What is Digg?162 Comments
- doddilus, on 10/12/2007, -8/+292not a single boobie... i call bs
- brocklese, on 10/12/2007, -18/+220and no gotse? :(
- AntBing, on 10/12/2007, -7/+96Who picked this *****? There are some really good ones, but top 500...never.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -7/+85C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER
- dpk87, on 10/12/2007, -7/+65O RLY?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -14/+65mmm.... tubgirl
- illahtech, on 10/12/2007, -1/+42I was thinking the same thing - if you got the top 500 on the internet, at least 100 should be witty forum photochops aimed at noobs.
- danakin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+37These are amazing images, but how exactly are they the top 500?
- moft, on 10/12/2007, -1/+37should read:
"500 images of various quality - your favourites are not here :(" - PATSCRU, on 10/12/2007, -3/+34i kno...goatse is like #***** with a bullet....These look like a bunch of Vista screensavers....boring, safe, and dull....i'll upgrade to vista when they have a goatse screen saver doing a ken burns fade into tubgirl and then a slow ken burns pan down longcat's sexy sexy body
p.s...@kcpwnsgmanl, you're in for a world of pain - marsbar, on 10/12/2007, -3/+34As someone who has finished the Internet, I speak with authority and I say those are only 493 of the top images on the Interweb.
- BugMeNot2, on 10/12/2007, -7/+36YA RLY!
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -11/+39yeah. It's not a top 500 without goatse, lemonparty, harlequin fetus, tub girl, and pain series.
- kcpwnsgman, on 10/12/2007, -5/+33@harbl
I have no idea what you are talking about, now I need to go to google and see what these top images are... - Vision2098, on 10/12/2007, -2/+291 - Cut a hole in a box.
- scot184, on 10/12/2007, -1/+26This is like a cheesy gallery of free images you get for your website in 9th grade computer class.
Seriously. A tomato bathing in ice water? Not once, but twice.
Who the *$#@ declared this the top 500 of anything? - Traedortious, on 10/12/2007, -0/+20Digg is going to destroy this website
- Azap, on 10/12/2007, -3/+23Thats not a hair question
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+24How about a nice warm cup of STFU?
- crossmr, on 10/12/2007, -3/+21Good question. All very interesting and nice, but I don't see a single piece of porn so I know its bogus.
- mmrz, on 10/12/2007, -8/+26NO WAI!
- PATSCRU, on 10/12/2007, -9/+25p.s. don't kill me, sorry for posting twice, but i found a real internet top 20
http://badgas.co.uk/griffnut/
not perfect, but it's a start...... - ansonparker, on 10/12/2007, -0/+16What a bunch of oversaturated, contrast-cranked cliches.
- Jagdelysian, on 10/12/2007, -8/+23Well at least some of us were on the same wavelength. These images are great and all but why are they the top 500?
- jimsf, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12Considering you lifted the images with out giving credit to the photographers (a form of copyright infringement) the least you could have done was provided links to their web site.
- sarahpalmer, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12so.. basically about 490 sunset pictures, and a couple of lame macros. Great variety.. real original photographs.
- boojitsu, on 10/12/2007, -4/+14pretty much yeah.... no nudity.... no violence..... not stupidity.... hardly the top 500 of the internet
maybe the top 500 of the site's 502 available images it has.
-Boojitsu21 - Agret, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10where's the porn?
- cuoops, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9The top 500 that you haven't downloaded from newsgroups a hundred times...or more.
- gmprunner, on 10/12/2007, -1/+10Someone went through every image on the internet and narrowed it down to the top 500? Now THAT'S dedication.
- bbeahm, on 10/12/2007, -0/+8Lets put a page with at least 500 images to load on the front page of digg. That server will be toast.
- mikal, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9Wow, that was lame. Here, let me start a list:
http://www.argaste.com/img/arguing_on_the_internet.jpg
http://www.ntskeptics.org/2002/2002september/tourist.jpg
http://www.darkeye.net/~fredrik/fun/more/hk40k.jpg
http://images.tabulas.com/11181/m/domokun-gokillskittens.jpg - Proggie, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7No attribution???
- robogobo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Top 500 gay inspirational poster images. Each one could hang in the managers office and say TEAMWORK or DEDICATION. There's nothing special about these other than cranking the saturation all the way up, tinting the hue violet and contrast contrast contrast. gross.
- EBFoxbat, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Props to alex860. I for one would never have the balls to post anything pertaining to 500 pictures to digg. I could never be so cruel to unsuspecting server(s)
- elupus, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7It's actually only 401 images. How rude!
- cyberpope, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7500 images? All I'm getting is a 500 error. [ would have been such a witty comment at the top :( ]
- mathew_bug, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5More important than everything else: where are the CREDITS?
- Avisto, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Images do not get coralised!
There is no point linking to the coral cache when the page is full of images. - Vectorman2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5this would be a better reason for a pics topic, if all of them were actually photos and not renders from Maya or Lightwave and such.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5I really hate when people take it upon themselves to label ***** like "Top x images of the internet!"
Most of the times they fail, just like this article. I've never once seen any of those images, and as mentioned above, Goatse or Tubgirl will definitely be in the Top 10.
What's even more hilarious is how everyone dugg this, as if they've seen the images before. Hint: you haven't, so stop digging it. It doesn't matter if the images look nice, they aren't the "Top 500 images" as falsely stated in the title. - flamingmb, on 10/12/2007, -2/+7because the guy who's website is getting all the hits says so!
- geminus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5I call ***** flag! Not a single picture from digitalblasphemy... who the hell is running Digg lately anyways? I thought this website was supposed to be community driven! Nope, it's been taken over by a band of narrow scoped gypsies. I'm going back to slashdot.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6well, i didn't vote for them.
- ICSU, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Just go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_pictures
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Digg Censorship?
Why isn't this story in the top listing? 1,300 Diggs
http://digg.com/politics/BBC_Reported_Building_7_Had_Collapsed_20_Minutes_Before_It_Fell - Jenga, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I was going to say...
I'm against restrictions of content distribution in the form of DRM and such, but this website has just shamelessly taken 500 images and shown them without attribution. Photographers are not wealthy people, and it pains me to see them getting screwed over by illegal redistribution like this.
Also, some of the photos are nice, but very few (if any) should be in a top 500 list of any kind. Unless its a "top 500 stock photos" list. - Zomar, on 10/12/2007, -5/+9I disagree.
- drsnooks, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Fark pictures??? Surely you mean http://b3ta.com
-
Show 51 - 100 of 160 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
