digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Web2.0 - Extended Mindcloudmap [Awesome]

flickr.com — A very interesting web2.0 map!

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • saikhan, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8Digg is at the center of my web2.0 mind(cloud).
    • DeathBorn, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6What's the scanner say about his buzzword level?

      It's over NINE THOUSAAAAND! Run for your lives!

    • RamanujanRedux, on 10/12/2007, -2/+5Thanks Vegeta.
    • AcidPhysx, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2At the center I see a bunch of CEO's asking why their web site isn't Web 2.0. I then see a bunch of back-end programmers and markup guys asking the photoshop guys to make some extremely flashy and bandwidth consuming graphics to upload to the web server. The programmers then go back to evolving the site as they always have been, disregarding the Web 2.0 buzz word as a pile of steaming dog *****. Web 2.0 does not exist. Its that simple. There is no real outline, no RFC, no standard. God love the person who coined that terrible ***** paradigm.
    • seventoes, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1DeathBorn, this isnt 4chan. gtfo.
  • jakebarnes, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9Just OK.
  • jmontez, on 12/10/2007, -8/+1Pretty cool image. Hope this sticks around for a little while longer on teh internets. Web 2.0 is a pretty cool turnaround from crappy html programmers back in the day =p.
    • PretLetters, on 10/12/2007, -7/+2Erm, you do not program with markup languages. Not then, not now.
    • jhaven, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10@montez:

      You do realize that, "Web 2.0" or not, the majority of sites are still (X)HTML, right?

      Just because it says "php" at the end of the URL doesn't mean the page isn't marked up in (X)HTML...
  • 4Prophecy, on 10/12/2007, -1/+14I prefer this one; it's more honest. http://topatoco.com/web20.html
  • kbarrett, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5I thought this was going to be some kind of cool flash app. Instead it's just a picture on Flickr with some notes.

    Marked as lame.
  • huggiesmiff, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3this is old. wheres the web 3.0 cloud?
  • sidp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2If it really is as awesome as the title suggests, I just gotta digg it. Unfortunately, it's not.
  • PunkHop, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Way too small, hard to read, static.

    Lame. Buried.
  • stelt, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2I've seen similar things but then cool: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG); selectable text, zoomable without loss of quality, interactive
  • snowboarder04, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2This has been on the web 2.0 wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2 for a ridiculously long time already. buried.
  • Jarasmen, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Somebody propably put some work to create that thing... however, that's one of the most useless things I've seen in a while. I just can't see ***** on that image and I'd propably google 10 good sites faster than find one on there.
  • kaektech, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0That's so meta.
  • phlogiston99, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1[Awesome] in the headline made me click on it! [Awesome] !!!
  • dylanrush, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1OK, this is lame.
  • fintheman, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Dugg down for web 2.0 usage in title.
  • smotiska, on 01/13/2008, -0/+1Dammit, I can't see it. It says it's a private Fickr page. I want to see it too. BTW Fintheman, what's wrong with web 2.0?

    Sheree
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.