Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular
'CO2 scrubber’ could help slow global warming
telegraph.co.uk — The prototype will cost about £100,000 and take about two years to construct at a laboratory in Tucson, Arizona. Environmentalists may warn that so-called technological solutions to global warming undermine attempts to promote greener lifestyles and industries.
norman619- 8 diggs
- digg it
- norman619, on 07/26/2008, -1/+1This is classic. We finally have technology which can help remove the dreaded CO2 from the air and the environmentalists don't celebrate. they would much rather we forsake fossil fuels and live the life of the Amish.
- greenfyre, on 07/26/2008, -0/+1Or it could be the fact that this is as yet a very uncertain and only partial solution, but you can bet everyone is going to 'celebrate' on the assumption of "Mission Accomplished" ... sort of like you are doing.
- norman619, on 07/26/2008, -1/+2You are obviously of the opinion that CO2 drives global temperature changes when it's a long established fact that changes in CO2 levels follow changes in temps not precede them. This technology does exactly what environmentalists want yet they aren't praising it. And please keep your political BS (Mission Accomplished) references out of what should be a scientific debate not a political one.
- greenfyre, on 07/26/2008, -1/+1No, I am obviously someone who has looked at the science
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007 ...
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/22/231145 ...
Where is the science in your post? Looks like nothing except political BS. Here, this is what science looks like
"How we know we're not wrong about climate change" http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/Presentations/O ...
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/evidence/
http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1278
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007 ...
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm
http://www.ghgonline.org/pubarchive.htm
- greenfyre, on 07/26/2008, -0/+1Or it could be the fact that this is as yet a very uncertain and only partial solution, but you can bet everyone is going to 'celebrate' on the assumption of "Mission Accomplished" ... sort of like you are doing.
- brad3378, on 07/26/2008, -0/+1I can see this technology being used to literally feed algae oil bioreactors.
I wonder how much energy is requires to extract a ton of C02?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by