What is Digg?17 Comments
- Coffeedemon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+12Most here are 'pro' photographers?
Many of these effects might be tacky but whats the harm in throwing a bone to the unwashed once in a while - maybe they can aspire to the heights that your photos occupy. - artman, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8I've always used Hue & Saturation for teeth and eyes. Same method of selection though.
/most teeth are yellow
//bookmarked this page too - mzkw, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials.html
There are a lot more. Some of those are videos. - el_jefe, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Digital cameras have made everyone a photographer, but I am willing to bet most that visit this site are not "pros".
- igraham09, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3you can also get a crap-load of tutorials at www.tutorialized.com
they're grouped by category and by program - Machine, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2It's easy when the subject already kind of looks like an alien... ^-^
- mark1372, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Part of the reason why teeth look particularly yellow with flash photography is the colour temperature of the flash, which is on the blue side of the spectrum. People who are wearing a white shirt or are near a large white area will also get yellower-looking teeth when having their picture taken with the "automatic" setting on the camera since it will often white-balance on the largest area.
Aside from that, teeth aren't actually white, as mentioned. Unless you've got those hideous, enormous fake choppers like Hilary Duff. - Distroia, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2http://www.tutorialjunkies.com/alien/
Best tutorial ever! - csprech, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1those are some pretty weak tutorials. when will someone submit some for the more advanced shoppers?
- ana10g, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Digital cameras have made everyone a photographer - and understandably those who really know the traditional process should be a little frusterated. It isn't so much fun to see the art of darkroom printing so swiftly replaced with the click of a mouse. I can sympathize with those who like the convenience, but to a lot of professionals and fine art photographers photoshop is really sickening.
But then anyone can go out and buy cheap watercolor paint and go at it - the real artist is one who knows all of the old ways of painting and the history behind their art. It seems that too many of the kids buying digital SLR's today do not know anything of how the camera actually works - it does too much for them. I think that the real artist knows what he is doing from using the traditional process, from knowing how light and film and paper work together to make images - and then applies that knowledge to digital tools. - MrKas, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3There's some great stuff in these tutorials... it's a pity they're laid out in a flat list and not grouped into categories
- BernardBlack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0http://www.good-tutorials.com/ is really good too just photoshop tutorials (entire section of photography tutorials indexed), and there is http://www.pixel2life.com/ which has photoshop tutorials and many more programs.
BernardBlack
http://elitegfx.com/ - meshgiath, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Someone makes this post on Digg about every 2-3 months. Usually the same old tricks plus 1 or 2. Odd...
- iEclipse, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2I love photography check my flickr.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/-tatum-/ - EmmSee, on 10/12/2007, -6/+0Cool - nice resource.
- paulchu, on 10/12/2007, -18/+1why do these sites always get dugg? they're relatively simple tricks that most pro photographers already know. And yes, they're "tricks," as they really involve no skill.
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is