What is Digg?287 Comments
- ChromaVita, on 02/12/2008, -6/+541Some of these are really lame. The simpsons picture seemed out of place.
- Tony611, on 02/12/2008, -2/+398number 15 (giant woman lying down in minature village) isn't photoshop. there was a thing on digg a while ago about that photographer. He just makes tiny sets and had models come in.
- mariot75, on 02/12/2008, -14/+148some are cool, some a bit obvious, but mostly all very creative - dugg
- bxblox, on 02/12/2008, -0/+130Top 40 is a great exaggeration.
- Ogedei, on 02/12/2008, -3/+104Dude, I could draw a stick figure and you'd want to hit it.
- arcooke, on 02/12/2008, -5/+91Here's another good shot of that 3D girl. The artist does amazing work...
http://kjun.org/homepag/image/shaiya_light-bf.jpg
I'd hit it if she was real. Now that's a sign of talent. :P - piesforyou, on 02/12/2008, -5/+79I don't know - some arn't even photoshopped at all.
- curme, on 02/12/2008, -0/+70Wouldn't it just be easier to post a link to worth100.com?
- Flamekebab, on 02/12/2008, -0/+61That Simpsons one was utter wank.
- damawa42, on 02/12/2008, -0/+58I don't get why some of them are necessarily shopped.
E.g. #4 could really be a moron sticking his head under an xray machine,
and #15 is clearly a woman lying in a miniature village complete with bonsai trees in the foreground and OH WAIT life-size bushes in the background.
And wtf is with the man and woman spooning? What's that image getting at? - GhostSniper, on 02/12/2008, -4/+56Some of these aren't even manipulated.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2175/2248788786_dcc ... for example... - Sophistifunk, on 02/12/2008, -0/+49At least 3 Of those images aren't photoshopped. 1's simply tricky photography, and 2 are CG.
- frazw, on 02/12/2008, -0/+42There are a few which aren't photoshopped, or at least only a little bit of lighting adjustment
- LocDawg, on 02/12/2008, -7/+47◑ ◔
╔═╗
║▓▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
╚═╝ - wattznext, on 02/12/2008, -0/+33I love how normally diggers are cyring "That's shopped! I know cause I've seen a millions 'shops in my day."
Now everyone is saying "These aren't even shopped!" Fan-*****-tastic - inactive, on 02/12/2008, -0/+33I vote the apple one as the creepiest
- CharlesMay, on 02/12/2008, -1/+34Yea, definitely not worth being on a "Top" list.
- pyrodude, on 02/12/2008, -0/+32because it is not a photo but completly made from scratch in PS
- juliustan, on 02/12/2008, -0/+30A lot of these aren't even photoshopped.
- Spuy767, on 02/12/2008, -3/+33What is with number 7, it looks like Lindsey Lohan ***** some random guy. . . How is that photoshop worthy?
- blahtastic, on 02/12/2008, -0/+30Digg, where real pictures are called photoshops and photoshops are called real.
- darkfate, on 02/12/2008, -2/+31The first one looks like hypnotoad. ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
- Kerrigore, on 02/12/2008, -1/+27Was it even photoshopped? How is it different than if someone just drew it?
- mjfitzge, on 02/12/2008, -4/+28is it weird that i would have found her more attractive if she had pointy ears?
- NinjaJoey, on 02/12/2008, -0/+22The one with the woman laying in the town isn't modified. It's just a woman laying in a model town; I saw it on the artist's website.
- inactive, on 02/12/2008, -2/+24who's the blonde getting ***** from behind?
- chilipeppers4u, on 02/12/2008, -1/+22Some of these are stunningly beautiful, but somehow I can only really remember the apple with that scary ass mouth. What a great nightmare inducing image to have stuck in my head just before going to sleep...
- heatman, on 02/12/2008, -1/+18Depends, did you roll for initiative?
- hsanchezp, on 02/12/2008, -0/+17I liked most of them with the exception of the Simpsons picture
- kleverness, on 02/12/2008, -0/+16Here you will find your answer: http://www.wade.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/tutorial1.htm ;)
- zackkitzmiller, on 02/12/2008, -0/+16I can't wait for digg to add a "Reply" button, then you won't have to do that...
- Slade605, on 02/12/2008, -0/+16I agree, I believe the title "40 Photoshopped Images" would have been just fine.
- TonyTheTerrible, on 02/12/2008, -4/+19the majority are pretty bad. a collection of uninspired photo's i've personally seen several times each. meh, i expected as much with such a digg title.
- inactive, on 02/12/2008, -0/+12Digg needs a Crap section.
- CharlesMay, on 02/12/2008, -2/+14It was, right at the last minute her hand slipped off the edge of the bed and she accidentally swallowed it. It's OK though, she gave birth 30 minutes later.
- RunnyBabbit, on 02/12/2008, -0/+12That was hand-drawn. It came with a complete tutorial, it was here on Digg awhile back.
- BuyCheapCialis, on 02/12/2008, -0/+11Why it's calling "Top 40" ? Who is the judge?
- flashback99, on 02/12/2008, -0/+11LSD + Computer Skills = Talent
- sirber, on 02/12/2008, -0/+10stolen images. One of them (the girl with green eyes) is a photo from one of my contact on flickr, and the title is (translated from french) "When we are that nice we don't need photoshop".
http://www.flickr.com/photos/benoitpaille/21483977 ... - garfonzo, on 02/12/2008, -0/+10oh man, sorry to Tony611 above - I'm repeating what you said in your post and I can't delete mine. Sorry.
- trg100, on 02/12/2008, -2/+12"are", pedant
- Rheic, on 02/12/2008, -1/+11no wai?
- iticu, on 02/12/2008, -1/+11It wasn't actually smart, and then you accused Zack of digging you down, which implied you were whining over 1 digg down, and then you insulted all digg users by calling us "idiots", and then you reply to yourself AGAIN..
God, what did you think was gunna happen?
In contrast., I actually know i'm gunna get dugg down for this. =) - thewhits, on 02/12/2008, -3/+12above average collection
- CharlesMay, on 02/12/2008, -0/+9We did, just didn't fell like turning every last thing on digg into a political debate.
- jggr, on 02/12/2008, -4/+13And I totally wasn't expecting a snarky/elitist comment on the internet.
Sense of humour. Get one.
/It was a pretty lame joke though. ;) - wcarolyn, on 02/12/2008, -0/+9I felt like they didn't do enough research selecting the pictures. It seems like they just created this post to get traffic and promote the software they sell. Also, I doubt they actually have permission to use it. It says strictly in the Worth1000 FAQ that the images may not be published without permission and I doubt they got any. I play on worth1000 and one of my image was published on a few websites along time ago. I don't mind if they're doing it to promote me, as an artist, but when they don't give proper credits to the artist, it seems like they're just doing it to freeload content for their website. I'm sure other artists would feel the same.
- nepawoods, on 02/12/2008, -0/+8"I got dugg down for saying something smart?"
Well, let's do an experiment. Say something smart again, and let's see what happens. - inactive, on 02/12/2008, -7/+15i don't get it
-
Show 51 - 100 of 282 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
