/color ...
thnxs man!
Pat - Coffeedemon, on 05/05/2008, -1/+2No its not. Grow up.
- xwfilm, on 05/05/2008, -1/+1A lot of these look like HDRs. When did that become kosher for nature photography? Ansel Adams would be disappointed.
- Lubinski, on 05/05/2008, -1/+1OH its hilarious still..
- stolenisotope1, on 05/05/2008, -1/+1BUT IT IS IN REVERSE!
- je12u, on 05/05/2008, -0/+0Sorry to comment jack
Mirror:
http://www.worldphotographicarts.com.nyud.net:8090 ... - stolenisotope1, on 05/05/2008, -8/+1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aD4bn5pp32w
Dude, this is 100 times more beautiful!
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
